H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Shelby Rogers vs Veronica Cepede Royg H2H: 2-0
Shelby Rogers holds a 2–0 lead over Veronica Cepede Royg in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Shelby Rogers leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Shelby Rogers won the 2017 Charleston second round 6-7(1) 6-3 7-6(6).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 33
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
PAR
Age 34
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 5, 2017* | Charleston | WTA 500 | R64 | Clay | Shelby Rogers | 6-7(1) 6-3 7-6(6) | Veronica Cepede Royg | Match data |
| Feb 17, 2016 | Rio de Janeiro | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Shelby Rogers | 7-5 6-4 | Veronica Cepede Royg | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shelby Rogers | #437 | #30 | 1,698 | 1,875 | 126 | 138 | 47.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Veronica Cepede Royg | #917 | #73 | 820 | 1,692 | 26 | 41 | 38.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Shelby Rogers | Veronica Cepede Royg | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #352 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #426 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2013 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #126 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2014 | 12–9 | 57.1% | #72 | 1,631 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2015 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #151 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #164 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2016 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #141 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2017 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #59 | 1,691 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #129 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2018 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #630 | 1,652 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #75 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2019 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #177 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #138 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2020 | 8–6 | 57.1% | #60 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2021 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #40 | 1,802 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2022 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #47 | 1,820 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2023 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #149 | 1,778 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2024 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #341 | 1,678 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |