H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:30 UTC
Saisai Zheng vs Dominika Cibulkova H2H: 0-1
Dominika Cibulkova holds a 1–0 lead over Saisai Zheng in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Dominika Cibulkova leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Dominika Cibulkova won the 2016 Roland Garros first round 6-3 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHN
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
SVK
Age 37
Right-Handed
161 cm / 5'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 24, 2016* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Dominika Cibulkova | 6-3 6-1 | Saisai Zheng | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Saisai Zheng | #692 | #34 | 1,585 | 1,776 | 83 | 130 | 39.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Dominika Cibulkova | #315 | #4 | 5,245 | 1,966 | 365 | 261 | 58.3% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Saisai Zheng | Dominika Cibulkova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2011 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #276 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #153 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #138 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #51 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #145 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #19 | 1,840 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #100 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #28 | 1,733 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 9–22 | 29.0% | #72 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #31 | 1,753 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #85 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 41–21 | 66.1% | #18 | 1,893 | 0 | 1 |
| 2017 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #93 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #15 | 1,810 | 0 | 2 |
| 2018 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #38 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #23 | 1,738 | 0 | 3 |
| 2019 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #42 | 1,749 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #10 | 1,721 | 0 | 4 |
| 2020 | 6–4 | 60.0% | #41 | 1,767 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #38 | 1,757 | 0 | 4 |
| 2021 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #79 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 53–21 | 71.6% | #5 | 1,951 | 0 | 8 |
| 2024 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #692 | 1,550 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #26 | 1,778 | 0 | 8 |
| 2025 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #692 | 1,493 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 27–18 | 60.0% | #25 | 1,865 | 0 | 8 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #315 | 1,764 | 0 | 8 |