H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Rebeka Masarova vs Anett Kontaveit H2H: 1-0
Rebeka Masarova holds a 1–0 lead over Anett Kontaveit in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Rebeka Masarova leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Rebeka Masarova won the 2016 Gstaad fourth round 7-6(2) 4-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SUI
Age 26
Right-Handed
186 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
EST
Age 30
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 15, 2016* | Gstaad | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Rebeka Masarova | 7-6(2) 4-6 6-2 | Anett Kontaveit | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rebeka Masarova | #166 | #62 | 982 | 1,799 | 37 | 46 | 44.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Anett Kontaveit | #81 | #2 | 4,721 | 2,109 | 205 | 138 | 59.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Rebeka Masarova | Anett Kontaveit | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2016 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #311 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #437 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #249 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #159 | 1,466 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #91 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #112 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2021 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #163 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #34 | 1,706 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2022 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #130 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 33–23 | 58.9% | #20 | 1,832 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2023 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #63 | 1,710 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 24–16 | 60.0% | #26 | 1,865 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2024 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #144 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 21–11 | 65.6% | #23 | 1,912 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2025 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #116 | 1,709 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 49–17 | 74.2% | #7 | 2,049 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 2026 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #166 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 29–16 | 64.4% | #17 | 1,882 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #81 | 1,776 | 0 | 6 |