H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:30 UTC
Saisai Zheng vs Daniela Hantuchova H2H: 0-2
Daniela Hantuchova holds a 2–0 lead over Saisai Zheng in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Daniela Hantuchova leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Daniela Hantuchova won the 2015 Pattaya fourth round 7-6(5) 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHN
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
SVK
Age 43
Right-Handed
181 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 13, 2015* | Pattaya | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Daniela Hantuchova | 7-6(5) 6-2 | Saisai Zheng | Match data |
| Jan 21, 2015* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Daniela Hantuchova | 6-4 6-4 | Saisai Zheng | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Saisai Zheng | #692 | #34 | 1,585 | 1,776 | 83 | 130 | 39.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Daniela Hantuchova | #317 | #5 | 2,897 | 1,968 | 457 | 361 | 55.9% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Saisai Zheng | Daniela Hantuchova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2011 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #276 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #197 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #138 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #108 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #145 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #38 | 1,710 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #100 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 48–24 | 66.7% | #8 | 1,919 | 0 | 1 |
| 2015 | 9–22 | 29.0% | #72 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #19 | 1,753 | 0 | 1 |
| 2016 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #85 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #31 | 1,714 | 0 | 1 |
| 2017 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #93 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 38–25 | 60.3% | #19 | 1,877 | 0 | 1 |
| 2018 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #38 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 35–25 | 58.3% | #17 | 1,860 | 0 | 1 |
| 2019 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #42 | 1,749 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 52–26 | 66.7% | #9 | 1,930 | 0 | 3 |
| 2020 | 6–4 | 60.0% | #41 | 1,767 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #21 | 1,756 | 0 | 3 |
| 2021 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #79 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 37–24 | 60.7% | #24 | 1,807 | 0 | 3 |
| 2024 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #692 | 1,550 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 32–24 | 57.1% | #30 | 1,780 | 0 | 3 |
| 2025 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #692 | 1,493 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 41–25 | 62.1% | #24 | 1,790 | 0 | 4 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #32 | 1,686 | 0 | 5 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #33 | 1,683 | 0 | 6 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 16–24 | 40.0% | #62 | 1,577 | 0 | 6 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #83 | 1,574 | 0 | 7 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #228 | 1,514 | 0 | 7 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #317 | 1,524 | 0 | 7 |