H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Sara Errani vs Shelby Rogers H2H: 0-2

Shelby Rogers holds a 2–0 lead over Sara Errani in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Shelby Rogers leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Shelby Rogers won the 2016 US Open first round 6-4 7-6(3).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Sara Errani
Italy Age 39 Right-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main-draw meetings
Shelby Rogers
United States Age 33 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Shelby Rogers #49 6-4 7-6(3) Sara Errani #28 Match data Aug 31, 2016* R128 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Shelby Rogers #147 7-6(12) 6-3 Sara Errani #14 Match data Jul 12, 2014* SF Bad Gastein International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Sara Errani #476 #5 5,835 2,005 387 304 56.0% 0 0 0 1 8 9
Shelby Rogers #437 #30 1,698 1,855 126 140 47.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sara Errani Shelby Rogers
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 2010 0–1 0.0% #352 1,494 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2011 0–1 0.0% #426 1,479 0 0
19 2006 3–3 50.0% #174 1,529 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2007 10–7 58.8% #69 1,613 0 0 2013 2–3 40.0% #126 1,478 0 0
21 2008 29–22 56.9% #42 1,735 0 2 2014 12–9 57.1% #72 1,630 0 0
22 2009 25–27 48.1% #47 1,655 0 2 2015 4–14 22.2% #151 1,527 0 0
23 2010 36–29 55.4% #43 1,722 0 2 2016 13–15 46.4% #59 1,585 0 0
24 2011 30–26 53.6% #45 1,673 0 2 2017 23–19 54.8% #59 1,689 0 0
25 2012 53–20 72.6% #6 1,897 0 6 2018 0–2 0.0% #630 1,650 0 0
26 2013 46–22 67.6% #7 1,885 0 7 2019 3–9 25.0% #177 1,574 0 0
27 2014 35–23 60.3% #14 1,773 0 7 2020 8–6 57.1% #60 1,679 0 0
28 2015 46–26 63.9% #20 1,751 0 8 2021 28–21 57.1% #40 1,804 0 0
29 2016 21–23 47.7% #49 1,656 0 9 2022 20–19 51.3% #47 1,804 0 0
30 2017 18–16 52.9% #144 1,652 0 9 2023 9–13 40.9% #149 1,773 0 0
31 2018 6–8 42.9% #112 1,767 0 9 2024 4–8 33.3% #341 1,675 0 0
32 2019 2–6 25.0% #198 1,575 0 9 — — — — — — —
33 2020 4–3 57.1% #131 1,606 0 9 — — — — — — —
34 2021 8–12 40.0% #121 1,574 0 9 — — — — — — —
35 2022 2–5 28.6% #109 1,606 0 9 — — — — — — —
36 2023 3–10 23.1% #105 1,548 0 9 — — — — — — —
37 2024 10–14 41.7% #105 1,693 0 9 — — — — — — —
38 2025 0–2 0.0% #476 1,590 0 9 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Sara Errani Shelby Rogers
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 2006 — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2007 4 3 7 57.1% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — — — — — 2013 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — —
21 2008 14 10 24 58.3% 14 10 24 58.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2014 8 6 14 57.1% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — —
22 2009 16 14 30 53.3% 8 9 17 47.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2015 2 8 10 20.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
23 2010 21 16 37 56.8% 11 10 21 52.4% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2016 5 10 15 33.3% 8 4 12 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
24 2011 14 16 30 46.7% 13 7 20 65.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2017 13 12 25 52.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
25 2012 23 14 37 62.2% 28 3 31 90.3% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2018 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2013 22 15 37 59.5% 21 5 26 80.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 2019 0 2 2 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
27 2014 13 14 27 48.1% 19 6 25 76.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 2020 8 5 13 61.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
28 2015 22 17 39 56.4% 22 7 29 75.9% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2021 20 12 32 62.5% 5 6 11 45.5% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
29 2016 13 14 27 48.1% 7 7 14 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2022 14 11 25 56.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — —
30 2017 7 6 13 53.8% 11 8 19 57.9% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2023 6 7 13 46.2% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
31 2018 1 2 3 33.3% 5 6 11 45.5% — — — — — — — — 2024 1 5 6 16.7% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — —
32 2019 0 2 2 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2020 1 1 2 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2021 2 6 8 25.0% 6 6 12 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2022 0 1 1 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2023 1 3 4 25.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2024 4 6 10 40.0% 6 7 13 46.2% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2025 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 178 160 338 52.7% 188 115 303 62.0% 15 26 41 36.6% 6 3 9 66.7% — 77 82 159 48.4% 38 40 78 48.7% 11 18 29 37.9% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 593/692 of Sara Errani's and 252/266 of Shelby Rogers's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Sara Errani Shelby Rogers
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 1/1 2.0 9.0 49.2% 68.9% 41.3% 60.0% 60.0% 54.8% 35.5%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 1/1 3.0 4.0 51.7% 54.8% 51.7% 37.5% 22.2% 53.3% 36.7%
19 2006 1/6 0.0 1.0 76.4% 33.3% 38.5% 50.0% 16.7% 34.5% 39.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2007 12/17 0.8 2.3 66.1% 56.1% 48.0% 41.1% 52.6% 53.4% 44.4% 2013 3/5 4.0 1.3 62.8% 67.6% 53.3% 59.4% 27.8% 62.3% 34.2%
21 2008 34/51 0.5 2.7 64.2% 57.6% 46.0% 48.1% 45.8% 53.2% 45.7% 2014 20/21 3.3 3.5 59.4% 66.1% 43.5% 47.9% 39.3% 57.1% 42.8%
22 2009 44/52 0.3 2.5 69.2% 55.6% 44.7% 50.9% 45.1% 52.5% 44.6% 2015 13/18 1.8 4.1 61.1% 58.1% 48.5% 48.5% 41.6% 54.1% 35.9%
23 2010 59/65 0.4 1.5 75.4% 56.2% 44.0% 55.5% 51.2% 53.4% 47.7% 2016 25/28 3.5 3.0 59.2% 65.0% 50.8% 53.1% 54.6% 59.3% 43.0%
24 2011 53/56 0.4 1.9 76.2% 57.7% 47.2% 52.0% 48.6% 55.0% 47.1% 2017 40/42 3.4 2.5 61.9% 65.3% 49.1% 54.4% 51.6% 59.1% 41.4%
25 2012 63/73 0.3 1.1 76.1% 60.2% 49.9% 54.1% 56.5% 57.5% 51.5% 2018 2/2 5.0 5.0 57.9% 60.1% 48.5% 36.8% 57.7% 55.1% 40.1%
26 2013 57/68 0.1 1.1 82.1% 57.9% 48.5% 52.4% 51.1% 56.1% 50.4% 2019 12/12 4.9 3.4 58.6% 62.2% 47.5% 50.8% 52.1% 56.2% 43.6%
27 2014 54/58 0.1 1.2 81.3% 56.1% 45.3% 52.4% 50.1% 54.1% 48.1% 2020 14/14 4.2 2.6 60.1% 67.3% 48.7% 55.8% 53.6% 59.4% 39.3%
28 2015 54/72 0.1 1.4 83.3% 54.9% 50.0% 49.2% 55.4% 54.2% 49.7% 2021 49/49 4.0 2.4 62.3% 67.1% 50.2% 54.5% 49.2% 60.6% 43.8%
29 2016 38/45 0.1 1.2 85.4% 52.9% 43.6% 51.6% 52.4% 51.5% 48.0% 2022 38/39 4.3 3.0 60.1% 67.1% 49.9% 58.3% 49.5% 60.2% 40.2%
30 2017 31/34 0.1 1.3 78.7% 52.5% 41.2% 40.6% 54.1% 50.3% 49.6% 2023 22/22 3.7 2.9 60.1% 68.2% 45.8% 55.2% 50.0% 59.0% 39.0%
31 2018 14/14 0.1 2.9 81.3% 57.5% 36.7% 41.9% 45.6% 53.8% 46.0% 2024 12/12 2.2 2.3 58.0% 64.8% 47.7% 51.0% 41.6% 57.3% 40.4%
32 2019 8/8 0.1 8.0 61.0% 51.0% 28.4% 30.1% 44.3% 42.3% 46.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2020 7/7 0.0 4.6 77.6% 54.9% 39.2% 58.2% 57.5% 51.3% 51.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2021 19/20 0.1 2.9 78.4% 52.1% 36.1% 52.3% 55.8% 48.5% 49.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2022 7/7 0.0 1.9 80.7% 52.1% 33.4% 39.3% 47.1% 48.4% 45.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2023 13/13 0.0 1.5 79.1% 47.8% 31.7% 36.6% 49.8% 44.5% 41.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2024 23/24 0.1 1.5 77.5% 52.4% 42.3% 41.1% 47.1% 49.8% 44.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
38 2025 2/2 0.0 1.5 82.0% 53.3% 47.6% 49.5% 75.0% 52.2% 36.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 593/692 0.2 1.7 77.3% 55.8% 44.9% 49.9% 51.1% 53.3% 47.9% — 252/266 3.7 2.9 60.5% 65.7% 48.7% 53.7% 48.8% 58.9% 41.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Sara Errani Shelby Rogers
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1494 105.0 +0.17 +0.58 0.785 45.7% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 1–1 — -0.10
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1479 95.8 -4.03 -4.58 0.787 43.9% — — — 33.3% -2.33 0–1 — — +0.08
19 2006 1529 107.3 -2.72 -1.03 0.604 36.7% — +41 — 46.2% -0.39 1–0 1–0 — -0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2007 1614 121.3 -0.77 +0.04 0.953 49.0% -56 +20 — 55.0% +0.43 4–2 (67%) 3–2 (60%) 103.4 -0.20 2013 1478 105.2 +0.56 -2.93 0.907 49.1% — +62 — 50.0% +0.17 0–2 — — +0.53
21 2008 1735 135.4 -1.78 +1.64 0.976 49.4% -49 -6 -147 53.8% +0.34 10–7 (59%) 4–5 (44%) 102.2 -1.64 2014 1631 132.2 +1.08 -0.03 0.997 49.8% -30 -7 — 53.2% +0.15 4–1 (80%) 4–3 (57%) 105.7 -0.57
22 2009 1655 132.5 -2.62 +1.07 0.938 48.6% +1 +49 -81 50.9% +0.04 5–7 (42%) 6–3 (67%) 100.5 +0.75 2015 1528 107.8 -2.17 -3.76 0.783 44.7% +11 +55 — 28.2% -1.67 0–3 (0%) 0–3 (0%) 92.8 -0.14
23 2010 1723 134.3 -2.26 +3.11 1.025 50.6% +16 -53 -104 56.5% +0.29 6–11 (35%) 12–6 (67%) 100.8 +1.24 2016 1585 127.2 +2.25 +0.12 1.057 51.1% -39 +110 — 49.3% +0.09 5–8 (38%) 4–4 (50%) 97.4 +0.44
24 2011 1673 134.0 -0.30 +3.09 1.047 51.0% -6 +66 -54 54.0% +0.26 7–11 (39%) 5–6 (45%) 97.1 -1.90 2017 1689 133.0 +2.26 -1.35 1.011 50.1% -50 +54 -96 52.0% +0.14 10–8 (56%) 10–4 (71%) 108.3 -1.20
25 2012 1898 155.0 +1.80 +6.73 1.210 54.4% -78 +149 -273 69.0% +1.52 11–5 (69%) 7–3 (70%) 107.8 -1.43 2018 1650 103.6 -2.39 -1.26 0.893 47.6% — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–2 0–2 — +0.21
26 2013 1886 156.0 +1.16 +6.37 1.149 53.2% -27 +186 — 62.2% +0.85 10–5 (67%) 6–5 (55%) 103.2 -0.44 2019 1574 111.3 -0.80 -0.46 0.996 50.1% — +121 +52 44.8% -0.31 0–7 (0%) 2–2 (50%) — -0.20
27 2014 1774 140.1 -1.37 +3.74 1.048 51.1% -49 +280 — 58.0% +0.40 9–10 (47%) 10–6 (63%) 95.0 +2.02 2020 1680 132.2 +1.94 -0.55 0.967 49.3% +16 — — 51.5% -0.12 4–1 (80%) 3–2 (60%) 106.2 +0.47
28 2015 1752 137.5 -3.26 +7.03 1.083 52.0% -25 +216 -179 58.6% +0.66 18–11 (62%) 12–6 (67%) 104.0 +3.08 2021 1805 147.1 +3.43 +1.34 1.111 52.0% +24 -149 -144 57.1% +0.48 6–10 (38%) 8–6 (57%) 96.6 -0.42
29 2016 1657 128.4 -3.45 +3.74 0.989 49.8% +7 +192 -112 49.5% -0.14 5–8 (38%) 8–5 (62%) 94.9 +0.33 2022 1804 144.1 +2.94 -1.21 1.009 50.3% +44 -170 -145 52.2% -0.08 6–10 (38%) 7–2 (78%) 99.2 -1.95
30 2017 1652 117.1 -4.83 +3.87 0.998 49.9% +19 +108 — 53.3% +0.13 5–4 (56%) 6–2 (75%) 103.4 +0.62 2023 1773 137.9 +1.67 -1.25 0.951 49.1% +77 -140 — 42.6% -0.41 5–7 (42%) 0–6 (0%) 92.1 -1.29
31 2018 1767 125.7 -0.84 +2.69 0.996 50.0% +17 -5 — 48.5% -0.21 1–4 (20%) 2–1 (67%) 96.4 -1.13 2024 1676 122.2 -0.04 -0.79 0.948 48.6% +36 -21 — 32.0% -1.00 1–0 0–1 — -0.39
32 2019 1575 92.5 -7.16 -0.74 0.798 44.2% — +37 — 31.6% -1.74 1–2 (33%) — — +0.92 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2020 1607 122.5 -2.17 +3.15 1.053 51.1% — +33 — 55.6% +0.06 2–2 (50%) 1–1 — -0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2021 1575 114.0 -4.44 +2.94 0.966 49.1% -11 +76 — 39.5% -0.79 2–3 (40%) 1–3 (25%) 97.1 -0.94 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2022 1607 109.2 -3.27 +0.30 0.881 46.5% — +45 — 35.7% -0.64 1–1 0–1 — -0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2023 1548 97.8 -6.59 -1.63 0.755 43.4% -51 +75 -7 24.1% -2.07 2–1 (67%) 0–1 — -0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2024 1693 123.6 -4.63 +1.30 0.884 47.1% -121 +82 — 37.7% -0.94 5–0 (100%) 1–2 (33%) 106.5 -1.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2025 1590 105.5 -0.55 +0.36 0.771 45.0% — — — 20.0% -1.60 0–1 0–1 — -0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2006 138.5 -1.81 +3.71 1.026 50.6% -25 +106 -122 54.6% +0.29 105–95 (53%) 85–59 (59%) 104.5 -0.06 — 1856 140.0 +1.85 -0.58 1.004 50.0% +8 -8 -100 48.9% -0.10 41–61 (40%) 39–36 (52%) 94.4 -1.71

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.