H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Rebecca Marino vs Bethanie Mattek-Sands H2H: 0-1

Bethanie Mattek-Sands holds a 1–0 lead over Rebecca Marino in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Bethanie Mattek-Sands leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Bethanie Mattek-Sands won the 2010 Quebec City quarterfinal 6-4 7-6(4).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Rebecca Marino
Canada Age 35 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Bethanie Mattek-Sands
United States Age 41 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Bethanie Mattek-Sands #71 6-4 7-6(4) Rebecca Marino #153 Match data Sep 18, 2010* QF Quebec City International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Rebecca Marino #422 #38 1,322 1,726 48 78 38.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bethanie Mattek-Sands #1,356 #30 1,643 1,779 132 171 43.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Rebecca Marino Bethanie Mattek-Sands
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 2001 0–2 0.0% #343 1,471 0 0
17 2008 1–1 50.0% #356 1,501 0 0 2002 0–1 0.0% #214 1,470 0 0
18 2009 1–1 50.0% #178 1,502 0 0 2003 0–5 0.0% #158 1,428 0 0
19 2010 3–2 60.0% #104 1,550 0 0 2004 2–3 40.0% #172 1,445 0 0
20 2011 14–19 42.4% #64 1,561 0 0 2005 3–3 50.0% #123 1,488 0 0
21 2012 0–3 0.0% #420 1,530 0 0 2006 9–12 42.9% #126 1,571 0 0
22 2013 0–1 0.0% #418 1,522 0 0 2007 6–8 42.9% #114 1,590 0 0
23 — — — — — — — 2008 19–14 57.6% #39 1,700 0 0
24 — — — — — — — 2009 7–14 33.3% #153 1,624 0 0
25 — — — — — — — 2010 14–13 51.9% #58 1,706 0 0
26 — — — — — — — 2011 18–14 56.2% #55 1,709 0 0
27 2018 2–1 66.7% #215 1,547 0 0 2012 5–9 35.7% #169 1,667 0 0
28 — — — — — — — 2013 16–15 51.6% #48 1,691 0 0
29 — — — — — — — 2014 3–9 25.0% #177 1,611 0 0
30 2021 4–5 44.4% #145 1,561 0 0 2015 14–14 50.0% #60 1,680 0 0
31 2022 12–14 46.2% #63 1,688 0 0 2016 5–15 25.0% #178 1,579 0 0
32 2023 7–18 28.0% #176 1,586 0 0 2017 7–7 50.0% #123 1,672 0 0
33 2024 1–6 14.3% #102 1,677 0 0 2018 1–6 14.3% #350 1,607 0 0
34 2025 3–6 33.3% #178 1,619 0 0 2019 1–3 25.0% #370 1,588 0 0
35 2026 0–1 0.0% #422 1,603 0 0 2020 0–1 0.0% #338 1,609 0 0
36 — — — — — — — 2021 2–2 50.0% #368 1,599 0 0
38 — — — — — — — 2023 0–1 0.0% #1360 1,546 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Rebecca Marino Bethanie Mattek-Sands
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 2008 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2009 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 2010 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2011 9 13 22 40.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2005 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2012 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 5 4 9 55.6% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
22 2013 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 10 7 17 58.8% 2 5 7 28.6% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — —
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 4 6 10 40.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 9 7 16 56.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 8 7 15 53.3% 7 5 12 58.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0%
27 2018 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 3 7 10 30.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 8 10 18 44.4% 8 4 12 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 3 9 12 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2021 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 8 7 15 53.3% 4 6 10 40.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
31 2022 10 9 19 52.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 2016 3 10 13 23.1% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
32 2023 4 12 16 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 2017 3 4 7 42.9% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
33 2024 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2018 0 3 3 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — —
34 2025 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2026 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 37 59 96 38.5% 3 7 10 30.0% 8 12 20 40.0% — — — — — 77 105 182 42.3% 38 48 86 44.2% 13 15 28 46.4% 4 3 7 57.1%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 117/124 of Rebecca Marino's and 249/290 of Bethanie Mattek-Sands's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Rebecca Marino Bethanie Mattek-Sands
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 2009 2/2 8.5 0.5 62.3% 63.7% 49.0% 63.9% 66.7% 58.1% 29.9% 2003 1/5 1.0 3.0 54.7% 56.1% 35.3% 20.0% 61.5% 46.7% 49.4%
19 2010 5/5 9.2 2.4 57.1% 77.2% 48.4% 78.1% 26.7% 64.7% 38.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2011 30/33 6.5 3.6 55.9% 67.5% 47.2% 56.7% 51.8% 58.4% 36.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2012 3/3 4.3 5.3 54.2% 63.3% 37.5% 56.3% 42.1% 51.1% 33.1% 2006 13/21 3.3 2.6 58.5% 64.2% 43.2% 51.7% 42.0% 55.3% 42.2%
22 2013 1/1 2.0 4.0 52.5% 57.1% 26.3% 20.0% 0.0% 42.5% 28.3% 2007 13/14 2.2 1.5 57.7% 66.3% 49.3% 46.9% 43.7% 58.9% 41.2%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 23/33 1.6 3.7 64.3% 62.9% 46.1% 64.0% 47.4% 56.9% 45.5%
24 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 20/21 1.7 2.4 63.3% 57.7% 45.5% 46.1% 46.9% 52.9% 41.6%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 26/27 2.2 2.0 61.3% 64.4% 51.1% 59.0% 47.7% 59.3% 45.0%
26 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 30/32 1.8 2.9 58.9% 62.7% 47.4% 46.8% 49.5% 56.3% 46.5%
27 2018 3/3 5.0 3.0 51.3% 72.9% 53.6% 69.0% 72.2% 63.6% 40.6% 2012 13/14 3.1 2.8 51.1% 68.5% 44.4% 54.8% 52.0% 56.7% 40.9%
28 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 27/31 2.4 3.0 54.9% 68.8% 47.6% 53.9% 48.4% 58.9% 43.9%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2014 12/12 2.4 3.1 58.1% 60.2% 43.1% 50.7% 45.1% 53.1% 43.9%
30 2021 9/9 6.4 1.6 56.4% 71.1% 47.5% 46.0% 31.2% 60.8% 39.0% 2015 21/28 1.7 3.3 61.5% 63.6% 51.1% 55.5% 52.4% 58.9% 41.4%
31 2022 26/26 6.7 2.7 57.5% 69.3% 51.2% 56.2% 41.3% 61.7% 40.2% 2016 20/21 2.2 4.2 56.6% 62.3% 45.1% 47.9% 43.6% 54.9% 41.5%
32 2023 25/25 6.9 3.8 58.2% 66.4% 41.2% 53.2% 36.3% 55.9% 35.7% 2017 13/14 1.8 2.9 55.0% 61.5% 45.4% 57.9% 49.2% 53.6% 45.2%
33 2024 7/7 5.3 4.1 51.8% 62.7% 41.9% 41.2% 35.6% 52.9% 37.1% 2018 7/7 1.9 3.1 55.8% 61.6% 47.2% 57.8% 36.8% 54.9% 36.7%
34 2025 5/9 6.8 3.4 56.9% 63.4% 41.9% 46.6% 35.1% 54.2% 40.6% 2019 4/4 1.0 1.0 59.9% 59.5% 37.2% 43.1% 30.6% 50.5% 37.4%
35 2026 1/1 10.0 7.0 55.7% 71.8% 41.9% 62.5% 16.7% 58.6% 37.5% 2020 1/1 0.0 2.0 68.9% 52.4% 42.1% 50.0% 50.0% 49.2% 38.2%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 4/4 4.8 2.0 63.2% 64.2% 49.7% 62.7% 52.8% 58.9% 38.5%
38 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2023 1/1 1.0 2.0 58.7% 40.7% 21.1% 22.2% 75.0% 32.6% 46.3%
Career — 117/126 6.6 3.3 56.6% 67.8% 46.1% 54.7% 41.6% 58.3% 37.5% — 249/304 2.1 2.8 58.9% 63.4% 46.8% 53.0% 47.3% 56.3% 43.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Rebecca Marino Bethanie Mattek-Sands
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1472 97.6 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–2 — — +0.24
17 2008 1502 100.0 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.50 — 1–0 — +0.22 2002 1471 102.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -6.00 — — — -0.24
18 2009 1503 99.0 -1.15 -0.54 0.714 46.9% — — — 50.0% -0.50 — — — +0.26 2003 1428 97.9 -0.28 +0.13 0.926 48.1% +37 — — 23.1% -2.08 0–3 (0%) 1–1 — -0.11
19 2010 1551 121.9 +3.02 -0.35 1.083 50.9% +27 — — 54.5% +0.46 1–0 2–2 (50%) — -0.02 2004 1446 108.5 — — — — +27 — — 41.7% -0.09 1–1 0–3 (0%) — +0.26
20 2011 1562 121.1 +1.67 -5.16 0.879 48.1% -5 +10 +47 44.0% -0.27 6–5 (55%) 3–4 (43%) 102.0 +0.64 2005 1489 107.8 — — — — +15 — — 33.3% -1.42 2–0 1–0 — -0.17
21 2012 1531 101.0 -2.11 -2.45 0.677 42.9% -16 — — 0.0% -2.67 — — — -0.30 2006 1572 122.2 +0.43 -1.68 0.943 48.6% +8 -91 +26 43.1% -0.39 5–4 (56%) 0–3 (0%) 100.0 -0.91
22 2013 1523 99.9 -0.72 -1.42 0.492 34.4% — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.09 2007 1591 123.2 +1.17 -0.38 1.004 49.7% +13 — +9 40.7% -0.26 0–1 0–2 — -0.75
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1701 126.2 +0.68 +1.30 1.057 51.4% -35 -233 +73 57.1% +0.42 5–6 (45%) 6–6 (50%) 100.5 +1.78
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1625 117.3 -1.61 -0.51 0.884 47.3% +19 -138 — 36.2% -1.00 2–3 (40%) 3–3 (50%) 100.2 -1.14
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1706 132.3 +2.85 +1.63 1.105 52.1% -12 -173 -19 53.8% +0.32 4–7 (36%) 1–4 (20%) 95.8 -1.05
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1710 132.8 +1.02 +2.01 1.066 51.4% -2 -69 — 53.9% +0.33 7–7 (50%) 4–3 (57%) 101.1 -0.55
27 2018 1547 106.2 -1.33 -1.49 1.116 52.0% -22 — — 57.1% +1.14 1–0 0–1 — +0.20 2012 1667 120.6 +0.55 -1.32 0.945 48.5% -24 — — 43.8% -0.37 0–4 (0%) 2–0 — -1.24
28 2019 1531 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1691 135.2 +2.51 +1.00 1.067 51.5% -81 +69 — 52.1% +0.58 6–5 (55%) 2–3 (40%) 100.2 -0.57
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1611 124.9 -0.22 +1.80 0.936 48.9% -60 — — 38.5% -0.69 0–4 (0%) 0–1 — -0.42
30 2021 1562 122.5 +1.57 -0.55 0.994 49.3% -18 — — 45.0% -0.65 1–1 1–1 — 0.00 2015 1680 127.9 +0.59 +0.51 1.006 50.5% -53 -16 -8 50.7% +0.25 5–6 (45%) 3–4 (43%) 98.7 +0.68
31 2022 1688 123.8 +2.87 -2.02 1.048 50.8% -3 — -51 50.0% +0.02 3–7 (30%) 4–3 (57%) 98.9 +1.40 2016 1580 121.1 -1.28 -1.16 0.918 48.2% -19 +56 — 37.7% -0.77 3–10 (23%) 4–2 (67%) 96.4 -1.05
32 2023 1586 119.8 -0.86 -5.13 0.809 46.0% +6 -46 -9 33.3% -1.30 2–5 (29%) 7–4 (64%) 97.1 -0.07 2017 1673 126.6 -1.67 +2.39 0.975 49.6% -21 +4 — 50.0% -0.17 3–1 (75%) 2–0 — -0.16
33 2024 1678 109.7 -1.30 -2.06 0.788 45.3% +18 — — 20.0% -1.80 0–1 — — -0.34 2018 1608 112.8 0.00 -2.91 0.814 46.1% +12 +23 — 25.0% -1.44 0–2 0–3 (0%) — -0.29
34 2025 1620 115.9 -1.68 -1.01 0.886 47.3% -27 — — 38.1% -0.62 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — -0.01 2019 1589 112.7 -1.45 -1.61 0.756 43.6% -1 — — 30.0% -1.50 1–1 0–1 — -0.11
35 2026 1603 104.4 +1.06 -1.78 0.905 47.3% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.07 2020 1609 112.8 -0.17 +0.01 0.752 43.4% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — 0–1 — +0.19
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1599 112.0 +0.16 -1.07 0.936 50.3% +10 — — 44.4% +0.22 1–0 1–1 — +0.19
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1587 101.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1546 101.7 -1.87 -2.19 0.688 39.1% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.04
39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1533 97.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 1531 101.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1727 123.8 +0.88 -3.23 0.900 48.1% -4 -11 -4 40.9% -0.58 15–21 (42%) 19–16 (54%) 100.1 +1.44 — 1779 132.2 +0.56 +0.45 0.989 49.8% -20 -58 +32 46.0% -0.19 45–67 (40%) 30–41 (42%) 92.4 -1.80

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.