H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Simona Halep vs Renata Voracova H2H: 2-0
Simona Halep holds a 2–0 lead over Renata Voracova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Simona Halep leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Simona Halep won the 2010 Bad Gastein third round 7-5 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ROU
Age 34
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 42
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 22, 2010* | Bad Gastein | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Simona Halep | 7-5 6-2 | Renata Voracova | Match data |
| May 1, 2010* | Fes | WTA 250 | SF | Clay | Simona Halep | 7-5 6-4 | Renata Voracova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Simona Halep | #873 | #1 | 8,290 | 2,111 | 446 | 197 | 69.4% | 2 | 10 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 24 |
| Renata Voracova | #1,041 | #74 | 848 | 1,523 | 24 | 54 | 30.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Simona Halep | Renata Voracova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2010 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #84 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #128 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2011 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #47 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #145 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2012 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #47 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2013 | 50–17 | 74.6% | #11 | 2,004 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2014 | 46–18 | 71.9% | #3 | 1,969 | 0 | 8 | 2006 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #155 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2015 | 49–16 | 75.4% | #2 | 1,929 | 0 | 11 | 2007 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #107 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2016 | 41–14 | 74.5% | #4 | 1,997 | 0 | 14 | 2008 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #147 | 1,452 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2017 | 44–18 | 71.0% | #1 | 1,973 | 0 | 15 | 2009 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #126 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2018 | 45–12 | 78.9% | #1 | 2,005 | 1 | 18 | 2010 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #81 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2019 | 39–16 | 70.9% | #4 | 1,938 | 2 | 19 | 2011 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #184 | 1,441 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2020 | 23–3 | 88.5% | #2 | 2,056 | 2 | 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2021 | 24–13 | 64.9% | #20 | 1,949 | 2 | 22 | 2013 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #212 | 1,466 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2022 | 39–13 | 75.0% | #10 | 1,986 | 2 | 24 | 2014 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #169 | 1,442 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #253 | 1,420 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2024 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #873 | 1,913 | 2 | 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2025 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #873 | 1,887 | 2 | 24 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #844 | 1,396 | 0 | 0 |