H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Rebecca Peterson vs Kateryna Baindl H2H: 2-0
Rebecca Peterson holds a 2–0 lead over Kateryna Baindl in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Rebecca Peterson leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Rebecca Peterson won the 2022 Hamburg third round 6-3 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SWE
Age 30
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
UKR
Age 32
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 20, 2022* | Hamburg | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Rebecca Peterson | 6-3 6-0 | Kateryna Baindl | Match data |
| Mar 5, 2020* | Monterrey | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Rebecca Peterson | 3-6 7-6(1) 6-4 | Kateryna Baindl | Match data |
| Sep 21, 2019 | Wuhan | WTA 1000 | Q2 | Hard | Kateryna Baindl | 6-1 4-6 7-5 | Rebecca Peterson | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rebecca Peterson | #573 | #43 | 1,332 | 1,863 | 79 | 93 | 45.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Kateryna Baindl | #467 | #62 | 922 | 1,730 | 75 | 107 | 41.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Rebecca Peterson | Kateryna Baindl | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #263 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2014 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #230 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2015 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #131 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #200 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2016 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #146 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #140 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2017 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #174 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #162 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2018 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #63 | 1,692 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 12–11 | 52.2% | #102 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2019 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #44 | 1,863 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #86 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2020 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #55 | 1,696 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #98 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2021 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #88 | 1,698 | 0 | 2 | 2019 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #91 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2022 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #119 | 1,659 | 0 | 2 | 2020 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #106 | 1,607 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2023 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #127 | 1,647 | 0 | 2 | 2021 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #144 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #99 | 1,678 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #132 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #445 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |