H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:32 UTC
Rebecca Marino vs Katarzyna Kawa H2H: 1-1
Rebecca Marino and Katarzyna Kawa are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Katarzyna Kawa leads 1–0 on grass, while Rebecca Marino leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Rebecca Marino won the 2022 Chennai fourth round 7-5 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CAN
Age 35
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
POL
Age 33
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 16, 2022* | Chennai | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Rebecca Marino | 7-5 6-3 | Katarzyna Kawa | Match data |
| Jun 29, 2022* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Katarzyna Kawa | 6-4 3-6 7-5 | Rebecca Marino | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rebecca Marino | #361 | #38 | 1,322 | 1,726 | 48 | 77 | 38.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Katarzyna Kawa | #142 | #112 | 656 | 1,720 | 20 | 24 | 45.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Rebecca Marino | Katarzyna Kawa | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2008 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #356 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2009 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #178 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2010 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #104 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2011 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #64 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2012 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #420 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #418 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #127 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2018 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #215 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #113 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #155 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #244 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2021 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #145 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #197 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2022 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #63 | 1,688 | 0 | 0 | 2024 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #228 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2023 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #176 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 2025 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #139 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 2024 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #102 | 1,683 | 0 | 0 | 2026 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #142 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | 2025 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #178 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |