H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 04:30 UTC
Saisai Zheng vs Eugenie Bouchard H2H: 1-0
Saisai Zheng holds a 1–0 lead over Eugenie Bouchard in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Saisai Zheng leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Saisai Zheng won the 2016 Doha fourth round 7-6(1) 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHN
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
CAN
Age 32
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 25, 2016* | Doha | WTA 1000 | R16 | Hard | Saisai Zheng | 7-6(1) 6-1 | Eugenie Bouchard | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Saisai Zheng | #692 | #34 | 1,585 | 1,776 | 83 | 130 | 39.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Eugenie Bouchard | #1,002 | #5 | 4,793 | 1,926 | 156 | 144 | 52.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Saisai Zheng | Eugenie Bouchard | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2011 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #276 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #305 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #138 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #147 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #145 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #32 | 1,752 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #100 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 39–23 | 62.9% | #7 | 1,834 | 0 | 1 |
| 2015 | 9–22 | 29.0% | #72 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #49 | 1,678 | 0 | 1 |
| 2016 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #85 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 28–22 | 56.0% | #46 | 1,699 | 0 | 1 |
| 2017 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #93 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #81 | 1,604 | 0 | 1 |
| 2018 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #38 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #87 | 1,670 | 0 | 1 |
| 2019 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #42 | 1,749 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #215 | 1,616 | 0 | 1 |
| 2020 | 6–4 | 60.0% | #41 | 1,767 | 0 | 1 | 2020 | 10–4 | 71.4% | #141 | 1,712 | 0 | 1 |
| 2021 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #79 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 | 2021 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #253 | 1,703 | 0 | 1 |
| 2024 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #692 | 1,550 | 0 | 1 | 2022 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #326 | 1,630 | 0 | 1 |
| 2025 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #692 | 1,493 | 0 | 1 | 2023 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #287 | 1,635 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #1002 | 1,609 | 0 | 1 |