H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:30 UTC
Saisai Zheng vs Laura Robson H2H: 0-1
Laura Robson holds a 1–0 lead over Saisai Zheng in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Laura Robson leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Laura Robson won the 2013 Guangzhou fourth round 6-3 7-6(4).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHN
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
GBR
Age 32
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 20, 2013* | Guangzhou | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Laura Robson | 6-3 7-6(4) | Saisai Zheng | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Saisai Zheng | #692 | #34 | 1,585 | 1,776 | 83 | 130 | 39.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Laura Robson | #764 | #27 | 1,685 | 1,708 | 38 | 62 | 38.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Saisai Zheng | Laura Robson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2011 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #276 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #517 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #138 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #403 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #145 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #217 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #100 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #133 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 9–22 | 29.0% | #72 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #53 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #85 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #44 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #93 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #916 | 1,629 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #38 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #557 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #42 | 1,749 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #222 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 2020 | 6–4 | 60.0% | #41 | 1,767 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #229 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 2021 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #79 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #692 | 1,550 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #692 | 1,493 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |