H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:30 UTC
Saisai Zheng vs Christina Mchale H2H: 0-3
Christina Mchale holds a 3–0 lead over Saisai Zheng in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Christina Mchale leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Christina Mchale won the 2018 Nurnberg third round 6-2 7-6(5).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHN
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
3
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 34
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 24, 2018* | Nurnberg | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Christina Mchale | 6-2 7-6(5) | Saisai Zheng | Match data |
| Aug 17, 2016* | Cincinnati | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Christina Mchale | 6-2 6-2 | Saisai Zheng | Match data |
| Sep 19, 2015* | Tokyo | WTA 500 | QF | Hard | Christina Mchale | 2-6 6-3 6-3 | Saisai Zheng | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Saisai Zheng | #692 | #34 | 1,585 | 1,776 | 83 | 130 | 39.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Christina Mchale | #319 | #24 | 1,935 | 1,803 | 166 | 207 | 44.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Saisai Zheng | Christina Mchale | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2011 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #276 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #231 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #138 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #109 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #145 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #43 | 1,716 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #100 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #33 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 9–22 | 29.0% | #72 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #66 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #85 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #52 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #93 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #63 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #38 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #45 | 1,698 | 0 | 1 |
| 2019 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #42 | 1,749 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 19–26 | 42.2% | #64 | 1,690 | 0 | 1 |
| 2020 | 6–4 | 60.0% | #41 | 1,767 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #151 | 1,568 | 0 | 1 |
| 2021 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #79 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #88 | 1,652 | 0 | 1 |
| 2024 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #692 | 1,550 | 0 | 1 | 2020 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #81 | 1,675 | 0 | 1 |
| 2025 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #692 | 1,493 | 0 | 1 | 2021 | 2–16 | 11.1% | #159 | 1,524 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #319 | 1,452 | 0 | 1 |