H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Sabine Lisicki vs Anastasia Rodionova H2H: 0-1

Anastasia Rodionova holds a 1–0 lead over Sabine Lisicki in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Anastasia Rodionova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Anastasia Rodionova won the 2009 US Open second round 6-3 3-6 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Sabine Lisicki
Germany Age 36 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Anastasia Rodionova
Australia Age 44 Right-Handed 167 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Anastasia Rodionova #139 6-3 3-6 7-5 Sabine Lisicki #25 Match data Sep 3, 2009* R64 US Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Sabine Lisicki #502 #12 3,251 1,921 211 176 54.5% 0 0 0 1 3 4
Anastasia Rodionova #872 #62 1,095 1,650 86 150 36.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sabine Lisicki Anastasia Rodionova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2006 0–1 0.0% #444 1,489 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2007 0–1 0.0% #198 1,475 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2008 16–18 47.1% #57 1,608 0 0 2000 0–1 0.0% #239 1,491 0 0
19 2009 29–17 63.0% #22 1,794 0 1 2001 0–2 0.0% #195 1,467 0 0
20 2010 4–9 30.8% #175 1,659 0 1 2002 5–3 62.5% #118 1,520 0 0
21 2011 35–13 72.9% #15 1,878 0 3 2003 7–8 46.7% #165 1,545 0 0
22 2012 17–19 47.2% #37 1,720 0 3 2004 0–1 0.0% #212 1,529 0 0
23 2013 34–19 64.2% #15 1,844 0 3 2005 2–3 40.0% #140 1,516 0 0
24 2014 27–21 56.2% #26 1,818 0 4 2006 10–15 40.0% #94 1,530 0 0
25 2015 22–19 53.7% #32 1,795 0 4 2007 11–20 35.5% #78 1,526 0 0
26 2016 15–21 41.7% #93 1,639 0 4 2008 8–20 28.6% #98 1,504 0 0
27 2017 5–5 50.0% #220 1,633 0 4 2009 5–9 35.7% #95 1,523 0 0
28 2018 5–4 55.6% #199 1,547 0 4 2010 17–20 45.9% #64 1,607 0 0
29 2019 0–4 0.0% #562 1,478 0 4 2011 8–21 27.6% #108 1,547 0 0
30 — — — — — — — 2012 6–13 31.6% #139 1,526 0 0
31 — — — — — — — 2013 2–7 22.2% #162 1,492 0 0
32 2022 2–2 50.0% #342 1,574 0 4 2014 2–3 40.0% #185 1,505 0 0
33 2023 0–3 0.0% #311 1,568 0 4 2015 1–2 33.3% #235 1,502 0 0
34 — — — — — — — 2016 0–1 0.0% #797 1,470 0 0
35 — — — — — — — 2017 2–1 66.7% #390 1,482 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Sabine Lisicki Anastasia Rodionova
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 2006 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2007 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2008 14 13 27 51.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2000 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2009 15 11 26 57.7% 10 4 14 71.4% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2001 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 2010 4 9 13 30.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 3 1 4 75.0%
21 2011 19 9 28 67.9% 5 3 8 62.5% 11 1 12 91.7% — — — — 2003 3 4 7 42.9% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
22 2012 9 12 21 42.9% 2 4 6 33.3% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — 2004 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2013 18 11 29 62.1% 8 6 14 57.1% 8 2 10 80.0% — — — — 2005 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2014 19 15 34 55.9% 4 5 9 44.4% 4 1 5 80.0% — — — — 2006 9 10 19 47.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 2015 13 12 25 52.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — 2007 10 14 24 41.7% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
26 2016 9 13 22 40.9% 3 6 9 33.3% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2008 6 13 19 31.6% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
27 2017 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2009 2 6 8 25.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
28 2018 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 7 11 18 38.9% 6 6 12 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
29 2019 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2011 4 14 18 22.2% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 3 6 9 33.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 2 6 8 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
32 2022 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2014 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
33 2023 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2015 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — —
Career — 128 113 241 53.1% 38 43 81 46.9% 45 20 65 69.2% — — — — — 51 94 145 35.2% 25 39 64 39.1% 7 15 22 31.8% 3 2 5 60.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 346/387 of Sabine Lisicki's and 154/219 of Anastasia Rodionova's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Sabine Lisicki Anastasia Rodionova
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 2006 1/1 3.0 8.0 49.4% 65.8% 35.9% 45.5% 33.3% 50.6% 42.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
17 2007 1/1 2.0 4.0 49.0% 48.0% 46.2% 50.0% 0.0% 47.1% 30.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2008 27/34 4.6 7.2 56.7% 68.5% 38.4% 52.4% 54.9% 55.4% 46.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2009 41/46 4.9 6.3 54.0% 70.6% 44.5% 47.2% 52.2% 58.6% 44.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2010 13/13 4.5 5.5 52.1% 66.4% 47.9% 56.4% 41.1% 57.5% 44.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2011 44/48 5.4 4.0 54.1% 74.3% 49.2% 62.2% 50.3% 62.9% 47.5% 2003 1/15 2.0 7.0 60.0% 64.1% 26.9% 66.7% 0.0% 49.2% 32.1%
22 2012 29/36 4.6 5.3 56.4% 65.4% 43.5% 48.7% 49.9% 55.8% 42.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2013 51/53 5.7 3.7 55.8% 71.5% 47.1% 57.6% 46.8% 60.6% 44.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2014 44/48 5.3 6.0 56.2% 66.5% 42.2% 53.2% 52.3% 55.9% 44.9% 2006 5/25 1.6 2.4 68.3% 50.8% 35.0% 38.1% 31.3% 46.0% 38.2%
25 2015 38/41 6.1 5.5 61.7% 68.6% 49.6% 51.9% 45.5% 61.2% 41.8% 2007 22/31 0.9 2.3 63.8% 54.6% 44.9% 38.2% 58.7% 51.1% 37.2%
26 2016 30/36 4.1 5.1 56.7% 65.7% 45.0% 54.8% 50.2% 57.0% 42.3% 2008 24/28 1.5 3.4 60.0% 57.0% 40.4% 47.2% 45.2% 50.9% 40.3%
27 2017 7/10 5.0 5.3 57.0% 65.3% 43.1% 49.3% 44.1% 55.9% 38.7% 2009 13/14 1.1 1.6 65.0% 55.0% 41.5% 36.4% 48.0% 50.3% 42.9%
28 2018 9/9 4.7 6.8 53.8% 66.4% 38.0% 51.6% 47.3% 53.6% 44.3% 2010 30/37 1.8 3.3 62.3% 60.2% 44.7% 48.7% 56.1% 54.8% 42.4%
29 2019 4/4 7.0 5.0 50.7% 68.5% 43.6% 35.5% 31.3% 56.1% 34.9% 2011 27/29 1.1 2.3 63.7% 54.5% 41.4% 45.3% 48.2% 49.8% 40.7%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 16/19 1.5 3.0 63.5% 59.4% 41.7% 50.9% 45.6% 53.1% 38.4%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 8/9 1.1 3.1 62.2% 60.7% 45.2% 52.3% 48.1% 54.5% 38.1%
32 2022 4/4 6.0 6.0 55.5% 72.1% 44.7% 61.8% 20.8% 59.9% 37.8% 2014 3/5 0.7 4.3 60.6% 48.4% 39.1% 49.1% 44.4% 44.7% 36.0%
33 2023 3/3 9.0 7.3 50.8% 69.6% 47.4% 64.9% 17.8% 57.6% 34.6% 2015 1/3 1.0 4.0 56.7% 68.4% 44.8% 33.3% 18.2% 58.2% 32.4%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 1/1 0.0 3.0 56.3% 59.3% 47.6% 50.0% 20.0% 54.2% 32.8%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 3/3 1.0 2.7 65.7% 58.1% 52.6% 40.0% 62.2% 56.2% 52.5%
Career — 346/387 5.2 5.3 56.0% 69.0% 45.2% 53.8% 48.5% 58.5% 44.0% — 154/236 1.3 2.8 62.9% 56.9% 42.6% 45.3% 49.4% 51.7% 40.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Sabine Lisicki Anastasia Rodionova
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 2006 1490 97.8 -4.35 +1.90 0.851 46.2% — — — 33.3% -2.00 0–1 — — 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2007 1475 92.7 -4.39 -4.73 0.575 39.2% — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2008 1609 133.9 +0.46 +1.65 1.031 50.7% +18 -91 — 48.8% +0.23 6–8 (43%) 3–4 (43%) 99.3 -0.68 2000 1491 100.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.10
19 2009 1795 142.8 +2.82 +1.50 1.080 51.5% -77 -94 -115 67.0% +1.00 5–9 (36%) 8–5 (62%) 101.1 -1.35 2001 1468 97.2 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.60 0–1 — — -0.01
20 2010 1660 119.1 +0.56 +0.05 1.039 50.7% -50 — — 39.1% -0.35 0–3 (0%) 0–1 — +1.00 2002 1521 110.8 — — — — +31 — — 68.8% +1.25 1–1 2–0 — +0.66
21 2011 1878 150.7 +6.12 +3.41 1.281 54.9% -103 -151 +55 71.6% +1.55 5–4 (56%) 7–2 (78%) 107.1 -1.88 2003 1546 112.1 -0.41 -1.53 0.632 41.5% +13 -5 +64 44.4% -0.11 4–2 (67%) 2–3 (40%) 103.0 +0.44
22 2012 1720 130.9 +0.96 +0.55 0.960 49.3% -29 -44 +213 50.0% -0.14 9–9 (50%) 4–2 (67%) 99.1 -0.58 2004 1530 99.5 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 — — +0.03
23 2013 1844 146.6 +4.46 +1.57 1.140 52.5% -62 -114 +222 64.1% +1.09 8–7 (53%) 6–4 (60%) 102.7 -1.08 2005 1516 101.2 — — — — +8 — — 45.5% -0.55 0–1 — — +0.62
24 2014 1818 138.6 +0.60 +1.87 1.017 50.4% -31 -117 +227 56.5% +0.41 13–7 (65%) 3–5 (38%) 102.1 -0.86 2006 1531 105.6 -3.96 -2.68 0.708 42.0% +19 — +38 38.9% -1.06 5–3 (63%) 1–0 — +0.88
25 2015 1795 140.5 +2.78 +0.69 1.077 51.3% +8 -130 +203 55.2% +0.35 5–11 (31%) 9–9 (50%) 94.4 -0.18 2007 1526 112.8 -3.50 -4.50 0.761 44.3% +38 -79 — 38.3% -1.28 3–1 (75%) 1–4 (20%) 101.3 -0.27
26 2016 1640 122.1 +0.47 -0.96 0.982 49.4% +15 -29 +307 46.3% -0.07 1–8 (11%) 1–7 (13%) 85.1 +0.16 2008 1505 113.6 -2.71 -1.63 0.821 45.9% +44 -61 — 29.1% -1.78 1–4 (20%) 4–1 (80%) 99.2 -0.65
27 2017 1634 104.3 -1.13 -0.41 0.878 47.6% +5 — +286 50.0% -0.55 1–3 (25%) 5–1 (83%) 101.0 +0.09 2009 1524 107.2 -3.03 -0.73 0.863 46.5% -3 -24 — 41.9% -0.68 2–3 (40%) 2–1 (67%) 101.2 -0.01
28 2018 1547 109.2 -1.76 -0.60 0.954 48.7% +1 — — 47.6% -0.28 3–0 (100%) 1–1 — +0.66 2010 1607 116.6 -0.85 -0.88 0.938 48.8% -41 -81 -33 43.9% -0.63 8–6 (57%) 2–3 (40%) 103.6 -0.61
29 2019 1478 99.2 +1.15 -1.10 0.795 44.9% — +20 — 11.1% -2.22 0–1 — — -0.75 2011 1547 124.2 -3.69 -1.81 0.811 45.4% -34 +33 — 30.6% -1.40 3–5 (38%) 3–6 (33%) 97.8 -0.88
30 2020 1519 101.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1527 116.9 -1.23 -2.69 0.818 46.1% -15 +15 +3 36.4% -0.68 2–4 (33%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.61
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1492 113.2 -0.47 -2.98 0.838 46.1% -9 — — 33.3% -1.17 0–2 1–3 (25%) — -0.02
32 2022 1575 103.5 -0.52 -1.10 0.944 48.2% — — +332 44.4% -0.44 1–0 1–1 — +0.47 2014 1506 99.3 -1.73 -2.26 0.650 40.2% -19 — — 33.3% -1.75 2–0 0–1 — -0.10
33 2023 1569 105.0 -1.38 +0.08 0.816 46.0% — — — 14.3% -1.71 0–1 0–1 — -0.05 2015 1502 99.6 +0.38 -1.15 0.776 44.7% — — — 33.3% -1.83 — — — -0.01
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1470 102.2 -3.27 -2.73 0.715 42.5% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.22
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1483 106.0 +1.78 +1.28 1.200 54.3% — +62 — 66.7% +1.33 — 1–0 — -0.02
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1445 96.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1922 140.4 +2.23 +1.19 1.059 51.1% -33 -94 +169 55.9% +0.44 57–72 (44%) 48–43 (53%) 98.5 -1.28 — 1650 116.6 -2.29 -2.02 0.833 46.1% +6 -26 +5 38.4% -0.97 31–34 (48%) 20–24 (45%) 103.2 -0.19

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.