H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Shuai Zhang vs Agnieszka Radwanska H2H: 0-4
Agnieszka Radwanska holds a 4–0 lead over Shuai Zhang in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Agnieszka Radwanska leads 3–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Agnieszka Radwanska won the 2017 Beijing third round 7-5 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHN
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0
–
4
4 main draw meetings
POL
Age 37
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 3, 2017 | Beijing | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Agnieszka Radwanska | 7-5 7-5 | Shuai Zhang | Match data |
| Jan 8, 2016* | Shenzhen | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Agnieszka Radwanska | 6-1 7-5 | Shuai Zhang | Match data |
| May 28, 2014* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Agnieszka Radwanska | 6-3 6-0 | Shuai Zhang | Match data |
| Oct 4, 2012* | Beijing | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Agnieszka Radwanska | 6-2 6-3 | Shuai Zhang | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shuai Zhang | #54 | #22 | 1,905 | 1,856 | 225 | 288 | 43.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Agnieszka Radwanska | #74 | #2 | 8,530 | 2,081 | 506 | 237 | 68.1% | 0 | 5 | 1 | 8 | 6 | 20 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Shuai Zhang | Agnieszka Radwanska | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #203 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #61 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #149 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #26 | 1,808 | 0 | 1 |
| 2008 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #235 | 1,412 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 51–19 | 72.9% | #10 | 1,926 | 0 | 4 |
| 2009 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #154 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 44–23 | 65.7% | #10 | 1,910 | 0 | 4 |
| 2010 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #90 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 32–18 | 64.0% | #14 | 1,860 | 0 | 4 |
| 2011 | 8–22 | 26.7% | #126 | 1,443 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 46–18 | 71.9% | #8 | 1,979 | 0 | 7 |
| 2012 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #127 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 59–19 | 75.6% | #4 | 1,994 | 0 | 10 |
| 2013 | 9–4 | 69.2% | #52 | 1,599 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 56–20 | 73.7% | #5 | 1,957 | 0 | 13 |
| 2014 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #61 | 1,602 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 43–22 | 66.2% | #6 | 1,872 | 0 | 14 |
| 2015 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #139 | 1,519 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 50–22 | 69.4% | #5 | 1,957 | 0 | 17 |
| 2016 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #23 | 1,722 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 51–18 | 73.9% | #3 | 1,942 | 0 | 20 |
| 2017 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #36 | 1,762 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #28 | 1,812 | 0 | 20 |
| 2018 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #40 | 1,726 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #74 | 1,727 | 0 | 20 |
| 2019 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #40 | 1,680 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2020 | 12–10 | 54.5% | #35 | 1,731 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #60 | 1,632 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 34–26 | 56.7% | #25 | 1,732 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 4–18 | 18.2% | #245 | 1,525 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #205 | 1,576 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #81 | 1,731 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #54 | 1,714 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |