H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 04:33 UTC
Qinwen Zheng vs Jaqueline Cristian H2H: 2-2
Qinwen Zheng and Jaqueline Cristian are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Jaqueline Cristian leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Jaqueline Cristian won the 2026 Queens third round 6-4 7-6(4).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHN
Age 23
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
ROU
Age 28
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 8, 2026 | Queens | WTA 500 | R32 | Grass | Jaqueline Cristian | 6-4 7-6(4) | Qinwen Zheng | Match data |
| Oct 10, 2024* | Wuhan | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Qinwen Zheng | 6-2 6-4 | Jaqueline Cristian | Match data |
| Jul 20, 2024* | Palermo | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Qinwen Zheng | 6-1 6-1 | Jaqueline Cristian | Match data |
| Jul 23, 2021* | Palermo | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Jaqueline Cristian | 6-1 6-4 | Qinwen Zheng | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qinwen Zheng | #135 | #5 | 5,340 | 2,075 | 131 | 79 | 62.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4 |
| Jaqueline Cristian | #36 | #28 | 1,437 | 1,861 | 89 | 89 | 50.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Qinwen Zheng | Jaqueline Cristian | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2021 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #126 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2022 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #28 | 1,829 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #226 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2023 | 35–19 | 64.8% | #15 | 1,983 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2024 | 42–17 | 71.2% | #5 | 2,060 | 0 | 4 | 2019 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #211 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2025 | 20–12 | 62.5% | #24 | 1,996 | 0 | 4 | 2020 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #168 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2026 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #135 | 1,882 | 0 | 4 | 2021 | 15–9 | 62.5% | #71 | 1,722 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #146 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #89 | 1,659 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #85 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 25–21 | 54.3% | #39 | 1,796 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #36 | 1,819 | 0 | 0 |