H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 10:30 UTC
Saisai Zheng vs Johanna Larsson H2H: 0-1
Johanna Larsson holds a 1–0 lead over Saisai Zheng in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Johanna Larsson leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Johanna Larsson won the 2015 Hobart third round 3-6 1-0 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHN
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
SWE
Age 37
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 15, 2015* | Hobart | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Johanna Larsson | 3-6 1-0 (ret.) | Saisai Zheng | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Saisai Zheng | #692 | #34 | 1,585 | 1,776 | 83 | 130 | 39.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Johanna Larsson | #236 | #45 | 1,230 | 1,745 | 153 | 177 | 46.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Saisai Zheng | Johanna Larsson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2011 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #276 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #389 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #138 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #177 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #145 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #172 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #100 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #69 | 1,571 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 9–22 | 29.0% | #72 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #59 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #85 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #73 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #93 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #84 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #38 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #70 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #42 | 1,749 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 25–19 | 56.8% | #56 | 1,670 | 0 | 1 |
| 2020 | 6–4 | 60.0% | #41 | 1,767 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 29–24 | 54.7% | #50 | 1,716 | 0 | 1 |
| 2021 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #79 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 15–21 | 41.7% | #80 | 1,626 | 0 | 1 |
| 2024 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #692 | 1,550 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #75 | 1,600 | 0 | 2 |
| 2025 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #692 | 1,493 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 3–13 | 18.8% | #217 | 1,557 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #236 | 1,543 | 0 | 2 |