Saisai Zheng
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alison Riske-Amritraj | 3 | 3 | 6 | Sep 13, 2019 | H2H |
| Qiang Wang | 1 | 4 | 5 | May 28, 2019 | H2H |
| Simona Halep | 0 | 3 | 3 | May 3, 2021 | H2H |
| Stefanie Voegele | 1 | 2 | 3 | Apr 9, 2021 | H2H |
| Lin Zhu | 3 | 0 | 3 | Mar 19, 2021 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC
Ekaterina Makarova holds a 1–0 lead over Saisai Zheng in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Ekaterina Makarova leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Ekaterina Makarova won the 2018 Roland Garros first round 6-4 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ekaterina Makarova | 6-4 6-1 | Saisai Zheng | Match data | May 29, 2018* | R128 | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | Clay |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Saisai Zheng | #692 | #34 | 1,585 | 1,776 | 87 | 133 | 39.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Ekaterina Makarova | #1,000 | #8 | 3,620 | 1,942 | 252 | 225 | 52.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Saisai Zheng | Ekaterina Makarova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2011 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #276 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2012 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #138 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2013 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #145 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #110 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2014 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #100 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #46 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2015 | 9–22 | 29.0% | #72 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #60 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2016 | 13–24 | 35.1% | #85 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #49 | 1,663 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2017 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #93 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #53 | 1,606 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2018 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #38 | 1,678 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #20 | 1,757 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2019 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #42 | 1,750 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #24 | 1,836 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2020 | 6–4 | 60.0% | #41 | 1,768 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 39–21 | 65.0% | #11 | 1,840 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2021 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #79 | 1,686 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 26–16 | 61.9% | #23 | 1,794 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #30 | 1,776 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #33 | 1,840 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2024 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #692 | 1,548 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #57 | 1,756 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 2025 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #997 | 1,707 | 0 | 3 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Saisai Zheng | Ekaterina Makarova | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 17 | 2011 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2012 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2013 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2014 | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 9 | 13 | 22 | 40.9% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2015 | 8 | 17 | 25 | 32.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 7 | 14 | 21 | 33.3% | 9 | 4 | 13 | 69.2% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 22 | 2016 | 10 | 17 | 27 | 37.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 6 | 14 | 20 | 30.0% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 7 | 2 | 9 | 77.8% | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2017 | 4 | 7 | 11 | 36.4% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 9 | 15 | 24 | 37.5% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 24 | 2018 | 12 | 7 | 19 | 63.2% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 17 | 12 | 29 | 58.6% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2019 | 18 | 16 | 34 | 52.9% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 17 | 11 | 28 | 60.7% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2020 | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 30 | 15 | 45 | 66.7% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2021 | 7 | 13 | 20 | 35.0% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 18 | 9 | 27 | 66.7% | 7 | 5 | 12 | 58.3% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 17 | 14 | 31 | 54.8% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 21 | 14 | 35 | 60.0% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2024 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 12 | 13 | 25 | 48.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2025 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 75 | 100 | 175 | 42.9% | 8 | 20 | 28 | 28.6% | 4 | 13 | 17 | 23.5% | — | — | — | — | — | 165 | 149 | 314 | 52.5% | 45 | 46 | 91 | 49.5% | 42 | 28 | 70 | 60.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 195/218 of Saisai Zheng's and 442/477 of Ekaterina Makarova's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Saisai Zheng | Ekaterina Makarova | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 17 | 2011 | 2/2 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 57.0% | 46.2% | 38.1% | 48.6% | 17.7% | 43.0% | 38.5% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2012 | 5/5 | 0.8 | 1.2 | 59.6% | 59.8% | 41.1% | 51.6% | 46.4% | 52.1% | 43.1% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2013 | 4/4 | 1.8 | 3.8 | 63.2% | 56.7% | 39.1% | 50.4% | 42.0% | 50.4% | 45.6% | 2007 | 4/4 | 2.3 | 2.5 | 66.4% | 54.5% | 37.8% | 48.4% | 66.9% | 48.3% | 39.8% |
| 20 | 2014 | 8/12 | 1.6 | 1.4 | 66.9% | 56.0% | 51.5% | 45.6% | 52.8% | 54.4% | 45.8% | 2008 | 30/37 | 2.6 | 2.5 | 60.2% | 62.5% | 44.2% | 40.5% | 45.0% | 55.1% | 43.0% |
| 21 | 2015 | 20/31 | 0.9 | 2.2 | 66.6% | 52.7% | 45.0% | 41.5% | 52.4% | 50.4% | 40.2% | 2009 | 39/41 | 2.2 | 4.0 | 58.6% | 64.0% | 40.9% | 48.2% | 50.2% | 54.2% | 43.9% |
| 22 | 2016 | 34/37 | 0.9 | 2.1 | 63.7% | 56.5% | 46.6% | 51.9% | 45.9% | 52.5% | 44.2% | 2010 | 31/34 | 2.5 | 2.1 | 59.6% | 59.5% | 47.6% | 57.5% | 52.7% | 54.8% | 41.5% |
| 23 | 2017 | 15/15 | 1.2 | 2.2 | 65.3% | 54.2% | 43.1% | 51.6% | 58.7% | 49.8% | 38.9% | 2011 | 36/38 | 2.5 | 2.4 | 60.5% | 64.0% | 43.2% | 47.4% | 47.1% | 55.6% | 39.4% |
| 24 | 2018 | 21/25 | 0.9 | 2.0 | 66.8% | 58.5% | 45.1% | 54.0% | 49.2% | 54.0% | 45.2% | 2012 | 45/45 | 2.1 | 2.0 | 62.9% | 64.9% | 50.6% | 55.1% | 49.3% | 59.5% | 43.6% |
| 25 | 2019 | 44/44 | 1.4 | 2.7 | 64.7% | 59.2% | 44.3% | 49.7% | 45.7% | 53.7% | 43.6% | 2013 | 41/42 | 2.9 | 2.1 | 64.4% | 66.3% | 47.4% | 57.6% | 50.6% | 59.3% | 45.1% |
| 26 | 2020 | 10/10 | 1.3 | 2.0 | 70.3% | 62.9% | 43.1% | 43.5% | 45.9% | 57.5% | 46.4% | 2014 | 56/60 | 2.6 | 2.1 | 64.0% | 65.1% | 47.7% | 59.9% | 44.7% | 58.9% | 45.0% |
| 27 | 2021 | 26/27 | 0.9 | 1.8 | 67.3% | 58.4% | 47.9% | 53.1% | 43.0% | 54.9% | 42.5% | 2015 | 36/42 | 2.1 | 1.8 | 66.0% | 65.8% | 54.1% | 55.9% | 53.9% | 61.6% | 43.2% |
| 28 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 40/48 | 2.5 | 2.8 | 65.6% | 65.1% | 47.3% | 58.4% | 53.6% | 59.0% | 42.4% |
| 29 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 47/48 | 2.9 | 2.9 | 65.5% | 64.2% | 45.5% | 52.2% | 45.3% | 57.7% | 43.3% |
| 30 | 2024 | 6/6 | 1.0 | 3.3 | 62.2% | 51.9% | 44.6% | 40.1% | 45.4% | 49.1% | 39.6% | 2018 | 34/35 | 2.4 | 4.1 | 64.4% | 63.8% | 43.6% | 56.6% | 44.0% | 56.6% | 41.5% |
| 31 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 3/3 | 3.3 | 3.0 | 67.3% | 61.0% | 43.4% | 52.0% | 36.3% | 55.6% | 38.7% |
| Career | — | 195/220 | 1.1 | 2.2 | 65.4% | 57.2% | 45.2% | 49.6% | 47.4% | 52.9% | 43.1% | — | 442/477 | 2.5 | 2.6 | 63.2% | 64.2% | 46.6% | 54.0% | 48.7% | 57.6% | 43.0% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Saisai Zheng | Ekaterina Makarova | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 17 | 2011 | 1474 | 95.9 | -1.89 | -2.23 | 0.676 | 41.1% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.25 | — | — | — | +0.25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2012 | 1483 | 99.4 | -0.72 | -1.45 | 0.900 | 48.2% | +11 | — | — | 33.3% | -1.55 | 0–1 | 1–0 | — | +0.37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2013 | 1468 | 100.9 | -1.08 | +0.55 | 0.920 | 48.0% | +5 | — | — | 30.0% | -1.00 | 1–1 | 1–2 (33%) | — | +0.17 | 2007 | 1536 | 118.3 | +1.82 | -0.84 | 0.769 | 44.4% | +21 | — | — | 40.0% | -1.10 | 2–0 | — | — | -0.12 |
| 20 | 2014 | 1553 | 119.6 | -1.26 | +0.86 | 1.006 | 49.7% | +9 | — | — | 53.3% | -0.23 | 2–4 (33%) | 1–1 | — | -0.37 | 2008 | 1626 | 124.1 | -0.08 | -0.65 | 0.958 | 48.7% | -33 | -52 | +24 | 46.5% | -0.34 | 6–6 (50%) | 4–5 (44%) | 102.4 | -0.55 |
| 21 | 2015 | 1496 | 110.7 | -5.38 | -1.24 | 0.811 | 45.6% | +9 | +30 | +74 | 30.9% | -1.50 | 5–3 (63%) | 2–1 (67%) | 105.2 | -0.08 | 2009 | 1634 | 131.6 | -1.02 | +0.38 | 0.960 | 49.1% | -45 | +48 | +32 | 47.4% | -0.49 | 7–8 (47%) | 7–0 (100%) | 107.5 | -0.92 |
| 22 | 2016 | 1542 | 123.0 | -2.10 | +1.09 | 0.930 | 48.2% | +24 | -74 | +9 | 40.0% | -0.83 | 0–8 (0%) | 2–2 (50%) | 91.8 | +0.81 | 2010 | 1663 | 122.5 | -0.26 | -1.13 | 0.918 | 48.3% | -104 | -64 | +173 | 45.5% | -0.53 | 2–7 (22%) | 5–2 (71%) | 98.1 | -2.59 |
| 23 | 2017 | 1619 | 110.1 | -3.22 | -1.56 | 0.775 | 44.5% | -8 | -100 | — | 34.2% | -1.42 | 5–3 (63%) | 3–1 (75%) | 104.9 | -0.08 | 2011 | 1606 | 131.9 | +0.66 | -2.66 | 0.887 | 47.4% | -47 | +70 | +141 | 40.9% | -0.75 | 6–6 (50%) | 3–6 (33%) | 101.5 | -1.38 |
| 24 | 2018 | 1679 | 118.9 | -1.21 | +1.53 | 0.983 | 49.6% | +22 | -169 | -79 | 54.5% | +0.13 | 3–4 (43%) | 0–1 | — | +1.42 | 2012 | 1758 | 146.6 | +3.45 | +1.31 | 1.076 | 51.4% | -30 | -80 | +28 | 57.1% | +0.51 | 4–6 (40%) | 4–6 (40%) | 96.8 | -2.49 |
| 25 | 2019 | 1750 | 134.4 | -2.18 | +0.80 | 0.942 | 48.7% | -10 | -123 | -200 | 48.0% | -0.28 | 8–6 (57%) | 11–3 (79%) | 107.3 | +0.31 | 2013 | 1836 | 145.0 | +3.78 | +1.69 | 1.108 | 52.2% | -22 | -149 | -40 | 59.3% | +0.60 | 5–8 (38%) | 3–6 (33%) | 94.8 | -1.08 |
| 26 | 2020 | 1768 | 132.2 | +0.85 | +2.96 | 1.090 | 51.7% | -8 | — | — | 58.3% | +0.58 | 2–2 (50%) | 1–1 | — | +0.03 | 2014 | 1841 | 150.2 | +3.13 | +1.93 | 1.095 | 51.8% | +1 | -157 | +25 | 60.2% | +0.56 | 11–2 (85%) | 5–6 (45%) | 106.8 | -1.18 |
| 27 | 2021 | 1686 | 121.1 | -1.18 | -0.16 | 0.941 | 48.6% | -18 | -68 | — | 38.7% | -0.89 | 4–4 (50%) | 1–1 | — | -0.36 | 2015 | 1795 | 142.0 | +3.14 | +1.65 | 1.125 | 52.5% | +49 | -71 | +5 | 64.8% | +0.89 | 4–7 (36%) | 5–1 (83%) | 98.0 | +1.69 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 1776 | 140.5 | +2.86 | -0.13 | 1.035 | 50.8% | +17 | -78 | +71 | 55.0% | +0.41 | 8–9 (47%) | 3–2 (60%) | 96.7 | +0.36 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 1841 | 148.6 | +1.78 | +0.54 | 1.022 | 50.2% | +18 | -103 | -20 | 52.7% | +0.19 | 10–6 (63%) | 6–6 (50%) | 104.6 | -2.16 |
| 30 | 2024 | 1548 | 93.3 | -2.71 | -2.47 | 0.779 | 44.6% | -4 | — | — | 26.7% | -1.73 | 1–2 (33%) | 0–1 | — | +0.51 | 2018 | 1757 | 140.7 | +0.52 | -0.09 | 0.957 | 49.2% | +11 | -59 | +62 | 45.8% | -0.40 | 7–6 (54%) | 4–2 (67%) | 101.3 | -2.54 |
| 31 | 2025 | 1492 | 101.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.25 | — | 0–2 | — | -0.05 | 2019 | 1707 | 109.2 | -2.16 | -1.63 | 0.871 | 47.4% | +6 | — | — | 25.0% | -1.00 | 0–2 | 0–1 | — | 0.00 |
| Career | — | 1777 | 123.8 | -2.10 | +0.33 | 0.915 | 48.0% | +3 | -88 | -35 | 41.7% | -0.74 | 31–38 (45%) | 23–16 (59%) | 104.4 | +1.33 | — | 1942 | 146.2 | +1.78 | +0.38 | 1.014 | 50.2% | -11 | -55 | +51 | 52.5% | +0.08 | 72–73 (50%) | 49–43 (53%) | 104.0 | -2.73 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alison Riske-Amritraj | 3 | 3 | 6 | Sep 13, 2019 | H2H |
| Qiang Wang | 1 | 4 | 5 | May 28, 2019 | H2H |
| Simona Halep | 0 | 3 | 3 | May 3, 2021 | H2H |
| Stefanie Voegele | 1 | 2 | 3 | Apr 9, 2021 | H2H |
| Lin Zhu | 3 | 0 | 3 | Mar 19, 2021 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Angelique Kerber | 6 | 8 | 14 | Mar 10, 2018 | H2H |
| Petra Kvitova | 4 | 6 | 10 | Aug 26, 2016 | H2H |
| Caroline Wozniacki | 2 | 7 | 9 | Jul 5, 2018 | H2H |
| Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova | 4 | 5 | 9 | Feb 1, 2018 | H2H |
| Agnieszka Radwanska | 3 | 6 | 9 | Apr 27, 2017 | H2H |