H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Saisai Zheng vs Polona Hercog H2H: 1-0
Saisai Zheng holds a 1–0 lead over Polona Hercog in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Saisai Zheng leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Saisai Zheng won the 2015 Shenzhen fourth round 6-3 2-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHN
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
SLO
Age 35
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 9, 2015* | Shenzhen | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Saisai Zheng | 6-3 2-6 6-2 | Polona Hercog | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Saisai Zheng | #692 | #34 | 1,585 | 1,776 | 83 | 130 | 39.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Polona Hercog | #228 | #35 | 1,605 | 1,768 | 170 | 212 | 44.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Saisai Zheng | Polona Hercog | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2011 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #276 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #375 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #138 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #245 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #145 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #68 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #100 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #47 | 1,671 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 9–22 | 29.0% | #72 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #36 | 1,699 | 0 | 1 |
| 2016 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #85 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #76 | 1,676 | 0 | 2 |
| 2017 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #93 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #65 | 1,701 | 0 | 2 |
| 2018 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #38 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #97 | 1,647 | 0 | 2 |
| 2019 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #42 | 1,749 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #73 | 1,609 | 0 | 2 |
| 2020 | 6–4 | 60.0% | #41 | 1,767 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #143 | 1,573 | 0 | 2 |
| 2021 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #79 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #101 | 1,584 | 0 | 2 |
| 2024 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #692 | 1,550 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #85 | 1,626 | 0 | 2 |
| 2025 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #692 | 1,493 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #49 | 1,714 | 0 | 3 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #49 | 1,683 | 0 | 3 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 4–15 | 21.1% | #134 | 1,590 | 0 | 3 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #267 | 1,565 | 0 | 3 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #228 | 1,628 | 0 | 3 |