H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Sabine Lisicki vs Anna-Lena Groenefeld H2H: 0-1
Anna-Lena Groenefeld holds a 1–0 lead over Sabine Lisicki in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Anna-Lena Groenefeld leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Anna-Lena Groenefeld won the 2009 Estoril quarterfinal 6-2 0-0 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 36
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
GER
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 9, 2009* | Estoril | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Anna-Lena Groenefeld | 6-2 0-0 (ret.) | Sabine Lisicki | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sabine Lisicki | #502 | #12 | 3,251 | 1,940 | 206 | 172 | 54.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| Anna-Lena Groenefeld | #1,012 | #14 | 1,365 | 1,856 | 109 | 130 | 45.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Sabine Lisicki | Anna-Lena Groenefeld | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #444 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #118 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #198 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #68 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #57 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 36–26 | 58.1% | #21 | 1,786 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 29–17 | 63.0% | #22 | 1,792 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #19 | 1,656 | 0 | 1 |
| 2010 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #175 | 1,658 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #204 | 1,527 | 0 | 1 |
| 2011 | 35–13 | 72.9% | #15 | 1,872 | 0 | 3 | 2008 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #76 | 1,596 | 0 | 1 |
| 2012 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #37 | 1,707 | 0 | 3 | 2009 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #65 | 1,655 | 0 | 1 |
| 2013 | 34–19 | 64.2% | #15 | 1,824 | 0 | 3 | 2010 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #166 | 1,563 | 0 | 1 |
| 2014 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #26 | 1,798 | 0 | 4 | 2011 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #266 | 1,542 | 0 | 1 |
| 2015 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #32 | 1,791 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #93 | 1,647 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #220 | 1,636 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #199 | 1,549 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #562 | 1,479 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #342 | 1,575 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #311 | 1,569 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |