H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 04:30 UTC
Petra Martic vs Su-Wei Hsieh H2H: 2-1
Petra Martic holds a 2–1 lead over Su-Wei Hsieh in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Petra Martic leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Petra Martic won the 2020 Dubai third round 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CRO
Age 35
Right-Handed
181 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
TPE
Age 40
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 19, 2020* | Dubai | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Petra Martic | 6-4 6-3 | Su-Wei Hsieh | Match data |
| May 4, 2012* | Budapest | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Petra Martic | 6-4 6-1 | Su-Wei Hsieh | Match data |
| Mar 4, 2012* | Kuala Lumpur | WTA 250 | F | Hard | Su-Wei Hsieh | 2-6 7-5 4-1 (ret.) | Petra Martic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Petra Martic | #349 | #14 | 2,850 | 1,942 | 212 | 214 | 49.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Su-Wei Hsieh | #909 | #23 | 1,960 | 1,874 | 150 | 173 | 46.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Petra Martic | Su-Wei Hsieh | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 5–2 | 71.4% | #164 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #330 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #267 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2008 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #215 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2009 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #82 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2010 | 5–14 | 26.3% | #142 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #142 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2011 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #50 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #129 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2012 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,690 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #157 | 1,419 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2013 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #107 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #81 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2014 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #186 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #314 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2015 | 0–8 | 0.0% | #148 | 1,435 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #362 | 1,455 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2016 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #262 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #172 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2017 | 6–4 | 60.0% | #89 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 22–13 | 62.9% | #25 | 1,689 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2018 | 26–17 | 60.5% | #32 | 1,795 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 13–25 | 34.2% | #86 | 1,558 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2019 | 36–17 | 67.9% | #15 | 1,903 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #141 | 1,545 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2020 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #18 | 1,805 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #93 | 1,583 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2021 | 15–21 | 41.7% | #54 | 1,658 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #87 | 1,588 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2022 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #38 | 1,794 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #82 | 1,600 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 2023 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #40 | 1,808 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 30–16 | 65.2% | #28 | 1,768 | 0 | 3 |
| 33 | 2024 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #122 | 1,649 | 0 | 2 | 2019 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #32 | 1,777 | 0 | 3 |
| 34 | 2025 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #209 | 1,611 | 0 | 2 | 2020 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #67 | 1,703 | 0 | 3 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #108 | 1,686 | 0 | 3 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #713 | 1,658 | 0 | 3 |