H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Sabina Sharipova vs Jana Cepelova H2H: 0-1
Jana Cepelova holds a 1–0 lead over Sabina Sharipova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jana Cepelova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jana Cepelova won the 2015 Tashkent third round 6-2 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
UZB
Age 31
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
SVK
Age 33
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 1, 2015* | Tashkent | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Jana Cepelova | 6-2 6-1 | Sabina Sharipova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sabina Sharipova | #987 | #122 | 500 | 1,504 | 5 | 13 | 27.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Jana Cepelova | #894 | #50 | 1,074 | 1,685 | 55 | 91 | 37.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sabina Sharipova | Jana Cepelova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #415 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #474 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2011 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #489 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2012 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #343 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #344 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #201 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #111 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #244 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #76 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2016 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #149 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #56 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2017 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #186 | 1,448 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #147 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2018 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #142 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #100 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #335 | 1,431 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 8–20 | 28.6% | #108 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #188 | 1,631 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #158 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 |