H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:30 UTC
Saisai Zheng vs Roberta Vinci H2H: 0-1
Roberta Vinci holds a 1–0 lead over Saisai Zheng in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Roberta Vinci leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Roberta Vinci won the 2016 Beijing second round 6-0 3-6 5-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHN
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 43
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2, 2016 | Beijing | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Roberta Vinci | 6-0 3-6 5-3 | Saisai Zheng | Match data |
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Saisai Zheng | #692 | #34 | 1,585 | 1,776 | 83 | 130 | 39.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Roberta Vinci | #193 | #7 | 3,615 | 1,923 | 320 | 287 | 52.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 10 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Saisai Zheng | Roberta Vinci | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2011 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #276 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #168 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #138 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #184 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #145 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #119 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #100 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #116 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 9–22 | 29.0% | #72 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #41 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #85 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #85 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #93 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #73 | 1,561 | 0 | 1 |
| 2018 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #38 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #84 | 1,585 | 0 | 1 |
| 2019 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #42 | 1,749 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #63 | 1,663 | 0 | 2 |
| 2020 | 6–4 | 60.0% | #41 | 1,767 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 28–20 | 58.3% | #38 | 1,817 | 0 | 3 |
| 2021 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #79 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 37–24 | 60.7% | #23 | 1,774 | 0 | 6 |
| 2024 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #692 | 1,550 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 44–27 | 62.0% | #16 | 1,834 | 0 | 7 |
| 2025 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #692 | 1,493 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 46–23 | 66.7% | #14 | 1,853 | 0 | 9 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 21–26 | 44.7% | #47 | 1,712 | 0 | 9 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #15 | 1,765 | 0 | 9 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 28–22 | 56.0% | #18 | 1,733 | 0 | 10 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #116 | 1,610 | 0 | 10 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #193 | 1,628 | 0 | 10 |