H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC
Qinwen Zheng vs Magdalena Frech H2H: 2-1
Qinwen Zheng holds a 2–1 lead over Magdalena Frech in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Qinwen Zheng leads 1–0 on clay, while Magdalena Frech leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Qinwen Zheng won the 2025 Rome third round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHN
Age 23
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
POL
Age 28
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 11, 2025 | Rome | WTA 1000 | R32 | Clay | Qinwen Zheng | 6-3 6-2 | Magdalena Frech | Match data |
| Aug 16, 2024* | Cincinnati | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Qinwen Zheng | 6-1 7-5 | Magdalena Frech | Match data |
| Jun 22, 2022* | Eastbourne | WTA 500 | R64 | Grass | Magdalena Frech | 6-3 6-0 | Qinwen Zheng | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qinwen Zheng | #135 | #5 | 5,340 | 2,075 | 131 | 79 | 62.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4 |
| Magdalena Frech | #44 | #22 | 2,020 | 1,874 | 86 | 131 | 39.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Qinwen Zheng | Magdalena Frech | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #520 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #490 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2021 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #126 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2022 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #28 | 1,829 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #172 | 1,434 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2023 | 35–19 | 64.8% | #15 | 1,983 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #160 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2024 | 42–17 | 71.2% | #5 | 2,060 | 0 | 4 | 2019 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #188 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2025 | 20–12 | 62.5% | #24 | 1,996 | 0 | 4 | 2020 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #156 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2026 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #135 | 1,882 | 0 | 4 | 2021 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #106 | 1,702 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #106 | 1,688 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #74 | 1,687 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 29–25 | 53.7% | #25 | 1,845 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 15–25 | 37.5% | #59 | 1,748 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #44 | 1,682 | 0 | 1 |