H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Petra Martic vs Rebecca Marino H2H: 1-0

Petra Martic holds a 1–0 lead over Rebecca Marino in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Petra Martic leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Petra Martic won the 2021 Phillip Island Trophy second round 6-2 5-7 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Petra Martic
Croatia Age 35 Right-Handed 181 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Rebecca Marino
Canada Age 35 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Petra Martic #19 6-2 5-7 6-4 Rebecca Marino #317 Match data Feb 16, 2021* R32 Phillip Island Trophy WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Petra Martic #349 #14 2,850 1,938 212 215 49.6% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Rebecca Marino #422 #38 1,322 1,726 48 78 38.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Petra Martic Rebecca Marino
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2007 0–1 0.0% #330 1,480 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2008 2–1 66.7% #215 1,505 0 0 2008 1–1 50.0% #356 1,501 0 0
18 2009 6–7 46.2% #82 1,538 0 0 2009 1–1 50.0% #178 1,502 0 0
19 2010 5–14 26.3% #142 1,516 0 0 2010 3–2 60.0% #104 1,550 0 0
20 2011 16–14 53.3% #50 1,621 0 0 2011 14–19 42.4% #64 1,561 0 0
21 2012 18–18 50.0% #59 1,691 0 0 2012 0–3 0.0% #420 1,530 0 0
22 2013 7–12 36.8% #107 1,607 0 0 2013 0–1 0.0% #418 1,522 0 0
23 2014 1–8 11.1% #186 1,515 0 0 — — — — — — —
24 2015 0–8 0.0% #148 1,435 0 0 — — — — — — —
25 2016 3–3 50.0% #262 1,525 0 0 — — — — — — —
26 2017 6–4 60.0% #89 1,613 0 0 — — — — — — —
27 2018 26–17 60.5% #32 1,798 0 0 2018 2–1 66.7% #215 1,547 0 0
28 2019 36–17 67.9% #15 1,901 0 1 — — — — — — —
29 2020 14–11 56.0% #18 1,804 0 1 — — — — — — —
30 2021 15–21 41.7% #54 1,656 0 1 2021 4–5 44.4% #145 1,561 0 0
31 2022 25–17 59.5% #38 1,796 0 2 2022 12–14 46.2% #63 1,688 0 0
32 2023 20–19 51.3% #40 1,806 0 2 2023 7–18 28.0% #176 1,586 0 0
33 2024 9–19 32.1% #122 1,635 0 2 2024 1–6 14.3% #102 1,677 0 0
34 2025 3–4 42.9% #209 1,606 0 2 2025 3–6 33.3% #178 1,619 0 0
35 — — — — — — — 2026 0–1 0.0% #422 1,603 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Petra Martic Rebecca Marino
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 2007 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2008 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2009 3 4 7 42.9% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2009 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2010 3 7 10 30.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2010 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2011 11 9 20 55.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2011 9 13 22 40.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
21 2012 12 12 24 50.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2012 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2013 1 6 7 14.3% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2013 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2014 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2015 0 4 4 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2016 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2017 0 2 2 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2018 18 10 28 64.3% 7 5 12 58.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2018 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2019 14 12 26 53.8% 16 3 19 84.2% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2020 8 7 15 53.3% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2021 7 13 20 35.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2021 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2022 11 9 20 55.0% 11 5 16 68.8% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2022 10 9 19 52.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — —
32 2023 12 13 25 48.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2023 4 12 16 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — —
33 2024 5 11 16 31.3% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2024 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
34 2025 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2025 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2026 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 109 129 238 45.8% 77 63 140 55.0% 24 21 45 53.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — 37 59 96 38.5% 3 7 10 30.0% 8 12 20 40.0% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 406/427 of Petra Martic's and 117/124 of Rebecca Marino's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Petra Martic Rebecca Marino
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 2007 1/1 4.0 3.0 51.0% 75.5% 55.3% 50.0% 33.3% 65.6% 38.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
17 2008 2/3 3.0 5.5 66.8% 69.2% 33.8% 56.3% 66.7% 57.6% 48.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2009 12/13 2.0 3.0 60.5% 63.9% 45.2% 60.5% 50.2% 57.0% 40.2% 2009 2/2 8.5 0.5 62.3% 63.7% 49.0% 63.9% 66.7% 58.1% 29.9%
19 2010 18/19 2.4 4.3 62.9% 60.8% 45.8% 55.5% 38.6% 55.0% 37.5% 2010 5/5 9.2 2.4 57.1% 77.2% 48.4% 78.1% 26.7% 64.7% 38.2%
20 2011 27/30 3.8 5.3 56.2% 64.5% 47.1% 50.8% 38.7% 56.7% 41.6% 2011 30/33 6.5 3.6 55.9% 67.5% 47.2% 56.7% 51.8% 58.4% 36.5%
21 2012 35/36 4.6 4.3 57.8% 65.0% 45.4% 53.3% 48.4% 56.5% 40.2% 2012 3/3 4.3 5.3 54.2% 63.3% 37.5% 56.3% 42.1% 51.1% 33.1%
22 2013 16/19 4.2 5.4 60.1% 62.7% 45.0% 52.2% 33.9% 55.5% 40.1% 2013 1/1 2.0 4.0 52.5% 57.1% 26.3% 20.0% 0.0% 42.5% 28.3%
23 2014 7/9 3.7 4.0 53.2% 61.9% 39.2% 50.3% 47.2% 51.5% 35.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2015 6/8 4.2 5.3 56.0% 64.0% 40.8% 47.3% 50.6% 54.3% 30.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 2016 6/6 4.0 4.7 66.0% 62.8% 47.5% 57.2% 40.4% 57.6% 39.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 2017 10/10 3.4 2.7 68.9% 66.1% 50.3% 55.1% 51.5% 61.0% 45.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2018 43/43 3.2 2.2 62.8% 66.7% 48.8% 56.4% 43.9% 60.2% 42.8% 2018 3/3 5.0 3.0 51.3% 72.9% 53.6% 69.0% 72.2% 63.6% 40.6%
28 2019 52/53 2.6 2.7 64.0% 66.8% 49.8% 59.9% 49.1% 60.7% 44.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2020 25/25 3.2 2.6 61.7% 65.2% 50.7% 64.0% 39.1% 59.6% 41.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2021 36/36 3.8 2.8 58.8% 66.3% 46.7% 51.1% 43.6% 58.1% 39.1% 2021 9/9 6.4 1.6 56.4% 71.1% 47.5% 46.0% 31.2% 60.8% 39.0%
31 2022 42/42 4.5 3.3 60.1% 67.7% 49.2% 48.0% 43.3% 60.1% 40.9% 2022 26/26 6.7 2.7 57.5% 69.3% 51.2% 56.2% 41.3% 61.7% 40.2%
32 2023 38/39 4.8 3.4 57.1% 68.6% 47.9% 56.2% 40.1% 60.0% 39.8% 2023 25/25 6.9 3.8 58.2% 66.4% 41.2% 53.2% 36.3% 55.9% 35.7%
33 2024 27/28 4.4 3.5 58.8% 67.3% 42.8% 47.6% 49.7% 57.1% 37.9% 2024 7/7 5.3 4.1 51.8% 62.7% 41.9% 41.2% 35.6% 52.9% 37.1%
34 2025 3/7 1.7 3.7 62.1% 57.5% 38.4% 45.6% 35.6% 50.5% 41.2% 2025 5/9 6.8 3.4 56.9% 63.4% 41.9% 46.6% 35.1% 54.2% 40.6%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2026 1/1 10.0 7.0 55.7% 71.8% 41.9% 62.5% 16.7% 58.6% 37.5%
Career — 406/427 3.7 3.4 60.3% 65.9% 47.2% 54.3% 44.1% 58.4% 40.8% — 117/126 6.6 3.3 56.6% 67.8% 46.1% 54.7% 41.6% 58.3% 37.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Petra Martic Rebecca Marino
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 2007 1480 97.4 -1.36 -1.85 1.117 51.0% — — — 33.3% -0.33 0–1 0–1 — +0.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2008 1506 104.8 -0.42 +0.18 1.145 53.2% +19 — — 62.5% +0.63 1–1 1–0 — +0.27 2008 1502 100.0 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.50 — 1–0 — +0.22
18 2009 1539 112.1 +0.24 -2.39 0.933 48.5% +1 +22 — 50.0% -0.21 0–2 2–1 (67%) — +0.36 2009 1503 99.0 -1.15 -0.54 0.714 46.9% — — — 50.0% -0.50 — — — +0.26
19 2010 1517 116.5 -0.78 -3.50 0.832 46.5% +35 -37 — 31.8% -1.23 4–4 (50%) 4–4 (50%) 102.7 -0.85 2010 1551 121.9 +3.02 -0.35 1.083 50.9% +27 — — 54.5% +0.46 1–0 2–2 (50%) — -0.02
20 2011 1622 125.1 +0.45 -1.86 0.961 48.9% +17 -104 — 51.4% +0.07 10–4 (71%) 4–0 (100%) 111.1 +0.97 2011 1562 121.1 +1.67 -5.16 0.879 48.1% -5 +10 +47 44.0% -0.27 6–5 (55%) 3–4 (43%) 102.0 +0.64
21 2012 1692 131.0 +0.67 -2.20 0.926 48.6% -8 -98 — 48.8% -0.17 8–4 (67%) 3–6 (33%) 104.8 -1.21 2012 1531 101.0 -2.11 -2.45 0.677 42.9% -16 — — 0.0% -2.67 — — — -0.30
22 2013 1607 115.3 -1.25 -2.67 0.900 48.0% -10 -6 +18 41.9% -0.47 3–4 (43%) 2–3 (40%) 99.1 -0.05 2013 1523 99.9 -0.72 -1.42 0.492 34.4% — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.09
23 2014 1516 93.7 -1.25 -4.62 0.729 43.8% +28 — — 17.6% -2.53 0–1 1–1 — +0.24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2015 1435 105.3 -1.11 -3.28 0.673 43.0% +70 +50 — 0.0% -3.06 — — — -0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2016 1525 114.6 -0.08 -2.76 0.925 48.4% — +9 — 46.7% -0.53 2–1 (67%) 1–0 — -0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2017 1613 126.9 +3.55 +1.52 1.162 53.0% — +3 +54 60.0% +0.96 2–3 (40%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2018 1798 139.6 +3.00 +0.36 1.076 51.1% -18 -100 -125 58.3% +0.55 8–4 (67%) 6–4 (60%) 106.6 -0.04 2018 1547 106.2 -1.33 -1.49 1.116 52.0% -22 — — 57.1% +1.14 1–0 0–1 — +0.20
28 2019 1901 146.2 +3.96 +1.65 1.124 52.4% -93 +30 -139 58.5% +0.79 15–3 (83%) 4–6 (40%) 110.1 -0.27 2019 1531 — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2020 1805 132.1 +1.70 -1.09 1.032 50.6% -35 +79 — 56.7% +0.28 4–6 (40%) 7–3 (70%) 98.0 +1.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2021 1657 123.5 +1.00 -2.75 0.932 48.5% -33 +198 +99 43.7% -0.22 7–8 (47%) 4–8 (33%) 94.0 +2.13 2021 1562 122.5 +1.57 -0.55 0.994 49.3% -18 — — 45.0% -0.65 1–1 1–1 — 0.00
31 2022 1796 134.2 +2.70 -0.72 1.026 50.4% -88 +143 -60 56.3% +0.31 8–4 (67%) 10–5 (67%) 107.9 +0.20 2022 1688 123.8 +2.87 -2.02 1.048 50.8% -3 — -51 50.0% +0.02 3–7 (30%) 4–3 (57%) 98.9 +1.40
32 2023 1807 141.5 +3.00 -1.92 0.994 49.7% -62 +90 +3 47.1% -0.20 8–5 (62%) 5–6 (45%) 103.2 -0.59 2023 1586 119.8 -0.86 -5.13 0.809 46.0% +6 -46 -9 33.3% -1.30 2–5 (29%) 7–4 (64%) 97.1 -0.07
33 2024 1636 121.5 +0.25 -3.87 0.883 47.5% -6 +131 +180 35.4% -0.94 4–5 (44%) 3–3 (50%) 97.0 +0.09 2024 1678 109.7 -1.30 -2.06 0.788 45.3% +18 — — 20.0% -1.80 0–1 — — -0.34
34 2025 1607 111.0 -0.30 -0.75 0.832 45.5% -40 +116 — 47.4% -0.53 2–3 (40%) 0–1 — +0.57 2025 1620 115.9 -1.68 -1.01 0.886 47.3% -27 — — 38.1% -0.62 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — -0.01
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2026 1603 104.4 +1.06 -1.78 0.905 47.3% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.07
Career — 1938 136.0 +1.65 -1.36 0.980 49.5% -28 +38 -14 48.7% -0.08 86–63 (58%) 58–54 (52%) 109.3 +0.72 — 1727 123.8 +0.88 -3.23 0.900 48.1% -4 -11 -4 40.9% -0.58 15–21 (42%) 19–16 (54%) 100.1 +1.44

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.