H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Sabine Lisicki vs Shahar Peer H2H: 3-2

Sabine Lisicki holds a 3–2 lead over Shahar Peer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on hard courts, while Sabine Lisicki leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Sabine Lisicki won the 2012 Australian Open second round 6-1 6-2.

GER Age 36 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
3 2
5 main draw meetings
ISR Age 39 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 20, 2012* Australian Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Sabine Lisicki #15 6-1 6-2 Shahar Peer #34 Match data
Aug 17, 2011* Cincinnati WTA 1000 R64 Hard Shahar Peer #24 6-4 7-6(4) Sabine Lisicki #22 Match data
Oct 24, 2009* Luxembourg WTA 250 SF Hard Sabine Lisicki #28 6-3 4-6 7-6(5) Shahar Peer #38 Match data
Jul 30, 2008* Montreal WTA 1000 R64 Hard Shahar Peer #23 6-3 6-4 Sabine Lisicki #81 Match data
May 7, 2008* Berlin WTA 1000 R64 Clay Sabine Lisicki #102 7-5 6-1 Shahar Peer #18 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Sabine Lisicki #502 #12 3,251 1,940 206 172 54.5% 0 0 0 1 3 4
Shahar Peer #1,185 #11 3,410 1,966 268 204 56.8% 0 0 0 1 4 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sabine Lisicki Shahar Peer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2006 0–1 0.0% #444 1,489 0 0
17 2007 0–1 0.0% #198 1,475 0 0 2004 3–3 50.0% #176 1,509 0 0
18 2008 16–18 47.1% #57 1,606 0 0 2005 22–20 52.4% #45 1,636 0 0
19 2009 29–17 63.0% #22 1,792 0 1 2006 38–20 65.5% #20 1,826 0 3
20 2010 4–9 30.8% #175 1,658 0 1 2007 39–21 65.0% #17 1,830 0 3
21 2011 35–13 72.9% #15 1,872 0 3 2008 24–20 54.5% #38 1,707 0 3
22 2012 15–18 45.5% #37 1,707 0 3 2009 36–21 63.2% #30 1,787 0 5
23 2013 34–19 64.2% #15 1,824 0 3 2010 47–21 69.1% #13 1,885 0 5
24 2014 27–21 56.2% #26 1,798 0 4 2011 23–21 52.3% #37 1,706 0 5
25 2015 22–19 53.7% #32 1,791 0 4 2012 15–22 40.5% #74 1,584 0 5
26 2016 14–19 42.4% #93 1,647 0 4 2013 10–14 41.7% #77 1,558 0 5
27 2017 3–4 42.9% #220 1,636 0 4 2014 10–18 35.7% #117 1,539 0 5
28 2018 5–4 55.6% #199 1,549 0 4 2015 1–3 25.0% #177 1,526 0 5
29 2019 0–4 0.0% #562 1,479 0 4
32 2022 2–2 50.0% #342 1,575 0 4
33 2023 0–3 0.0% #311 1,569 0 4