Rebecca Peterson
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yulia Putintseva | 1 | 4 | 5 | Apr 22, 2022 | H2H |
| Camila Giorgi | 1 | 3 | 4 | Feb 26, 2023 | H2H |
| Magda Linette | 3 | 1 | 4 | Feb 25, 2023 | H2H |
| Elise Mertens | 1 | 3 | 4 | Apr 21, 2022 | H2H |
| Iga Swiatek | 0 | 3 | 3 | Aug 30, 2023 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC
Rebecca Peterson vs Daniela Seguel H2H: 1-0
Rebecca Peterson holds a 1–0 lead over Daniela Seguel in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Rebecca Peterson leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Rebecca Peterson won the 2016 Bogotá Open first round 6-3 4-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
1
–
0
1 main-draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rebecca Peterson | 6-3 4-6 6-3 | Daniela Seguel | Match data | Apr 14, 2016* | R32 | Bogotá Open | International → modern equivalent WTA 250 | Clay |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rebecca Peterson | #573 | #43 | 1,332 | 1,861 | 80 | 95 | 45.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Daniela Seguel | #951 | #162 | 365 | 1,528 | 3 | 4 | 42.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Rebecca Peterson | Daniela Seguel | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #263 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2014 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #230 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2015 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #131 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2016 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #146 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2017 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #174 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2018 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #63 | 1,693 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2019 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #44 | 1,861 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #237 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2020 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #55 | 1,697 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2021 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #88 | 1,699 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #282 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2022 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #119 | 1,659 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2023 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #127 | 1,647 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #204 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #405 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 |
Surface Results by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Rebecca Peterson | Daniela Seguel | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | |||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 16 | 2012 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2013 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2014 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2015 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2016 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2017 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2018 | 7 | 6 | 13 | 53.8% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2019 | 17 | 9 | 26 | 65.4% | 6 | 6 | 12 | 50.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 2016 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2020 | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2021 | 15 | 13 | 28 | 53.6% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 2018 | — | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2022 | 4 | 8 | 12 | 33.3% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2023 | 7 | 3 | 10 | 70.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 58 | 51 | 109 | 53.2% | 18 | 34 | 52 | 34.6% | 4 | 10 | 14 | 28.6% | — | — | — | — | — | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | — | — | — | — |
Performance Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 168/174 of Rebecca Peterson's and 7/7 of Daniela Seguel's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Rebecca Peterson | Daniela Seguel | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 17 | 2013 | 1/1 | 1.0 | 3.0 | 64.3% | 41.7% | 40.0% | 45.5% | 66.7% | 41.1% | 42.2% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2014 | 3/3 | 0.7 | 4.0 | 64.5% | 51.3% | 36.8% | 49.5% | 42.5% | 46.3% | 44.1% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2015 | 5/7 | 0.8 | 4.8 | 70.0% | 57.3% | 48.6% | 36.8% | 50.3% | 55.0% | 41.0% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2016 | 9/9 | 1.6 | 3.6 | 68.4% | 61.4% | 41.7% | 48.7% | 51.7% | 55.4% | 40.7% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2017 | 5/5 | 2.2 | 3.2 | 64.2% | 63.6% | 48.6% | 73.1% | 59.8% | 58.0% | 42.1% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2018 | 21/21 | 3.6 | 3.7 | 63.7% | 62.9% | 41.3% | 57.6% | 50.4% | 55.0% | 43.1% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2019 | 42/43 | 2.2 | 2.8 | 67.1% | 61.9% | 50.4% | 57.2% | 44.5% | 58.0% | 43.3% | 2016 | 1/1 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 72.1% | 51.6% | 45.8% | 53.3% | 55.6% | 50.0% | 42.7% |
| 24 | 2020 | 13/13 | 1.5 | 2.8 | 66.5% | 55.9% | 44.5% | 36.8% | 30.4% | 51.8% | 39.5% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2021 | 34/36 | 2.3 | 3.4 | 65.5% | 62.2% | 47.7% | 52.4% | 47.4% | 57.1% | 41.3% | 2018 | 3/3 | 0.7 | 1.7 | 75.3% | 56.7% | 35.6% | 62.4% | 43.8% | 51.8% | 49.1% |
| 26 | 2022 | 20/21 | 1.9 | 3.7 | 63.7% | 61.1% | 42.5% | 45.1% | 45.0% | 54.0% | 39.8% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2023 | 15/15 | 2.1 | 4.1 | 65.3% | 64.3% | 40.5% | 53.5% | 51.5% | 55.9% | 45.3% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 2/2 | 0.0 | 2.5 | 75.6% | 55.5% | 40.8% | 71.4% | 41.7% | 52.2% | 47.2% |
| 29 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 1/1 | 0.0 | 6.0 | 73.3% | 50.0% | 25.0% | 14.3% | 60.0% | 43.3% | 37.7% |
| Career | — | 168/175 | 2.2 | 3.4 | 65.7% | 61.3% | 45.5% | 52.1% | 46.5% | 55.8% | 42.1% | — | 7/7 | 0.4 | 2.6 | 74.6% | 54.7% | 37.0% | 56.8% | 47.2% | 50.4% | 46.0% |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Rebecca Peterson | Daniela Seguel | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 16 | 2012 | 1488 | 95.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.50 | — | — | — | -0.02 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2013 | 1485 | 102.5 | +3.18 | +1.91 | 0.716 | 41.7% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.00 | — | — | — | -0.28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2014 | 1490 | 101.8 | -1.67 | +0.24 | 0.821 | 45.5% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.50 | — | — | — | -0.10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2015 | 1505 | 104.6 | -0.71 | -1.19 | 0.911 | 47.7% | — | -1 | — | 37.5% | -1.06 | 2–0 | 1–1 | — | -0.09 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2016 | 1506 | 107.2 | -0.91 | -1.94 | 0.911 | 48.2% | +59 | -42 | — | 42.1% | -0.37 | 1–2 (33%) | 1–2 (33%) | — | +0.28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2017 | 1550 | 106.4 | +0.60 | -1.14 | 1.003 | 50.3% | +49 | — | — | 45.5% | -0.36 | 0–1 | 0–1 | — | -0.10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2018 | 1693 | 125.9 | -0.84 | -0.13 | 0.960 | 49.2% | +26 | -250 | -63 | 46.7% | -0.22 | 2–3 (40%) | 2–4 (33%) | 98.7 | +0.29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2019 | 1862 | 140.3 | +1.54 | +0.91 | 1.032 | 50.8% | -2 | -323 | -222 | 53.6% | +0.22 | 11–6 (65%) | 5–5 (50%) | 106.5 | -2.59 | 2016 | 1495 | 102.1 | -2.00 | -0.54 | 0.854 | 46.4% | — | — | — | 33.3% | -1.33 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.15 |
| 24 | 2020 | 1698 | 103.7 | -2.62 | -2.51 | 0.819 | 45.3% | +41 | -190 | — | 20.8% | -2.08 | 1–1 | 2–3 (40%) | — | +0.28 | 2017 | 1465 | 94.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2021 | 1700 | 129.0 | +0.81 | -0.92 | 0.963 | 49.2% | +11 | -79 | — | 49.4% | -0.04 | 6–7 (46%) | 6–6 (50%) | 103.0 | -0.71 | 2018 | 1478 | 97.2 | -3.67 | -0.05 | 1.017 | 50.3% | — | +15 | — | 66.7% | +1.00 | — | — | — | +0.27 |
| 26 | 2022 | 1659 | 117.2 | -1.27 | -2.53 | 0.866 | 47.2% | +49 | -54 | — | 33.3% | -0.89 | 2–3 (40%) | 1–2 (33%) | — | -0.50 | 2019 | 1462 | 97.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2023 | 1647 | 126.0 | -0.31 | +1.31 | 1.028 | 50.7% | +73 | -62 | — | 48.5% | +0.12 | 3–2 (60%) | 0–4 (0%) | 97.8 | -0.35 | 2020 | 1445 | 93.4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2024 | 1645 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 1473 | 103.9 | +0.09 | +1.01 | 0.988 | 49.8% | — | — | — | 40.0% | +0.20 | 1–0 | 0–1 | — | +0.08 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 1444 | 105.7 | -1.72 | -1.70 | 0.665 | 40.5% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.00 | — | — | — | +0.17 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 1442 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1862 | 129.7 | 0.00 | -0.51 | 0.952 | 49.0% | +25 | -149 | -151 | 44.3% | -0.36 | 28–25 (53%) | 18–28 (39%) | 101.5 | -2.22 | — | 1528 | 99.0 | -2.08 | -0.05 | 0.928 | 48.2% | — | +15 | — | 43.8% | -0.19 | 1–1 | 0–1 | — | +9.57 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Daniela Seguel
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ipek Oz | 0 | 1 | 1 | Apr 7, 2022 | H2H |
| Harmony Tan | 0 | 1 | 1 | Apr 9, 2021 | H2H |
| Clara Tauson | 1 | 0 | 1 | Apr 8, 2021 | H2H |
| Ana Bogdan | 0 | 1 | 1 | Apr 14, 2018 | H2H |
| Tatjana Maria | 1 | 0 | 1 | Apr 13, 2018 | H2H |