H2H data updated: 2026-08-15 02:40 UTC

Rebeka Masarova vs Alina Charaeva

Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Rebeka Masarova vs Alina Charaeva.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Rebeka Masarova
Switzerland Age 27 Right-Handed 186 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0 – 0
0 main draw meetings
Alina Charaeva
Armenia Age 24

H2H Match Log

WinnerScoreLoserMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
No head-to-head meetings found.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Rebeka Masarova #169 #62 982 1,801 37 46 44.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Alina Charaeva #114 #112 700 1,732 3 7 30.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Rebeka Masarova Alina Charaeva
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2016 3–1 75.0% #311 1,553 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2017 0–2 0.0% #437 1,523 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 2021 1–2 33.3% #163 1,531 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 2022 2–5 28.6% #130 1,602 0 0 — — — — — — —
23 2023 16–14 53.3% #63 1,710 0 0 2025 0–2 0.0% #165 1,550 0 0
24 2024 5–12 29.4% #144 1,609 0 0 2026 3–5 37.5% #114 1,714 0 0
25 2025 5–4 55.6% #116 1,710 0 0 — — — — — — —
26 2026 5–6 45.5% #169 1,670 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Rebeka Masarova Alina Charaeva
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 2016 — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2017 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2021 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2022 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2023 11 9 20 55.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2025 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
24 2024 3 5 8 37.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 2026 0 1 1 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — —
25 2025 2 2 4 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2026 3 4 7 42.9% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 20 24 44 45.5% 13 13 26 50.0% 4 9 13 30.8% — 0 3 3 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 81/83 of Rebeka Masarova's and 8/8 of Alina Charaeva's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Rebeka Masarova Alina Charaeva
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 2016 4/4 4.0 3.5 61.9% 61.0% 47.1% 48.5% 64.9% 55.3% 43.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
17 2017 2/2 4.5 4.5 47.9% 67.1% 39.4% 46.5% 50.0% 52.7% 42.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2021 3/3 6.0 3.3 58.7% 65.1% 40.5% 60.6% 47.2% 54.8% 28.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2022 7/7 5.1 4.7 61.3% 64.4% 49.5% 55.3% 44.0% 58.6% 45.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2023 30/30 4.8 3.6 67.4% 66.9% 45.4% 57.5% 43.9% 60.1% 40.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2024 17/17 3.8 4.2 63.2% 61.1% 41.6% 56.7% 41.3% 53.7% 41.4% 2026 8/8 2.6 5.1 58.3% 59.5% 42.4% 51.7% 42.4% 52.4% 46.3%
25 2025 7/9 6.1 3.7 57.4% 70.5% 43.1% 43.5% 62.9% 59.0% 39.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 2026 11/11 3.8 3.8 60.6% 72.5% 40.6% 54.1% 42.3% 59.8% 37.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 81/83 4.6 3.9 63.1% 66.2% 43.8% 54.9% 46.1% 57.9% 40.3% — 8/10 2.6 5.1 58.3% 59.5% 42.4% 51.7% 42.4% 52.4% 46.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Rebeka Masarova Alina Charaeva
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Schedule
16 2016 1553 107.1 +1.31 -0.45 0.980 50.1% — +41 — 60.0% +0.30 2–0 1–0 -0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2017 1524 98.8 -1.35 -3.26 0.903 47.1% — — — 20.0% -1.40 0–1 1–0 +0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1498 101.2 — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1502 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2021 1532 109.5 +0.36 -2.97 0.626 43.0% -22 — — 28.6% -1.57 1–0 2–1 (67%) -0.09 2023 1508 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2022 1602 105.6 +0.08 -0.56 1.090 51.8% — +75 — 31.3% -0.69 1–1 1–2 (33%) +0.70 2024 1512 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2023 1710 131.5 +2.67 -2.26 1.012 50.3% -29 +25 -133 55.2% +0.10 6–5 (55%) 9–2 (82%) -0.41 2025 1550 108.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.75 — — +0.10
24 2024 1609 118.3 -1.54 -1.72 0.896 47.7% +2 +55 -16 35.7% -1.05 3–5 (38%) 3–1 (75%) -0.81 2026 1715 118.8 -2.66 +0.15 0.971 49.1% — +76 — 40.0% -0.45 2–2 (50%) 0–1 -0.63
25 2025 1711 130.9 +0.55 -0.81 0.965 49.4% -46 +82 — 52.4% 0.00 2–1 (67%) 0–2 -0.89 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2026 1671 122.6 +1.06 -2.75 0.925 48.3% -30 +104 — 44.4% -0.52 3–2 (60%) 1–1 -0.43 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1801 127.4 +0.91 -1.90 0.957 49.2% -24 +61 -94 45.6% -0.40 18–15 (55%) 18–9 (67%) -2.42 — 1733 114.9 -2.66 +0.15 0.971 49.1% — +76 — 33.3% -1.00 2–2 (50%) 0–1 -5.30

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.