H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Shuai Zhang vs Daria Saville H2H: 2-3
Daria Saville holds a 3–2 lead over Shuai Zhang in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Daria Saville leads 2–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Daria Saville won the 2024 Miami first round 6-4 2-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHN
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2
–
3
5 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 32
Right-Handed
166 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 21, 2024* | Miami | WTA 1000 | R128 | Hard | Daria Saville | 6-4 2-6 6-4 | Shuai Zhang | Match data |
| Mar 11, 2022* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R128 | Hard | Daria Saville | 6-3 6-2 | Shuai Zhang | Match data |
| Jun 27, 2019* | Eastbourne | WTA 500 | R32 | Grass | Shuai Zhang | 6-3 6-1 | Daria Saville | Match data |
| Oct 13, 2018* | Hong Kong | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Shuai Zhang | 6-1 6-3 | Daria Saville | Match data |
| Apr 7, 2016* | Charleston | WTA 500 | R32 | Clay | Daria Saville | 6-4 6-0 | Shuai Zhang | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shuai Zhang | #54 | #22 | 1,905 | 1,856 | 225 | 288 | 43.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Daria Saville | #226 | #20 | 2,135 | 1,836 | 156 | 153 | 50.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Shuai Zhang | Daria Saville | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #203 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #539 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #149 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #226 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #235 | 1,412 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #149 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #154 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #233 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #90 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #36 | 1,671 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 8–22 | 26.7% | #126 | 1,443 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 25–19 | 56.8% | #25 | 1,810 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #127 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #25 | 1,791 | 0 | 1 |
| 2013 | 9–4 | 69.2% | #52 | 1,599 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #35 | 1,786 | 0 | 1 |
| 2014 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #61 | 1,602 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #242 | 1,614 | 0 | 1 |
| 2015 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #139 | 1,519 | 0 | 1 | 2020 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #450 | 1,627 | 0 | 1 |
| 2016 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #23 | 1,722 | 0 | 1 | 2021 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #419 | 1,653 | 0 | 1 |
| 2017 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #36 | 1,762 | 0 | 2 | 2022 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #53 | 1,754 | 0 | 1 |
| 2018 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #40 | 1,726 | 0 | 2 | 2023 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #204 | 1,692 | 0 | 1 |
| 2019 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #40 | 1,680 | 0 | 2 | 2024 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #108 | 1,671 | 0 | 1 |
| 2020 | 12–10 | 54.5% | #35 | 1,731 | 0 | 2 | 2025 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #197 | 1,647 | 0 | 1 |
| 2021 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #60 | 1,632 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 34–26 | 56.7% | #25 | 1,732 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 4–18 | 18.2% | #245 | 1,525 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #205 | 1,576 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #81 | 1,731 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #54 | 1,714 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |