H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Rebecca Marino vs Galina Voskoboeva H2H: 0-1
Galina Voskoboeva holds a 1–0 lead over Rebecca Marino in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Galina Voskoboeva leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Galina Voskoboeva won the 2008 Quebec City fourth round 6-1 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CAN
Age 35
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
KAZ
Age 41
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 31, 2008* | Quebec City | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Galina Voskoboeva | 6-1 6-3 | Rebecca Marino | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rebecca Marino | #361 | #38 | 1,322 | 1,726 | 48 | 77 | 38.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Galina Voskoboeva | #1,417 | #42 | 1,284 | 1,701 | 70 | 120 | 36.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Rebecca Marino | Galina Voskoboeva | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2008 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #356 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2009 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #178 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2010 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #104 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #140 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2011 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #64 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #113 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2012 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #420 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 2–11 | 15.4% | #114 | 1,418 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #418 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #133 | 1,406 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #94 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #106 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #532 | 1,445 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 14–9 | 60.9% | #58 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2018 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #215 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #82 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #67 | 1,614 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #259 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2021 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #145 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2022 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #63 | 1,688 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #312 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2023 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #176 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #421 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 2024 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #102 | 1,683 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2025 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #178 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |