H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:30 UTC
Saisai Zheng vs Danka Kovinic H2H: 0-1
Danka Kovinic holds a 1–0 lead over Saisai Zheng in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Danka Kovinic leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Danka Kovinic won the 2017 Australian Open first round 6-0 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHN
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
MNE
Age 31
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 18, 2017* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Danka Kovinic | 6-0 6-4 | Saisai Zheng | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Saisai Zheng | #692 | #34 | 1,585 | 1,776 | 83 | 130 | 39.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Danka Kovinic | #1,327 | #46 | 1,312 | 1,755 | 85 | 121 | 41.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Saisai Zheng | Danka Kovinic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2011 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #276 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #168 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #138 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #109 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #145 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #57 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #100 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #71 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 9–22 | 29.0% | #72 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 3–16 | 15.8% | #121 | 1,454 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #85 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #154 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #93 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #85 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #38 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #77 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #42 | 1,749 | 0 | 1 | 2021 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #96 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |
| 2020 | 6–4 | 60.0% | #41 | 1,767 | 0 | 1 | 2022 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #60 | 1,687 | 0 | 0 |
| 2021 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #79 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 | 2023 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #150 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 |
| 2024 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #692 | 1,550 | 0 | 1 | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1327 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 2025 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #692 | 1,493 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |