H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Saisai Zheng vs Mandy Minella H2H: 1-0

Saisai Zheng holds a 1–0 lead over Mandy Minella in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Saisai Zheng leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Saisai Zheng won the 2019 Hua Hin first round 6-7(8) 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Saisai Zheng
China Age 32 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Mandy Minella
Luxembourg Age 40 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Saisai Zheng #42 6-7(8) 6-4 6-4 Mandy Minella #101 Match data Jan 31, 2019* R32 Hua Hin International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Saisai Zheng #692 #34 1,585 1,776 87 133 39.5% 0 0 0 1 0 1
Mandy Minella #787 #66 955 1,646 58 100 36.7% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Saisai Zheng Mandy Minella
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2011 0–2 0.0% #276 1,473 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2012 2–3 40.0% #138 1,483 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2013 1–3 25.0% #145 1,467 0 0 2005 0–2 0.0% #249 1,477 0 0
20 2014 6–6 50.0% #100 1,552 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 2015 9–22 29.0% #72 1,495 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 2016 13–24 35.1% #85 1,542 0 0 2008 0–1 0.0% #330 1,474 0 0
23 2017 5–10 33.3% #93 1,618 0 0 2009 0–1 0.0% #243 1,465 0 0
24 2018 13–12 52.0% #38 1,678 0 0 2010 2–2 50.0% #136 1,504 0 0
25 2019 21–23 47.7% #42 1,750 0 1 2011 2–6 25.0% #110 1,472 0 0
26 2020 6–4 60.0% #41 1,768 0 1 2012 11–14 44.0% #77 1,515 0 0
27 2021 10–17 37.0% #79 1,686 0 1 2013 12–18 40.0% #106 1,530 0 0
28 — — — — — — — 2014 1–5 16.7% #181 1,496 0 0
29 — — — — — — — 2015 1–5 16.7% #168 1,449 0 0
30 2024 1–5 16.7% #692 1,548 0 1 2016 8–7 53.3% #105 1,557 0 1
31 2025 0–2 0.0% — 1,491 0 1 2017 9–13 40.9% #143 1,576 0 1
32 — — — — — — — 2018 7–7 50.0% #103 1,615 0 1
33 — — — — — — — 2019 3–11 21.4% #141 1,548 0 1
34 — — — — — — — 2020 0–1 0.0% #170 1,535 0 1
35 — — — — — — — 2021 2–7 22.2% #262 1,537 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Saisai Zheng Mandy Minella
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 2011 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2012 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2013 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — 2005 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 2014 6 5 11 54.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2015 8 17 25 32.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2016 10 17 27 37.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 2008 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
23 2017 4 7 11 36.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2009 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
24 2018 12 7 19 63.2% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2010 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — —
25 2019 18 16 34 52.9% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 3 3 0.0% 2011 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
26 2020 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — — — — — 2012 7 6 13 53.8% 4 7 11 36.4% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 2021 7 13 20 35.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 2013 4 9 13 30.8% 8 8 16 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
30 2024 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2016 1 5 6 16.7% 6 1 7 85.7% 1 1 2 50.0%
31 2025 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2017 6 7 13 46.2% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 3 3 6 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 0 3 3 0.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0%
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1 4 5 20.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
Career — 75 100 175 42.9% 8 20 28 28.6% 4 13 17 23.5% — 27 55 82 32.9% 30 37 67 44.8% 1 8 9 11.1%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 195/218 of Saisai Zheng's and 144/156 of Mandy Minella's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Saisai Zheng Mandy Minella
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 2011 2/2 0.0 0.5 57.0% 46.2% 38.1% 48.6% 17.7% 43.0% 38.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2012 5/5 0.8 1.2 59.6% 59.8% 41.1% 51.6% 46.4% 52.1% 43.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2013 4/4 1.8 3.8 63.2% 56.7% 39.1% 50.4% 42.0% 50.4% 45.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2014 8/12 1.6 1.4 66.9% 56.0% 51.5% 45.6% 52.8% 54.4% 45.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2015 20/31 0.9 2.2 66.6% 52.7% 45.0% 41.5% 52.4% 50.4% 40.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2016 34/37 0.9 2.1 63.7% 56.5% 46.6% 51.9% 45.9% 52.5% 44.2% 2008 1/1 1.0 3.0 56.6% 43.3% 34.8% 45.5% 100.0% 39.6% 17.2%
23 2017 15/15 1.2 2.2 65.3% 54.2% 43.1% 51.6% 58.7% 49.8% 38.9% 2009 1/1 1.0 4.0 54.3% 56.0% 45.2% 27.3% 50.0% 51.1% 46.7%
24 2018 21/25 0.9 2.0 66.8% 58.5% 45.1% 54.0% 49.2% 54.0% 45.2% 2010 4/4 0.3 3.5 61.3% 63.2% 47.1% 58.6% 26.0% 57.1% 41.4%
25 2019 44/44 1.4 2.7 64.7% 59.2% 44.3% 49.7% 45.7% 53.7% 43.6% 2011 6/8 2.2 3.2 56.2% 63.3% 39.8% 58.7% 52.7% 52.9% 38.1%
26 2020 10/10 1.3 2.0 70.3% 62.9% 43.1% 43.5% 45.9% 57.5% 46.4% 2012 24/25 1.7 3.1 60.8% 57.7% 41.7% 55.6% 49.8% 51.6% 41.9%
27 2021 26/27 0.9 1.8 67.3% 58.4% 47.9% 53.1% 43.0% 54.9% 42.5% 2013 25/30 2.3 2.3 61.6% 61.4% 45.2% 47.9% 50.5% 55.0% 42.2%
28 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2014 4/6 3.3 3.3 59.6% 59.0% 46.7% 53.7% 55.3% 54.5% 42.7%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 4/6 1.0 1.5 75.9% 52.7% 50.0% 42.1% 44.0% 52.2% 43.0%
30 2024 6/6 1.0 3.3 62.2% 51.9% 44.6% 40.1% 45.4% 49.1% 39.6% 2016 15/15 2.1 2.9 63.0% 62.2% 46.3% 52.9% 50.1% 56.2% 43.4%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 22/22 2.9 1.7 61.2% 61.3% 43.0% 50.3% 53.3% 54.0% 39.7%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 14/14 1.9 1.8 64.2% 60.6% 46.1% 59.5% 53.6% 55.3% 43.7%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 14/14 1.9 2.1 66.3% 58.8% 46.3% 42.2% 40.4% 54.7% 39.4%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 1/1 14.0 2.0 56.1% 78.3% 36.1% 80.0% 0.0% 59.8% 32.4%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 9/9 4.9 1.8 59.9% 55.3% 41.5% 39.1% 53.5% 49.9% 43.6%
Career — 195/220 1.1 2.2 65.4% 57.2% 45.2% 49.6% 47.4% 52.9% 43.1% — 144/158 2.3 2.4 62.1% 59.9% 44.2% 50.9% 49.6% 53.9% 41.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Saisai Zheng Mandy Minella
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 2011 1474 95.9 -1.89 -2.23 0.676 41.1% — — — 0.0% -4.25 — — — +0.25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2012 1483 99.4 -0.72 -1.45 0.900 48.2% +11 — — 33.3% -1.55 0–1 1–0 — +0.37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2013 1468 100.9 -1.08 +0.55 0.920 48.0% +5 — — 30.0% -1.00 1–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.17 2005 1477 97.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.75 — — — -0.08
20 2014 1553 119.6 -1.26 +0.86 1.006 49.7% +9 — — 53.3% -0.23 2–4 (33%) 1–1 — -0.37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2015 1496 110.7 -5.38 -1.24 0.811 45.6% +9 +30 +74 30.9% -1.50 5–3 (63%) 2–1 (67%) 105.2 -0.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2016 1542 123.0 -2.10 +1.09 0.930 48.2% +24 -74 +9 40.0% -0.83 0–8 (0%) 2–2 (50%) 91.8 +0.81 2008 1474 104.0 +0.43 -0.56 0.286 31.7% — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.25
23 2017 1619 110.1 -3.22 -1.56 0.775 44.5% -8 -100 — 34.2% -1.42 5–3 (63%) 3–1 (75%) 104.9 -0.08 2009 1466 100.5 +0.41 -1.66 0.954 48.7% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — -0.07
24 2018 1679 118.9 -1.21 +1.53 0.983 49.6% +22 -169 -79 54.5% +0.13 3–4 (43%) 0–1 — +1.42 2010 1504 115.0 +0.56 +1.62 0.965 49.2% +11 — — 50.0% -0.25 — — — -0.16
25 2019 1750 134.4 -2.18 +0.80 0.942 48.7% -10 -123 -200 48.0% -0.28 8–6 (57%) 11–3 (79%) 107.3 +0.31 2011 1473 100.2 -1.79 -2.50 0.809 46.5% +18 — — 33.3% -1.24 2–3 (40%) 1–0 — +0.53
26 2020 1768 132.2 +0.85 +2.96 1.090 51.7% -8 — — 58.3% +0.58 2–2 (50%) 1–1 — +0.03 2012 1515 104.1 -2.82 -1.73 0.865 47.1% +13 +39 — 41.7% -0.78 7–3 (70%) 2–4 (33%) 103.3 +1.92
27 2021 1686 121.1 -1.18 -0.16 0.941 48.6% -18 -68 — 38.7% -0.89 4–4 (50%) 1–1 — -0.36 2013 1530 114.7 -0.44 -1.67 0.939 48.7% -27 +47 — 40.3% -0.65 7–5 (58%) 3–4 (43%) 104.1 +0.65
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1497 105.8 -1.89 -0.14 0.938 48.7% -22 — — 23.1% -1.46 0–1 — — -0.11
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1449 99.2 -1.50 -0.06 0.898 47.4% — +69 — 26.7% -1.27 1–2 (33%) — — +0.30
30 2024 1548 93.3 -2.71 -2.47 0.779 44.6% -4 — — 26.7% -1.73 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — +0.51 2016 1557 110.4 -0.20 -0.12 0.990 50.0% -122 +110 — 51.6% -0.06 3–4 (43%) 3–2 (60%) 101.8 -0.48
31 2025 1492 101.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.25 — 0–2 — -0.05 2017 1577 112.5 -1.48 -2.69 0.863 47.2% -14 +86 -35 43.1% -0.90 3–4 (43%) 4–0 (100%) 104.7 +0.14
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1616 112.5 -0.68 -0.84 0.978 49.8% -45 +52 — 46.4% -0.18 1–1 1–3 (25%) — -0.14
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1549 114.7 -0.94 -2.06 0.869 47.0% -39 +79 — 32.4% -1.03 1–5 (17%) 2–2 (50%) 96.0 -0.47
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1536 101.2 -3.10 +0.34 0.804 47.3% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — +0.06
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1537 108.6 -3.18 -1.37 0.870 46.8% -39 +69 — 29.4% -1.06 0–1 0–1 — +0.05
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1500 100.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1777 123.8 -2.10 +0.33 0.915 48.0% +3 -88 -35 41.7% -0.74 31–38 (45%) 23–16 (59%) 104.4 +1.33 — 1646 113.9 -1.32 -1.45 0.899 47.9% -22 +64 -35 38.8% -0.81 25–30 (45%) 16–16 (50%) 102.2 +1.20

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.