H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Sabine Lisicki vs Dominika Cibulkova H2H: 2-0
Sabine Lisicki holds a 2–0 lead over Dominika Cibulkova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Sabine Lisicki leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Sabine Lisicki won the 2013 Madrid third round 7-6(4) 7-6(3).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 36
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
SVK
Age 37
Right-Handed
161 cm / 5'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 9, 2013* | Madrid | WTA 1000 | R32 | Clay | Sabine Lisicki | 7-6(4) 7-6(3) | Dominika Cibulkova | Match data |
| Apr 21, 2011* | Stuttgart | WTA 500 | R32 | Clay | Sabine Lisicki | 7-5 7-6(2) | Dominika Cibulkova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sabine Lisicki | #502 | #12 | 3,251 | 1,940 | 206 | 172 | 54.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| Dominika Cibulkova | #315 | #4 | 5,245 | 1,966 | 365 | 261 | 58.3% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sabine Lisicki | Dominika Cibulkova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #444 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #198 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #153 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2008 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #57 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #51 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2009 | 29–17 | 63.0% | #22 | 1,792 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #19 | 1,840 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2010 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #175 | 1,658 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #28 | 1,733 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2011 | 35–13 | 72.9% | #15 | 1,872 | 0 | 3 | 2010 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #31 | 1,753 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2012 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #37 | 1,707 | 0 | 3 | 2011 | 41–21 | 66.1% | #18 | 1,893 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2013 | 34–19 | 64.2% | #15 | 1,824 | 0 | 3 | 2012 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #15 | 1,810 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2014 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #26 | 1,798 | 0 | 4 | 2013 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #23 | 1,738 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2015 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #32 | 1,791 | 0 | 4 | 2014 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #10 | 1,721 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 2016 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #93 | 1,647 | 0 | 4 | 2015 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #38 | 1,757 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 2017 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #220 | 1,636 | 0 | 4 | 2016 | 53–21 | 71.6% | #5 | 1,951 | 0 | 8 |
| 28 | 2018 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #199 | 1,549 | 0 | 4 | 2017 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #26 | 1,778 | 0 | 8 |
| 29 | 2019 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #562 | 1,479 | 0 | 4 | 2018 | 27–18 | 60.0% | #25 | 1,865 | 0 | 8 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #315 | 1,764 | 0 | 8 |
| 32 | 2022 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #342 | 1,575 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2023 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #311 | 1,569 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |