H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Sabine Lisicki vs Timea Bacsinszky H2H: 0-3
Timea Bacsinszky holds a 3–0 lead over Sabine Lisicki in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Timea Bacsinszky leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Timea Bacsinszky won the 2015 Wimbledon third round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 36
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0
–
3
3 main draw meetings
SUI
Age 37
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 5, 2015* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R32 | Grass | Timea Bacsinszky | 6-3 6-2 | Sabine Lisicki | Match data |
| May 14, 2015* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R32 | Clay | Timea Bacsinszky | 6-4 6-3 | Sabine Lisicki | Match data |
| Oct 25, 2009* | Luxembourg | WTA 250 | F | Hard | Timea Bacsinszky | 6-2 7-5 | Sabine Lisicki | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sabine Lisicki | #502 | #12 | 3,251 | 1,940 | 206 | 172 | 54.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| Timea Bacsinszky | #941 | #9 | 3,157 | 1,933 | 161 | 137 | 54.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sabine Lisicki | Timea Bacsinszky | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #252 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #444 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #198 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #124 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2008 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #57 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #122 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2009 | 29–17 | 63.0% | #22 | 1,792 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #54 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2010 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #175 | 1,658 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 17–10 | 63.0% | #53 | 1,739 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2011 | 35–13 | 72.9% | #15 | 1,872 | 0 | 3 | 2010 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #50 | 1,693 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2012 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #37 | 1,707 | 0 | 3 | 2011 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #247 | 1,662 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2013 | 34–19 | 64.2% | #15 | 1,824 | 0 | 3 | 2012 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #179 | 1,602 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2014 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #26 | 1,798 | 0 | 4 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #237 | 1,596 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2015 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #32 | 1,791 | 0 | 4 | 2014 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #48 | 1,678 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2016 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #93 | 1,647 | 0 | 4 | 2015 | 37–14 | 72.5% | #12 | 1,842 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2017 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #220 | 1,636 | 0 | 4 | 2016 | 32–17 | 65.3% | #15 | 1,777 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 2018 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #199 | 1,549 | 0 | 4 | 2017 | 15–9 | 62.5% | #39 | 1,816 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 2019 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #562 | 1,479 | 0 | 4 | 2018 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #191 | 1,725 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #139 | 1,630 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | 2022 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #342 | 1,575 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2023 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #311 | 1,569 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |