H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 22:30 UTC
Saisai Zheng vs Julia Goerges H2H: 0-1
Julia Goerges holds a 1–0 lead over Saisai Zheng in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Julia Goerges leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Julia Goerges won the 2017 US Open second round 6-2 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHN
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
GER
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 31, 2017* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Julia Goerges | 6-2 6-1 | Saisai Zheng | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Saisai Zheng | #692 | #34 | 1,585 | 1,776 | 83 | 130 | 39.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Julia Goerges | #45 | #9 | 3,980 | 1,940 | 304 | 249 | 55.0% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Saisai Zheng | Julia Goerges | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2011 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #276 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #126 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #138 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #108 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #145 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #77 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #100 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 29–22 | 56.9% | #40 | 1,760 | 0 | 1 |
| 2015 | 9–22 | 29.0% | #72 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 36–24 | 60.0% | #21 | 1,772 | 0 | 2 |
| 2016 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #85 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #18 | 1,751 | 0 | 2 |
| 2017 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #93 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 14–27 | 34.1% | #72 | 1,535 | 0 | 2 |
| 2018 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #38 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #74 | 1,596 | 0 | 2 |
| 2019 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #42 | 1,749 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #50 | 1,612 | 0 | 2 |
| 2020 | 6–4 | 60.0% | #41 | 1,767 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #53 | 1,671 | 0 | 2 |
| 2021 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #79 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 42–22 | 65.6% | #14 | 1,880 | 0 | 4 |
| 2024 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #692 | 1,550 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 44–22 | 66.7% | #14 | 1,861 | 0 | 6 |
| 2025 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #692 | 1,493 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #28 | 1,799 | 0 | 7 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #45 | 1,761 | 0 | 7 |