H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 04:32 UTC

Polona Hercog vs Su-Wei Hsieh H2H: 1-3

Su-Wei Hsieh holds a 3–1 lead over Polona Hercog in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Su-Wei Hsieh leads 3–0 on hard courts, while Polona Hercog leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Su-Wei Hsieh won the 2019 Auckland third round 6-2 6-3.

SLO Age 35 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1 3
4 main draw meetings
TPE Age 40 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 3, 2019* Auckland WTA 250 R32 Hard Su-Wei Hsieh #28 6-2 6-3 Polona Hercog #85 Match data
Sep 13, 2018* Hiroshima WTA 250 R32 Hard Su-Wei Hsieh #40 4-6 6-1 6-3 Polona Hercog #77 Match data
Apr 12, 2018* Lugano WTA 250 R32 Clay Polona Hercog #80 7-5 6-0 Su-Wei Hsieh #60 Match data
Jan 8, 2016 Sydney WTA 500 Q2 Q Hard Polona Hercog #73 6-1 7-5 Su-Wei Hsieh #93 Match data
Sep 17, 2015* Tokyo WTA 500 R32 Hard Su-Wei Hsieh #113 6-1 5-7 7-5 Polona Hercog #59 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Polona Hercog #228 #35 1,605 1,768 170 212 44.5% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Su-Wei Hsieh #909 #23 1,960 1,874 150 173 46.4% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Polona Hercog Su-Wei Hsieh
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 2001 5–2 71.4% #164 1,549 0 0
16 2007 0–1 0.0% #375 1,488 0 0 2002 0–1 0.0% #267 1,541 0 0
17 2008 0–2 0.0% #245 1,470 0 0
18 2009 6–8 42.9% #68 1,501 0 0
19 2010 26–24 52.0% #47 1,671 0 0 2005 0–3 0.0% #142 1,506 0 0
20 2011 27–25 51.9% #36 1,699 0 1 2006 0–4 0.0% #129 1,462 0 0
21 2012 14–20 41.2% #76 1,676 0 2 2007 1–7 12.5% #157 1,419 0 0
22 2013 10–10 50.0% #65 1,701 0 2 2008 5–8 38.5% #81 1,483 0 0
23 2014 12–16 42.9% #97 1,647 0 2 2009 1–2 33.3% #314 1,474 0 0
24 2015 19–23 45.2% #73 1,609 0 2 2010 0–2 0.0% #362 1,455 0 0
25 2016 10–16 38.5% #143 1,573 0 2 2011 1–1 50.0% #172 1,460 0 0
26 2017 2–2 50.0% #101 1,584 0 2 2012 22–13 62.9% #25 1,689 0 2
27 2018 15–19 44.1% #85 1,626 0 2 2013 13–25 34.2% #86 1,558 0 2
28 2019 19–21 47.5% #49 1,714 0 3 2014 6–12 33.3% #141 1,545 0 2
29 2020 6–8 42.9% #49 1,683 0 3 2015 6–5 54.5% #93 1,583 0 2
30 2021 4–15 21.1% #134 1,590 0 3 2016 12–12 50.0% #87 1,588 0 2
31 2017 8–15 34.8% #82 1,600 0 2
32 2023 0–1 0.0% #267 1,565 0 3 2018 30–16 65.2% #28 1,768 0 3
33 2019 30–23 56.6% #32 1,777 0 3
34 2020 1–7 12.5% #67 1,703 0 3
35 2026 0–1 0.0% #228 1,628 0 3 2021 9–14 39.1% #108 1,686 0 3
37 2023 0–1 0.0% #713 1,658 0 3