H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC
Renata Zarazua vs Saisai Zheng H2H: 0-1
Saisai Zheng holds a 1–0 lead over Renata Zarazua in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Saisai Zheng leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Saisai Zheng won the 2019 Acapulco third round 3-6 7-5 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
MEX
Age 28
Right-Handed
160 cm / 5'3"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
CHN
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 26, 2019 | Acapulco | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Saisai Zheng | 3-6 7-5 6-4 | Renata Zarazua | Match data |
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Renata Zarazua | #83 | #51 | 1,063 | 1,746 | 30 | 59 | 33.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Saisai Zheng | #692 | #34 | 1,585 | 1,776 | 83 | 130 | 39.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Renata Zarazua | Saisai Zheng | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #299 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #276 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #251 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #138 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #257 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #145 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #263 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #100 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 2020 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #142 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 9–22 | 29.0% | #72 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 2021 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #135 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #85 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 2022 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #368 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #93 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 |
| 2023 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #104 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #38 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 |
| 2024 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #75 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #42 | 1,749 | 0 | 1 |
| 2025 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #79 | 1,715 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 6–4 | 60.0% | #41 | 1,767 | 0 | 1 |
| 2026 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #83 | 1,622 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #79 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #692 | 1,550 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #692 | 1,493 | 0 | 1 |