H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC
Saisai Zheng vs Fiona Ferro H2H: 1-1
Saisai Zheng and Fiona Ferro are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Saisai Zheng won the 2021 Miami first round 2-6 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHN
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 29
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 25, 2021* | Miami | WTA 1000 | R128 | Hard | Saisai Zheng | 2-6 6-4 6-3 | Fiona Ferro | Match data |
| Sep 21, 2018* | Guangzhou | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Fiona Ferro | 0-6 6-3 6-2 | Saisai Zheng | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Saisai Zheng | #692 | #34 | 1,585 | 1,776 | 83 | 130 | 39.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Fiona Ferro | #189 | #39 | 1,649 | 1,799 | 55 | 72 | 43.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Saisai Zheng | Fiona Ferro | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2011 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #276 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #345 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #138 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #254 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #145 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #326 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #100 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #102 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 9–22 | 29.0% | #72 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #63 | 1,622 | 0 | 1 |
| 2016 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #85 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 11–4 | 73.3% | #42 | 1,770 | 0 | 2 |
| 2017 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #93 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #103 | 1,667 | 0 | 2 |
| 2018 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #38 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #411 | 1,568 | 0 | 2 |
| 2019 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #42 | 1,749 | 0 | 1 | 2023 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #161 | 1,611 | 0 | 2 |
| 2020 | 6–4 | 60.0% | #41 | 1,767 | 0 | 1 | 2024 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #284 | 1,550 | 0 | 2 |
| 2021 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #79 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 | 2025 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #366 | 1,570 | 0 | 2 |
| 2024 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #692 | 1,550 | 0 | 1 | 2026 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #189 | 1,635 | 0 | 2 |
| 2025 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #692 | 1,493 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |