H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Shelby Rogers vs Mariana Duque-Mariño H2H: 1-1
Shelby Rogers and Mariana Duque-Mariño are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Mariana Duque-Mariño won the 2017 Washington DC quarterfinal 6-4 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 33
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
COL
Age 36
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 31, 2017 | Washington DC | WTA 500 | QF | Hard | Mariana Duque-Mariño | 6-4 6-1 | Shelby Rogers | Match data |
| Mar 11, 2016* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R128 | Hard | Shelby Rogers | 6-1 4-6 6-3 | Mariana Duque-Mariño | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shelby Rogers | #437 | #30 | 1,698 | 1,875 | 126 | 138 | 47.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mariana Duque-Mariño | #709 | #66 | 923 | 1,657 | 48 | 82 | 36.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Shelby Rogers | Mariana Duque-Mariño | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #352 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #201 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #426 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #109 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #192 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2013 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #126 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #126 | 1,453 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2014 | 12–9 | 57.1% | #72 | 1,631 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #191 | 1,439 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2015 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #151 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #145 | 1,492 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2016 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #103 | 1,483 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2017 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #59 | 1,691 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #131 | 1,454 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2018 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #630 | 1,652 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #78 | 1,556 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2019 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #177 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #110 | 1,576 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2020 | 8–6 | 57.1% | #60 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #107 | 1,605 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2021 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #40 | 1,802 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #110 | 1,530 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2022 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #47 | 1,820 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2023 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #149 | 1,778 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2024 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #341 | 1,678 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |