H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC
Shuai Zhang vs Victoria Azarenka H2H: 0-3
Victoria Azarenka holds a 3–0 lead over Shuai Zhang in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Victoria Azarenka leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Victoria Azarenka won the 2021 Chicago 2 second round 6-2 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHN
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0
–
3
3 main draw meetings
BLR
Age 36
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 29, 2021* | Chicago 2 | WTA 500 | R64 | Hard | Victoria Azarenka | 6-2 6-1 | Shuai Zhang | Match data |
| May 15, 2019* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Victoria Azarenka | 6-2 6-1 | Shuai Zhang | Match data |
| Mar 14, 2016* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Victoria Azarenka | 6-4 6-3 | Shuai Zhang | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shuai Zhang | #54 | #22 | 1,905 | 1,856 | 225 | 288 | 43.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Victoria Azarenka | #449 | #1 | 10,955 | 2,203 | 575 | 266 | 68.4% | 2 | 10 | 0 | 6 | 3 | 21 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Shuai Zhang | Victoria Azarenka | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #203 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #152 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #149 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #92 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #235 | 1,412 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 30–16 | 65.2% | #30 | 1,815 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #154 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 38–19 | 66.7% | #15 | 1,870 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #90 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 45–15 | 75.0% | #7 | 1,933 | 0 | 3 |
| 2011 | 8–22 | 26.7% | #126 | 1,443 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 42–20 | 67.7% | #10 | 1,945 | 0 | 5 |
| 2012 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #127 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 55–18 | 75.3% | #3 | 2,003 | 0 | 8 |
| 2013 | 9–4 | 69.2% | #52 | 1,599 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 64–11 | 85.3% | #1 | 2,134 | 1 | 14 |
| 2014 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #61 | 1,602 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 43–12 | 78.2% | #2 | 2,068 | 2 | 17 |
| 2015 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #139 | 1,519 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 15–9 | 62.5% | #31 | 1,946 | 2 | 17 |
| 2016 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #23 | 1,722 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 31–14 | 68.9% | #22 | 1,954 | 2 | 17 |
| 2017 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #36 | 1,762 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 24–5 | 82.8% | #13 | 1,979 | 2 | 20 |
| 2018 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #40 | 1,726 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #205 | 1,962 | 2 | 20 |
| 2019 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #40 | 1,680 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 17–12 | 58.6% | #51 | 1,873 | 2 | 20 |
| 2020 | 12–10 | 54.5% | #35 | 1,731 | 0 | 2 | 2019 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #50 | 1,846 | 2 | 20 |
| 2021 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #60 | 1,632 | 0 | 2 | 2020 | 19–6 | 76.0% | #13 | 1,966 | 2 | 21 |
| 2022 | 34–26 | 56.7% | #25 | 1,732 | 0 | 3 | 2021 | 29–14 | 67.4% | #27 | 1,977 | 2 | 21 |
| 2023 | 4–18 | 18.2% | #245 | 1,525 | 0 | 3 | 2022 | 24–14 | 63.2% | #26 | 1,921 | 2 | 21 |
| 2024 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #205 | 1,576 | 0 | 3 | 2023 | 23–21 | 52.3% | #22 | 1,779 | 2 | 21 |
| 2025 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #81 | 1,731 | 0 | 3 | 2024 | 30–15 | 66.7% | #20 | 1,895 | 2 | 21 |
| 2026 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #54 | 1,714 | 0 | 3 | 2025 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #132 | 1,828 | 2 | 21 |