H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Shelby Rogers vs Jill Craybas H2H: 0-1

Jill Craybas holds a 1–0 lead over Shelby Rogers in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jill Craybas leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jill Craybas won the 2011 Charleston Open round of 64 3-6 6-2 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Shelby Rogers
United States Age 33 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Jill Craybas
USA Age 52 Right-Handed 160 cm / 5'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jill Craybas #110 3-6 6-2 6-0 Shelby Rogers #335 Match data Apr 6, 2011* R64 Charleston Open Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Shelby Rogers #437 #30 1,698 1,855 126 140 47.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Jill Craybas #336 #39 974 1,693 161 257 38.5% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Shelby Rogers Jill Craybas
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2010 0–1 0.0% #352 1,494 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2011 0–1 0.0% #426 1,479 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2013 2–3 40.0% #126 1,478 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 2014 12–9 57.1% #72 1,630 0 0 1996 0–1 0.0% — 1,488 0 0
22 2015 4–14 22.2% #151 1,527 0 0 — — — — — — —
23 2016 13–15 46.4% #59 1,585 0 0 1998 0–1 0.0% #154 1,473 0 0
24 2017 23–19 54.8% #59 1,689 0 0 1999 0–4 0.0% #175 1,445 0 0
25 2018 0–2 0.0% #630 1,650 0 0 2000 1–2 33.3% #145 1,449 0 0
26 2019 3–9 25.0% #177 1,574 0 0 2001 8–17 32.0% #98 1,479 0 0
27 2020 8–6 57.1% #60 1,679 0 0 2002 19–15 55.9% #57 1,652 0 1
28 2021 28–21 57.1% #40 1,804 0 0 2003 16–22 42.1% #99 1,568 0 1
29 2022 20–19 51.3% #47 1,804 0 0 2004 12–21 36.4% #59 1,496 0 1
30 2023 9–13 40.9% #149 1,773 0 0 2005 19–23 45.2% #48 1,612 0 1
31 2024 4–8 33.3% #341 1,675 0 0 2006 18–25 41.9% #70 1,567 0 1
32 — — — — — — — 2007 12–27 30.8% #79 1,472 0 1
33 — — — — — — — 2008 22–26 45.8% #64 1,571 0 1
34 — — — — — — — 2009 12–21 36.4% #76 1,590 0 1
35 — — — — — — — 2010 12–23 34.3% #98 1,546 0 1
36 — — — — — — — 2011 6–20 23.1% #150 1,442 0 1
37 — — — — — — — 2012 3–7 30.0% #189 1,448 0 1
38 — — — — — — — 2013 1–2 33.3% #336 1,451 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Shelby Rogers Jill Craybas
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 2010 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2011 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2013 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2014 8 6 14 57.1% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — 1996 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2015 2 8 10 20.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2016 5 10 15 33.3% 8 4 12 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1998 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2017 13 12 25 52.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 1999 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
25 2018 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2019 0 2 2 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2001 5 8 13 38.5% 3 6 9 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 2020 8 5 13 61.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2002 12 8 20 60.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
28 2021 20 12 32 62.5% 5 6 11 45.5% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2003 11 14 25 44.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 2022 14 11 25 56.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 2004 10 14 24 41.7% 0 5 5 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
30 2023 6 7 13 46.2% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2005 10 15 25 40.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 3 1 4 75.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
31 2024 1 5 6 16.7% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2006 13 15 28 46.4% 4 6 10 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 9 17 26 34.6% 3 7 10 30.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 14 15 29 48.3% 8 9 17 47.1% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 9 12 21 42.9% 2 8 10 20.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 6 13 19 31.6% 5 8 13 38.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 3 11 14 21.4% 3 7 10 30.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1 2 3 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 77 82 159 48.4% 38 40 78 48.7% 11 18 29 37.9% — — — — — 104 152 256 40.6% 44 77 121 36.4% 12 22 34 35.3% 1 6 7 14.3%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 252/266 of Shelby Rogers's and 212/350 of Jill Craybas's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Shelby Rogers Jill Craybas
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 2010 1/1 2.0 9.0 49.2% 68.9% 41.3% 60.0% 60.0% 54.8% 35.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2011 1/1 3.0 4.0 51.7% 54.8% 51.7% 37.5% 22.2% 53.3% 36.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2013 3/5 4.0 1.3 62.8% 67.6% 53.3% 59.4% 27.8% 62.3% 34.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2014 20/21 3.3 3.5 59.4% 66.1% 43.5% 47.9% 39.3% 57.1% 42.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2015 13/18 1.8 4.1 61.1% 58.1% 48.5% 48.5% 41.6% 54.1% 35.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2016 25/28 3.5 3.0 59.2% 65.0% 50.8% 53.1% 54.6% 59.3% 43.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2017 40/42 3.4 2.5 61.9% 65.3% 49.1% 54.4% 51.6% 59.1% 41.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 2018 2/2 5.0 5.0 57.9% 60.1% 48.5% 36.8% 57.7% 55.1% 40.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 2019 12/12 4.9 3.4 58.6% 62.2% 47.5% 50.8% 52.1% 56.2% 43.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2020 14/14 4.2 2.6 60.1% 67.3% 48.7% 55.8% 53.6% 59.4% 39.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2021 49/49 4.0 2.4 62.3% 67.1% 50.2% 54.5% 49.2% 60.6% 43.8% 2003 3/38 0.3 3.0 64.3% 52.0% 37.3% 34.9% 52.8% 47.1% 35.2%
29 2022 38/39 4.3 3.0 60.1% 67.1% 49.9% 58.3% 49.5% 60.2% 40.2% 2004 6/33 0.2 2.2 63.7% 60.8% 46.8% 53.4% 42.0% 55.7% 45.5%
30 2023 22/22 3.7 2.9 60.1% 68.2% 45.8% 55.2% 50.0% 59.0% 39.0% 2005 7/42 0.6 3.1 66.5% 54.8% 41.1% 49.7% 52.7% 50.1% 46.6%
31 2024 12/12 2.2 2.3 58.0% 64.8% 47.7% 51.0% 41.6% 57.3% 40.4% 2006 24/43 1.1 3.0 63.8% 58.5% 43.9% 52.8% 54.0% 53.3% 45.2%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 29/39 1.1 2.6 62.4% 54.5% 45.8% 48.4% 50.3% 51.3% 42.8%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 40/48 0.8 3.3 66.3% 58.5% 43.8% 50.7% 47.2% 53.7% 46.8%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 31/33 0.5 3.7 62.0% 58.5% 41.9% 45.7% 48.8% 52.3% 43.6%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 34/35 1.1 2.9 64.2% 58.1% 40.4% 43.9% 50.1% 52.0% 41.2%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 25/26 0.7 2.8 62.7% 56.2% 40.4% 52.8% 38.8% 50.4% 38.8%
37 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 10/10 0.5 3.1 65.4% 54.2% 35.3% 44.1% 56.6% 47.6% 41.2%
38 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 3/3 0.7 3.3 63.5% 49.9% 34.0% 44.0% 42.9% 44.5% 41.0%
Career — 252/266 3.7 2.9 60.5% 65.7% 48.7% 53.7% 48.8% 58.9% 41.3% — 212/418 0.8 3.1 63.9% 57.2% 42.2% 48.5% 48.6% 51.9% 43.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Shelby Rogers Jill Craybas
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 2010 1494 105.0 +0.17 +0.58 0.785 45.7% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 1–1 — -0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2011 1479 95.8 -4.03 -4.58 0.787 43.9% — — — 33.3% -2.33 0–1 — — +0.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2013 1478 105.2 +0.56 -2.93 0.907 49.1% — +62 — 50.0% +0.17 0–2 — — +0.53 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2014 1631 132.2 +1.08 -0.03 0.997 49.8% -30 -7 — 53.2% +0.15 4–1 (80%) 4–3 (57%) 105.7 -0.57 1996 1488 98.3 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.11
22 2015 1528 107.8 -2.17 -3.76 0.783 44.7% +11 +55 — 28.2% -1.67 0–3 (0%) 0–3 (0%) 92.8 -0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2016 1585 127.2 +2.25 +0.12 1.057 51.1% -39 +110 — 49.3% +0.09 5–8 (38%) 4–4 (50%) 97.4 +0.44 1998 1473 98.9 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — +0.19
24 2017 1689 133.0 +2.26 -1.35 1.011 50.1% -50 +54 -96 52.0% +0.14 10–8 (56%) 10–4 (71%) 108.3 -1.20 1999 1445 107.1 — — — — +24 — — 0.0% -2.75 — 0–2 — -0.12
25 2018 1650 103.6 -2.39 -1.26 0.893 47.6% — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–2 0–2 — +0.21 2000 1450 103.4 — — — — +23 — — 42.9% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.02
26 2019 1574 111.3 -0.80 -0.46 0.996 50.1% — +121 +52 44.8% -0.31 0–7 (0%) 2–2 (50%) — -0.20 2001 1479 110.7 — — — — +12 -6 — 36.2% -0.76 3–5 (38%) 1–4 (20%) 95.6 +0.19
27 2020 1680 132.2 +1.94 -0.55 0.967 49.3% +16 — — 51.5% -0.12 4–1 (80%) 3–2 (60%) 106.2 +0.47 2002 1653 112.4 — — — — -22 -155 -43 47.4% -0.45 10–4 (71%) 3–1 (75%) 110.1 +0.70
28 2021 1805 147.1 +3.43 +1.34 1.111 52.0% +24 -149 -144 57.1% +0.48 6–10 (38%) 8–6 (57%) 96.6 -0.42 2003 1568 113.2 -2.11 -2.34 0.665 41.6% +3 -51 +44 41.7% -0.71 5–7 (42%) 6–4 (60%) 99.2 +1.02
29 2022 1804 144.1 +2.94 -1.21 1.009 50.3% +44 -170 -145 52.2% -0.08 6–10 (38%) 7–2 (78%) 99.2 -1.95 2004 1496 110.5 +0.38 -0.09 1.027 50.9% +36 -67 +114 36.4% -0.95 7–6 (54%) 5–6 (45%) 99.3 +1.31
30 2023 1773 137.9 +1.67 -1.25 0.951 49.1% +77 -140 — 42.6% -0.41 5–7 (42%) 0–6 (0%) 92.1 -1.29 2005 1613 122.1 -2.41 +0.28 0.934 48.6% -42 -142 +91 47.6% -0.21 8–11 (42%) 3–4 (43%) 100.0 -0.12
31 2024 1676 122.2 -0.04 -0.79 0.948 48.6% +36 -21 — 32.0% -1.00 1–0 0–1 — -0.39 2006 1568 125.6 -2.28 +0.59 0.968 49.4% +22 -85 +99 43.4% -0.28 6–9 (40%) 3–4 (43%) 96.1 +0.78
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1472 114.0 -3.51 -1.24 0.880 47.3% +42 -2 +117 36.0% -1.19 3–8 (27%) 4–5 (44%) 95.0 -1.20
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1571 125.0 -1.47 +1.80 1.013 50.2% +18 -32 — 47.7% 0.00 4–7 (36%) 7–8 (47%) 97.9 +0.82
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1591 120.2 -2.51 -0.54 0.914 48.2% +29 -121 — 39.5% -0.76 4–6 (40%) 2–3 (40%) 97.8 -0.89
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1546 110.5 -3.17 -1.80 0.858 46.7% +33 -58 -16 34.6% -1.23 5–5 (50%) 4–0 (100%) — +0.09
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1442 107.4 -4.00 -4.02 0.783 44.8% +81 0 — 30.0% -1.53 2–6 (25%) 0–1 — +0.38
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1449 101.1 -4.12 -1.62 0.786 44.7% +63 +2 — 38.1% -1.71 1–2 (33%) 3–1 (75%) 101.9 +0.05
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1451 96.4 -3.73 -1.77 0.738 42.8% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.02
Career — 1856 140.0 +1.85 -0.58 1.004 50.0% +8 -8 -100 48.9% -0.10 41–61 (40%) 39–36 (52%) 94.4 -1.71 — 1694 119.3 -2.71 -0.73 0.898 47.7% +18 -60 +55 40.2% -0.73 58–79 (42%) 41–43 (49%) 96.8 +0.80

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.