H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Rebecca Marino vs Coco Vandeweghe H2H: 2-0

Rebecca Marino holds a 2–0 lead over Coco Vandeweghe in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Rebecca Marino leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Rebecca Marino won the 2011 Stanford round of 32 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Rebecca Marino
Canada Age 35 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main-draw meetings
Coco Vandeweghe
USA Age 34 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Rebecca Marino #41 6-4 6-4 Coco Vandeweghe #99 Match data Jul 28, 2011* R32 Stanford Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Rebecca Marino #80 6-1 7-6(6) Coco Vandeweghe #106 Match data Feb 19, 2011* QF Memphis Classic International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Rebecca Marino #422 #38 1,322 1,726 48 78 38.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Coco Vandeweghe #815 #9 3,258 1,880 138 152 47.6% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Rebecca Marino Coco Vandeweghe
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 2006 0–1 0.0% — 1,484 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 2007 0–1 0.0% #549 1,479 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 2008 0–3 0.0% #476 1,453 0 0
17 2008 1–1 50.0% #356 1,501 0 0 2009 1–2 33.3% #322 1,465 0 0
18 2009 1–1 50.0% #178 1,502 0 0 2010 6–6 50.0% #116 1,567 0 0
19 2010 3–2 60.0% #104 1,550 0 0 2011 8–13 38.1% #122 1,543 0 0
20 2011 14–19 42.4% #64 1,561 0 0 2012 6–7 46.2% #97 1,605 0 0
21 2012 0–3 0.0% #420 1,530 0 0 2013 5–11 31.2% #113 1,563 0 0
22 2013 0–1 0.0% #418 1,522 0 0 2014 22–14 61.1% #39 1,731 0 1
23 — — — — — — — 2015 20–21 48.8% #37 1,726 0 1
24 — — — — — — — 2016 22–18 55.0% #36 1,732 0 2
25 — — — — — — — 2017 29–18 61.7% #10 1,858 0 2
26 — — — — — — — 2018 9–16 36.0% #100 1,690 0 2
27 2018 2–1 66.7% #215 1,547 0 0 2019 1–3 25.0% #241 1,689 0 2
28 — — — — — — — 2020 0–2 0.0% #214 1,624 0 2
29 — — — — — — — 2021 4–9 30.8% #174 1,591 0 2
30 2021 4–5 44.4% #145 1,561 0 0 2022 4–5 44.4% #128 1,666 0 2
31 2022 12–14 46.2% #63 1,688 0 0 2023 1–2 33.3% #420 1,533 0 2
32 2023 7–18 28.0% #176 1,586 0 0 — — — — — — —
33 2024 1–6 14.3% #102 1,677 0 0 — — — — — — —
34 2025 3–6 33.3% #178 1,619 0 0 — — — — — — —
35 2026 0–1 0.0% #422 1,603 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Rebecca Marino Coco Vandeweghe
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 2008 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2009 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
18 2009 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2010 6 6 12 50.0% — — — — — — — —
19 2010 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — 2011 7 9 16 43.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
20 2011 9 13 22 40.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2012 6 6 12 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
21 2012 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2013 5 7 12 41.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
22 2013 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2014 13 11 24 54.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 8 2 10 80.0%
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 10 13 23 43.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 8 4 12 66.7%
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 10 13 23 43.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 11 2 13 84.6%
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 19 12 31 61.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 6 3 9 66.7%
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1 9 10 10.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 3 3 6 50.0%
27 2018 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — 2019 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — —
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 0 5 5 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
30 2021 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — — — — — 2022 1 2 3 33.3% 3 1 4 75.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
31 2022 10 9 19 52.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 2023 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
32 2023 4 12 16 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2024 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2025 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2026 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 37 59 96 38.5% 3 7 10 30.0% 8 12 20 40.0% — 81 107 188 43.1% 16 21 37 43.2% 41 24 65 63.1%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 117/124 of Rebecca Marino's and 279/290 of Coco Vandeweghe's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Rebecca Marino Coco Vandeweghe
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
14 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 1/1 2.0 2.0 40.4% 69.6% 38.2% 50.0% 100.0% 50.9% 26.1%
15 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 1/1 7.0 7.0 53.2% 75.8% 41.4% 62.5% 16.7% 59.7% 30.9%
16 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 3/3 1.3 2.3 58.0% 53.2% 40.3% 36.1% 50.7% 47.4% 37.5%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 3/3 3.7 0.0 64.6% 54.3% 58.5% 52.3% 36.7% 55.8% 36.4%
18 2009 2/2 8.5 0.5 62.3% 63.7% 49.0% 63.9% 66.7% 58.1% 29.9% 2010 11/12 4.5 5.5 58.9% 63.3% 38.8% 49.9% 47.6% 53.0% 42.0%
19 2010 5/5 9.2 2.4 57.1% 77.2% 48.4% 78.1% 26.7% 64.7% 38.2% 2011 21/21 3.9 5.3 52.3% 64.7% 44.8% 49.5% 41.2% 55.2% 39.7%
20 2011 30/33 6.5 3.6 55.9% 67.5% 47.2% 56.7% 51.8% 58.4% 36.5% 2012 12/13 5.7 5.1 48.8% 74.1% 45.6% 66.1% 63.0% 59.6% 40.2%
21 2012 3/3 4.3 5.3 54.2% 63.3% 37.5% 56.3% 42.1% 51.1% 33.1% 2013 16/16 5.8 4.9 49.7% 68.0% 46.7% 50.2% 43.9% 56.9% 41.9%
22 2013 1/1 2.0 4.0 52.5% 57.1% 26.3% 20.0% 0.0% 42.5% 28.3% 2014 36/36 8.5 4.6 53.3% 76.0% 47.8% 52.7% 45.7% 62.8% 40.3%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 34/41 6.8 3.6 54.9% 70.6% 56.0% 60.3% 42.3% 63.9% 37.0%
24 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 38/40 5.9 3.7 54.7% 72.8% 49.4% 54.0% 45.2% 62.3% 41.9%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 47/47 5.3 4.3 54.7% 74.4% 50.5% 61.6% 43.8% 63.6% 41.3%
26 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 25/25 5.9 5.2 54.5% 69.3% 46.5% 55.0% 43.6% 59.1% 38.2%
27 2018 3/3 5.0 3.0 51.3% 72.9% 53.6% 69.0% 72.2% 63.6% 40.6% 2019 4/4 3.5 5.0 45.4% 65.4% 40.8% 48.8% 24.6% 52.3% 35.4%
28 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 2/2 6.0 7.0 55.9% 70.7% 37.8% 64.6% 22.2% 56.1% 36.7%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 13/13 5.8 4.9 55.2% 66.9% 45.9% 39.1% 44.7% 57.6% 37.4%
30 2021 9/9 6.4 1.6 56.4% 71.1% 47.5% 46.0% 31.2% 60.8% 39.0% 2022 9/9 6.0 4.4 50.7% 69.4% 45.3% 48.0% 40.8% 57.5% 35.7%
31 2022 26/26 6.7 2.7 57.5% 69.3% 51.2% 56.2% 41.3% 61.7% 40.2% 2023 3/3 7.3 6.3 49.4% 66.2% 41.4% 41.5% 20.1% 53.6% 32.8%
32 2023 25/25 6.9 3.8 58.2% 66.4% 41.2% 53.2% 36.3% 55.9% 35.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2024 7/7 5.3 4.1 51.8% 62.7% 41.9% 41.2% 35.6% 52.9% 37.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2025 5/9 6.8 3.4 56.9% 63.4% 41.9% 46.6% 35.1% 54.2% 40.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2026 1/1 10.0 7.0 55.7% 71.8% 41.9% 62.5% 16.7% 58.6% 37.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 117/126 6.6 3.3 56.6% 67.8% 46.1% 54.7% 41.6% 58.3% 37.5% — 279/290 5.9 4.5 53.8% 70.7% 48.2% 54.6% 44.2% 60.2% 39.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Rebecca Marino Coco Vandeweghe
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1485 98.4 -1.31 -2.15 0.531 39.8% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.21
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1480 104.6 -2.63 -2.18 0.766 44.6% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.09
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1453 104.3 +0.09 -1.10 0.713 42.8% +20 — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.14
17 2008 1502 100.0 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.50 — 1–0 — +0.22 2009 1466 104.1 +1.17 -2.23 0.824 46.3% +13 — — 33.3% -1.83 — — — -0.10
18 2009 1503 99.0 -1.15 -0.54 0.714 46.9% — — — 50.0% -0.50 — — — +0.26 2010 1567 119.9 -0.34 -0.02 0.895 47.8% +7 — — 45.8% -0.83 1–1 1–1 — +0.28
19 2010 1551 121.9 +3.02 -0.35 1.083 50.9% +27 — — 54.5% +0.46 1–0 2–2 (50%) — -0.02 2011 1543 108.2 -1.37 -3.03 0.887 47.8% +26 — +40 34.8% -0.78 4–0 (100%) 1–5 (17%) 102.6 +1.49
20 2011 1562 121.1 +1.67 -5.16 0.879 48.1% -5 +10 +47 44.0% -0.27 6–5 (55%) 3–4 (43%) 102.0 +0.64 2012 1605 131.1 +3.23 -0.27 0.996 49.9% +24 — — 48.3% -0.10 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — -0.31
21 2012 1531 101.0 -2.11 -2.45 0.677 42.9% -16 — — 0.0% -2.67 — — — -0.30 2013 1563 120.9 +0.40 -1.77 0.973 49.4% +55 — — 37.8% -0.43 1–4 (20%) 2–4 (33%) 95.2 +0.12
22 2013 1523 99.9 -0.72 -1.42 0.492 34.4% — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.09 2014 1731 138.8 +5.61 -2.20 1.082 51.2% -19 — -18 55.7% +0.23 7–4 (64%) 7–6 (54%) 106.7 -0.26
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1726 124.1 +4.83 -2.53 1.026 50.3% -38 -235 +47 51.1% -0.08 8–6 (57%) 10–3 (77%) 107.1 -1.43
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1733 136.0 +5.07 -0.74 1.111 51.7% -68 -242 +155 56.2% +0.31 5–6 (45%) 5–4 (56%) 100.7 -0.72
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1859 148.2 +6.32 -0.55 1.133 51.9% -29 -280 +61 60.0% +0.45 6–6 (50%) 11–2 (85%) 108.7 -1.00
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1691 124.0 +2.04 -2.71 0.932 48.6% -31 -30 +160 43.4% -0.55 2–5 (29%) 6–5 (55%) 95.6 -0.76
27 2018 1547 106.2 -1.33 -1.49 1.116 52.0% -22 — — 57.1% +1.14 1–0 0–1 — +0.20 2019 1690 112.5 -0.39 -0.74 0.742 44.1% -7 — — 25.0% -1.63 — 0–1 — -0.01
28 2019 1531 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1624 102.4 -0.35 -1.49 0.835 46.5% — — — 20.0% -1.80 0–1 — — -0.12
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1591 99.2 -0.08 -3.74 0.881 47.2% -64 — +332 34.5% -1.10 1–2 (33%) 2–3 (40%) 96.4 +0.17
30 2021 1562 122.5 +1.57 -0.55 0.994 49.3% -18 — — 45.0% -0.65 1–1 1–1 — 0.00 2022 1667 108.1 +0.32 -2.42 0.840 46.3% -63 +2 — 36.4% -0.96 4–0 (100%) 0–1 — +0.03
31 2022 1688 123.8 +2.87 -2.02 1.048 50.8% -3 — -51 50.0% +0.02 3–7 (30%) 4–3 (57%) 98.9 +1.40 2023 1534 102.7 -1.75 -2.65 0.707 43.4% -15 — — 28.6% -1.72 1–0 1–1 — -0.10
32 2023 1586 119.8 -0.86 -5.13 0.809 46.0% +6 -46 -9 33.3% -1.30 2–5 (29%) 7–4 (64%) 97.1 -0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2024 1678 109.7 -1.30 -2.06 0.788 45.3% +18 — — 20.0% -1.80 0–1 — — -0.34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2025 1620 115.9 -1.68 -1.01 0.886 47.3% -27 — — 38.1% -0.62 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — -0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2026 1603 104.4 +1.06 -1.78 0.905 47.3% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1727 123.8 +0.88 -3.23 0.900 48.1% -4 -11 -4 40.9% -0.58 15–21 (42%) 19–16 (54%) 100.1 +1.44 — 1880 132.9 +3.27 -1.72 0.995 49.7% -17 -153 +106 47.8% -0.23 41–37 (53%) 46–37 (55%) 106.9 -0.94

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.