H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Sabine Lisicki vs Marina Erakovic H2H: 1-2
Marina Erakovic holds a 2–1 lead over Sabine Lisicki in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Marina Erakovic leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Marina Erakovic won the 2013 Memphis final 6-1 0-0 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 36
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
NZL
Age 38
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 24, 2013* | Memphis | WTA 250 | F | Hard | Marina Erakovic | 6-1 0-0 (ret.) | Sabine Lisicki | Match data |
| Feb 2, 2013* | Pattaya | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Sabine Lisicki | 5-7 6-3 6-2 | Marina Erakovic | Match data |
| May 16, 2012* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Marina Erakovic | 7-6(4) 4-6 6-3 | Sabine Lisicki | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sabine Lisicki | #502 | #12 | 3,251 | 1,940 | 206 | 172 | 54.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| Marina Erakovic | #827 | #39 | 1,392 | 1,701 | 105 | 131 | 44.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sabine Lisicki | Marina Erakovic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #444 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #198 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #213 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2008 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #57 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2009 | 29–17 | 63.0% | #22 | 1,792 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #153 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2010 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #175 | 1,658 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #66 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2011 | 35–13 | 72.9% | #15 | 1,872 | 0 | 3 | 2009 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #227 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2012 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #37 | 1,707 | 0 | 3 | 2010 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #333 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2013 | 34–19 | 64.2% | #15 | 1,824 | 0 | 3 | 2011 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #61 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2014 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #26 | 1,798 | 0 | 4 | 2012 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #66 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2015 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #32 | 1,791 | 0 | 4 | 2013 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #46 | 1,673 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2016 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #93 | 1,647 | 0 | 4 | 2014 | 12–20 | 37.5% | #76 | 1,609 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2017 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #220 | 1,636 | 0 | 4 | 2015 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #135 | 1,543 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2018 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #199 | 1,549 | 0 | 4 | 2016 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #106 | 1,625 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2019 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #562 | 1,479 | 0 | 4 | 2017 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #197 | 1,551 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | 2022 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #342 | 1,575 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2023 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #311 | 1,569 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |