H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Shuai Zhang vs Rebecca Peterson H2H: 0-2

Rebecca Peterson holds a 2–0 lead over Shuai Zhang in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Rebecca Peterson leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Rebecca Peterson won the 2023 Indian Wells Open second round 3-0 RET.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Shuai Zhang
China Age 37 Right-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main-draw meetings
Rebecca Peterson
Sweden Age 31 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Rebecca Peterson #103 3-0 (ret.) Shuai Zhang #27 Match data Mar 11, 2023* R64 Indian Wells Open WTA 1000 Hard
Rebecca Peterson #139 6-2 6-1 Shuai Zhang #33 Match data Mar 1, 2018 QF Acapulco International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Shuai Zhang #54 #22 1,905 1,857 232 294 44.1% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Rebecca Peterson #573 #43 1,332 1,861 80 95 45.7% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Shuai Zhang Rebecca Peterson
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 2012 0–1 0.0% — 1,488 0 0
17 2006 0–1 0.0% #203 1,495 0 0 2013 0–1 0.0% #263 1,484 0 0
18 2007 0–3 0.0% #149 1,464 0 0 2014 1–2 33.3% #230 1,489 0 0
19 2008 0–6 0.0% #235 1,412 0 0 2015 3–4 42.9% #131 1,505 0 0
20 2009 2–1 66.7% #154 1,467 0 0 2016 3–6 33.3% #146 1,505 0 0
21 2010 3–4 42.9% #90 1,492 0 0 2017 2–3 40.0% #174 1,550 0 0
22 2011 8–22 26.7% #126 1,445 0 0 2018 10–11 47.6% #63 1,693 0 0
23 2012 2–6 25.0% #127 1,457 0 0 2019 25–18 58.1% #44 1,861 0 2
24 2013 9–4 69.2% #52 1,598 0 1 2020 3–10 23.1% #55 1,697 0 2
25 2014 18–24 42.9% #61 1,600 0 1 2021 18–18 50.0% #88 1,699 0 2
26 2015 4–12 25.0% #139 1,518 0 1 2022 7–14 33.3% #119 1,659 0 2
27 2016 26–21 55.3% #23 1,774 0 1 2023 8–7 53.3% #127 1,647 0 2
28 2017 23–24 48.9% #36 1,774 0 2 — — — — — — —
29 2018 28–27 50.9% #40 1,726 0 2 — — — — — — —
30 2019 18–23 43.9% #40 1,681 0 2 — — — — — — —
31 2020 12–10 54.5% #35 1,733 0 2 — — — — — — —
32 2021 15–24 38.5% #60 1,631 0 2 — — — — — — —
33 2022 34–26 56.7% #25 1,733 0 3 — — — — — — —
34 2023 4–18 18.2% #245 1,524 0 3 — — — — — — —
35 2024 5–12 29.4% #205 1,574 0 3 — — — — — — —
36 2025 10–7 58.8% #81 1,731 0 3 — — — — — — —
37 2026 11–19 36.7% #54 1,698 0 3 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Shuai Zhang Rebecca Peterson
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
17 2006 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2013 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
18 2007 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2014 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
19 2008 0 5 5 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2015 1 1 2 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
20 2009 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — 2016 2 2 4 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — —
21 2010 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2017 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
22 2011 7 17 24 29.2% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2018 7 6 13 53.8% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
23 2012 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2019 17 9 26 65.4% 6 6 12 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
24 2013 8 3 11 72.7% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2020 2 6 8 25.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — —
25 2014 10 15 25 40.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2021 15 13 28 53.6% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
26 2015 1 6 7 14.3% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 2022 4 8 12 33.3% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 2016 24 15 39 61.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 2023 7 3 10 70.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0%
28 2017 18 14 32 56.3% 3 7 10 30.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2018 22 19 41 53.7% 6 6 12 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2019 11 15 26 42.3% 1 4 5 20.0% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2020 7 7 14 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2021 6 13 19 31.6% 4 8 12 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2022 22 15 37 59.5% 4 8 12 33.3% 8 3 11 72.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2023 4 10 14 28.6% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2024 5 10 15 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2025 9 5 14 64.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2026 7 9 16 43.8% 3 7 10 30.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 168 191 359 46.8% 38 72 110 34.5% 26 31 57 45.6% — 58 51 109 53.2% 18 34 52 34.6% 4 10 14 28.6%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 495/529 of Shuai Zhang's and 168/174 of Rebecca Peterson's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Shuai Zhang Rebecca Peterson
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 1/1 1.0 3.0 64.3% 41.7% 40.0% 45.5% 66.7% 41.1% 42.2%
18 2007 1/3 0.0 2.0 55.8% 62.1% 39.1% 42.9% 100.0% 51.9% 22.7% 2014 3/3 0.7 4.0 64.5% 51.3% 36.8% 49.5% 42.5% 46.3% 44.1%
19 2008 6/6 0.8 3.2 68.8% 53.0% 45.1% 47.6% 38.3% 50.3% 38.5% 2015 5/7 0.8 4.8 70.0% 57.3% 48.6% 36.8% 50.3% 55.0% 41.0%
20 2009 2/3 0.0 4.0 65.6% 47.9% 49.0% 39.4% 37.9% 48.5% 42.7% 2016 9/9 1.6 3.6 68.4% 61.4% 41.7% 48.7% 51.7% 55.4% 40.7%
21 2010 6/7 0.2 5.3 72.2% 51.8% 31.0% 48.7% 46.7% 46.1% 42.2% 2017 5/5 2.2 3.2 64.2% 63.6% 48.6% 73.1% 59.8% 58.0% 42.1%
22 2011 28/30 0.6 2.5 69.3% 54.9% 39.3% 47.4% 41.5% 50.2% 39.4% 2018 21/21 3.6 3.7 63.7% 62.9% 41.3% 57.6% 50.4% 55.0% 43.1%
23 2012 8/8 1.1 3.0 64.8% 56.8% 35.6% 43.8% 44.0% 49.6% 41.2% 2019 42/43 2.2 2.8 67.1% 61.9% 50.4% 57.2% 44.5% 58.0% 43.3%
24 2013 11/13 1.5 1.5 64.9% 68.1% 47.0% 62.4% 49.6% 60.4% 48.0% 2020 13/13 1.5 2.8 66.5% 55.9% 44.5% 36.8% 30.4% 51.8% 39.5%
25 2014 38/42 1.2 1.9 68.5% 57.4% 45.2% 51.5% 49.8% 53.8% 43.0% 2021 34/36 2.3 3.4 65.5% 62.2% 47.7% 52.4% 47.4% 57.1% 41.3%
26 2015 14/16 1.6 2.8 66.9% 60.1% 45.8% 51.2% 59.4% 55.0% 42.9% 2022 20/21 1.9 3.7 63.7% 61.1% 42.5% 45.1% 45.0% 54.0% 39.8%
27 2016 38/50 0.9 1.7 66.2% 58.7% 48.2% 49.5% 56.1% 55.2% 45.5% 2023 15/15 2.1 4.1 65.3% 64.3% 40.5% 53.5% 51.5% 55.9% 45.3%
28 2017 44/47 2.9 2.7 63.5% 65.5% 43.9% 54.0% 49.5% 57.6% 44.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2018 55/55 2.3 2.6 63.7% 63.6% 46.9% 52.4% 47.8% 57.3% 43.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2019 41/41 2.1 2.8 62.7% 62.5% 44.0% 51.7% 47.7% 55.7% 41.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2020 22/22 2.0 2.5 67.4% 61.9% 48.0% 48.9% 50.6% 57.2% 43.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2021 39/39 1.5 2.9 64.7% 59.8% 43.1% 53.0% 43.0% 54.0% 39.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2022 58/60 2.1 2.2 65.7% 64.3% 48.1% 45.8% 47.7% 58.8% 42.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2023 22/22 1.2 2.9 61.1% 57.6% 39.6% 41.4% 52.3% 50.6% 37.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2024 17/17 1.5 2.1 64.9% 61.4% 43.5% 45.0% 40.9% 55.0% 39.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2025 15/18 2.6 2.9 67.0% 60.0% 39.9% 39.2% 47.8% 53.4% 45.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2026 30/30 1.4 2.1 68.8% 60.1% 47.4% 54.3% 41.8% 56.1% 39.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 495/530 1.7 2.5 65.6% 60.9% 44.8% 49.9% 48.0% 55.3% 42.2% — 168/175 2.2 3.4 65.7% 61.3% 45.5% 52.1% 46.5% 55.8% 42.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Shuai Zhang Rebecca Peterson
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1488 95.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.02
17 2006 1495 104.8 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 — — -0.25 2013 1485 102.5 +3.18 +1.91 0.716 41.7% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.28
18 2007 1464 103.0 -1.60 +0.26 0.473 38.5% +16 — — 0.0% -2.67 — 0–1 — -0.21 2014 1490 101.8 -1.67 +0.24 0.821 45.5% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.10
19 2008 1413 101.8 -1.83 -2.28 0.775 44.3% +21 — — 14.3% -2.21 0–2 0–2 — -0.06 2015 1505 104.6 -0.71 -1.19 0.911 47.7% — -1 — 37.5% -1.06 2–0 1–1 — -0.09
20 2009 1468 120.7 +2.65 +2.50 0.830 45.6% +21 — — 66.7% +0.33 — 1–0 — -0.05 2016 1506 107.2 -0.91 -1.94 0.911 48.2% +59 -42 — 42.1% -0.37 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.28
21 2010 1492 103.6 -3.51 -1.21 0.783 44.3% +26 — — 37.5% -1.19 2–0 1–1 — +0.51 2017 1550 106.4 +0.60 -1.14 1.003 50.3% +49 — — 45.5% -0.36 0–1 0–1 — -0.10
22 2011 1445 108.6 -4.27 -3.16 0.790 44.9% +24 +34 — 30.8% -1.57 3–4 (43%) 1–6 (14%) 96.1 -0.05 2018 1693 125.9 -0.84 -0.13 0.960 49.2% +26 -250 -63 46.7% -0.22 2–3 (40%) 2–4 (33%) 98.7 +0.29
23 2012 1457 113.5 -2.34 +0.08 0.817 45.5% +14 — — 23.5% -1.71 1–0 0–1 — -0.17 2019 1862 140.3 +1.54 +0.91 1.032 50.8% -2 -323 -222 53.6% +0.22 11–6 (65%) 5–5 (50%) 106.5 -2.59
24 2013 1599 123.5 +2.33 +1.26 1.212 54.5% -6 — — 70.4% +1.52 0–1 2–0 — +0.48 2020 1698 103.7 -2.62 -2.51 0.819 45.3% +41 -190 — 20.8% -2.08 1–1 2–3 (40%) — +0.28
25 2014 1600 117.2 -1.75 -0.53 0.931 48.5% -53 -65 +35 42.9% -0.46 10–6 (63%) 4–4 (50%) 105.2 +0.61 2021 1700 129.0 +0.81 -0.92 0.963 49.2% +11 -79 — 49.4% -0.04 6–7 (46%) 6–6 (50%) 103.0 -0.71
26 2015 1518 110.7 -2.05 -0.11 0.952 48.8% -20 -5 — 33.3% -0.83 0–4 (0%) 0–3 (0%) 92.0 -0.54 2022 1659 117.2 -1.27 -2.53 0.866 47.2% +49 -54 — 33.3% -0.89 2–3 (40%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.50
27 2016 1775 138.9 -0.62 +2.34 1.016 50.3% +20 -282 — 52.6% +0.18 8–1 (89%) 5–6 (45%) 106.8 -0.50 2023 1647 126.0 -0.31 +1.31 1.028 50.7% +73 -62 — 48.5% +0.12 3–2 (60%) 0–4 (0%) 97.8 -0.35
28 2017 1775 137.4 +0.89 +0.70 1.045 51.0% +50 -290 -233 50.9% +0.34 8–10 (44%) 7–8 (47%) 99.0 +0.05 2024 1645 — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2018 1727 132.0 +0.70 +0.72 1.025 50.7% +26 -168 — 52.4% +0.02 5–9 (36%) 9–8 (53%) 96.6 +2.55 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2019 1682 131.5 -0.59 -1.30 0.946 49.1% -17 -99 -24 47.7% -0.17 4–6 (40%) 5–1 (83%) 102.8 +0.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2020 1733 131.8 0.00 +0.35 1.003 50.0% -62 -39 — 52.0% -0.06 4–2 (67%) 5–3 (63%) 104.9 -0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2021 1632 116.8 -1.99 -2.77 0.869 47.1% -13 -16 +97 43.2% -0.80 2–5 (29%) 5–3 (63%) 97.9 +0.69 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2022 1733 139.5 +1.53 -0.47 1.023 50.4% -6 -140 +117 53.4% +0.09 6–2 (75%) 11–8 (58%) 106.7 +1.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2023 1524 112.2 -4.74 -4.13 0.755 43.8% +90 -25 +193 28.3% -1.61 1–5 (17%) 1–2 (33%) 94.2 +0.93 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2024 1575 131.2 -0.87 -2.36 0.873 47.3% +48 — — 35.1% -1.08 0–3 (0%) 2–1 (67%) 97.8 -0.76 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2025 1731 134.6 -2.26 +1.21 0.975 49.2% +29 — — 50.0% -0.25 6–0 (100%) 1–2 (33%) 108.2 -1.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2026 1698 130.8 -0.76 -1.93 0.899 47.7% +2 -169 +62 39.7% -0.74 3–5 (38%) 4–1 (80%) 100.8 -0.18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1858 134.2 -0.75 -0.61 0.945 48.8% +10 -114 +39 45.4% -0.37 63–66 (49%) 64–61 (51%) 103.1 +0.61 — 1862 129.7 0.00 -0.51 0.952 49.0% +25 -149 -151 44.3% -0.36 28–25 (53%) 18–28 (39%) 101.5 -2.22

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.