H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Stefanie Voegele vs Gisela Dulko H2H: 0-1

Gisela Dulko holds a 1–0 lead over Stefanie Voegele in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Gisela Dulko leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Gisela Dulko won the 2009 Hobart International first round 6-2 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Stefanie Voegele
Switzerland Age 36 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Gisela Dulko
ARG Age 41 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Gisela Dulko #50 6-2 6-3 Stefanie Voegele #126 Match data Jan 13, 2009* R32 Hobart International International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Stefanie Voegele #1,075 #42 1,255 1,700 100 173 36.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Gisela Dulko #305 #26 1,695 1,797 192 181 51.5% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Stefanie Voegele Gisela Dulko
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 2001 0–1 0.0% #188 1,487 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 2002 4–3 57.1% #154 1,527 0 0
18 2008 0–2 0.0% #124 1,486 0 0 2003 5–7 41.7% #125 1,516 0 0
19 2009 10–9 52.6% #75 1,559 0 0 2004 22–19 53.7% #33 1,705 0 0
20 2010 9–22 29.0% #135 1,504 0 0 2005 32–23 58.2% #26 1,725 0 0
21 2011 1–1 50.0% #138 1,518 0 0 2006 16–23 41.0% #59 1,573 0 0
22 2012 2–7 22.2% #92 1,498 0 0 2007 29–23 55.8% #37 1,698 0 2
23 2013 21–20 51.2% #50 1,664 0 0 2008 18–21 46.2% #51 1,629 0 3
24 2014 14–23 37.8% #79 1,544 0 0 2009 28–20 58.3% #36 1,730 0 3
25 2015 7–17 29.2% #119 1,510 0 0 2010 21–21 50.0% #48 1,687 0 3
26 2016 10–14 41.7% #114 1,517 0 0 2011 15–15 50.0% #67 1,651 0 4
27 2017 5–4 55.6% #169 1,650 0 0 2012 2–5 28.6% #305 1,605 0 4
28 2018 9–17 34.6% #83 1,594 0 0 — — — — — — —
29 2019 6–15 28.6% #119 1,594 0 0 — — — — — — —
30 2020 1–5 16.7% #116 1,602 0 0 — — — — — — —
31 2021 4–12 25.0% #147 1,537 0 0 — — — — — — —
32 2022 1–5 16.7% #260 1,497 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Stefanie Voegele Gisela Dulko
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1 2 3 33.3% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — —
18 2008 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2003 0 1 1 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
19 2009 6 6 12 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2004 17 12 29 58.6% 3 5 8 37.5% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
20 2010 8 13 21 38.1% 1 7 8 12.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2005 20 16 36 55.6% 8 5 13 61.5% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
21 2011 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2006 6 13 19 31.6% 7 8 15 46.7% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
22 2012 0 5 5 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2007 18 13 31 58.1% 11 7 18 61.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 2013 13 13 26 50.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 2008 3 13 16 18.8% 11 6 17 64.7% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
24 2014 10 13 23 43.5% 4 7 11 36.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2009 12 9 21 57.1% 14 9 23 60.9% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
25 2015 6 10 16 37.5% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2010 11 12 23 47.8% 10 8 18 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
26 2016 5 7 12 41.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2011 6 11 17 35.3% 9 4 13 69.2% — — — — — — — —
27 2017 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1 4 5 20.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
28 2018 6 10 16 37.5% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2019 4 10 14 28.6% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2020 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2021 1 7 8 12.5% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2022 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 66 106 172 38.4% 29 48 77 37.7% 4 17 21 19.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — 95 107 202 47.0% 81 58 139 58.3% 15 14 29 51.7% 1 2 3 33.3%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 262/273 of Stefanie Voegele's and 229/365 of Gisela Dulko's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Stefanie Voegele Gisela Dulko
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 2008 2/2 1.5 5.0 60.0% 55.1% 33.6% 16.3% 35.9% 46.4% 44.3% 2003 1/12 2.0 5.0 57.5% 58.5% 47.9% 57.1% 30.8% 54.0% 40.2%
19 2009 19/19 2.7 3.2 55.6% 66.8% 41.1% 47.3% 48.0% 55.2% 43.4% 2004 9/41 3.0 4.9 55.9% 67.7% 45.0% 46.7% 55.4% 58.0% 42.7%
20 2010 30/31 2.8 2.4 56.1% 60.6% 44.0% 42.9% 45.1% 53.4% 42.3% 2005 6/55 2.3 4.8 56.5% 59.6% 39.2% 49.8% 44.7% 50.9% 48.8%
21 2011 2/2 3.5 2.5 58.4% 56.9% 43.4% 50.0% 34.7% 51.7% 40.6% 2006 26/39 1.5 4.9 59.7% 59.1% 42.3% 49.9% 52.7% 52.2% 42.9%
22 2012 8/9 2.5 4.1 53.6% 59.9% 42.3% 48.9% 33.7% 51.9% 41.9% 2007 36/52 1.0 4.3 61.7% 58.4% 42.9% 47.3% 47.6% 52.4% 43.2%
23 2013 40/41 3.5 2.7 54.9% 66.3% 46.8% 48.5% 40.8% 57.6% 41.9% 2008 35/39 1.4 3.5 61.9% 59.3% 47.2% 48.7% 48.3% 54.7% 43.0%
24 2014 36/37 4.4 1.9 56.4% 64.9% 42.8% 47.4% 49.5% 55.2% 42.3% 2009 44/48 2.7 4.2 58.1% 66.0% 44.8% 56.5% 48.7% 56.8% 44.9%
25 2015 17/24 3.1 2.3 60.4% 60.0% 45.8% 54.8% 47.5% 54.2% 37.1% 2010 39/42 2.3 3.8 60.6% 60.6% 46.5% 50.4% 51.1% 55.0% 46.3%
26 2016 24/24 2.6 1.8 56.8% 61.1% 42.5% 48.6% 43.8% 53.2% 42.7% 2011 28/30 2.0 4.3 57.2% 65.6% 43.9% 55.2% 49.5% 56.4% 45.7%
27 2017 9/9 3.9 3.0 55.5% 63.6% 42.5% 53.3% 44.0% 54.3% 42.0% 2012 5/7 0.6 5.0 52.5% 48.8% 36.6% 30.4% 34.6% 43.0% 40.8%
28 2018 26/26 3.3 1.9 56.8% 64.0% 47.0% 49.9% 36.3% 56.4% 38.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2019 21/21 2.2 2.8 56.8% 62.3% 40.6% 44.6% 46.9% 53.0% 41.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2020 6/6 2.0 3.0 53.4% 63.9% 39.8% 43.6% 31.9% 52.8% 40.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2021 16/16 2.4 2.8 56.4% 59.0% 42.2% 53.8% 40.4% 51.7% 40.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2022 6/6 0.8 3.7 51.6% 51.5% 31.0% 44.0% 48.0% 42.1% 40.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 262/273 3.0 2.5 56.2% 62.8% 43.4% 47.9% 43.5% 54.3% 41.4% — 229/373 1.9 4.2 59.5% 61.5% 44.5% 50.8% 49.2% 54.5% 44.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Stefanie Voegele Gisela Dulko
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1488 98.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.01
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1528 110.5 — — — — -9 +54 — 46.7% +0.27 2–1 (67%) — — +0.54
18 2008 1486 102.6 +0.81 +2.45 0.828 45.1% — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–2 1–0 — -0.30 2003 1516 103.4 -0.14 -1.46 0.874 47.6% -8 +76 — 36.0% -0.44 2–1 (67%) 0–3 (0%) 99.3 +0.47
19 2009 1559 110.5 -1.00 -0.45 0.970 48.9% -15 — +110 44.4% -0.20 7–0 (100%) 0–3 (0%) 107.0 +1.19 2004 1706 135.1 +1.79 -0.44 1.017 50.3% -27 -95 -100 52.9% -0.25 3–4 (43%) 9–1 (90%) 106.2 -0.94
20 2010 1504 114.4 -2.38 -0.92 0.908 47.8% +41 -52 — 37.7% -0.88 1–8 (11%) 4–5 (44%) 92.7 +0.26 2005 1725 129.6 -1.55 +1.29 0.994 49.6% -23 -48 -80 55.8% +0.32 11–8 (58%) 7–5 (58%) 105.8 +0.73
21 2011 1518 101.1 -0.37 -0.64 0.842 46.1% — — — 50.0% -1.00 — — — -0.21 2006 1574 115.8 -2.53 -1.31 0.898 47.8% +11 +73 +112 44.0% -0.75 3–5 (38%) 7–5 (58%) 98.0 +1.89
22 2012 1498 112.2 -1.83 -0.15 0.870 46.8% -12 +15 — 31.8% -1.23 1–3 (25%) — — -0.33 2007 1699 129.5 -2.86 -0.86 0.906 47.9% +7 -19 — 53.8% +0.26 8–7 (53%) 6–3 (67%) 104.8 +0.85
23 2013 1665 132.8 +0.93 -1.21 0.988 49.8% -31 -48 -123 46.9% -0.05 14–4 (78%) 5–8 (38%) 112.4 -0.72 2008 1630 120.3 -0.30 -0.40 0.950 49.0% -74 +137 +31 46.3% -0.11 7–3 (70%) 4–6 (40%) 103.7 -1.13
24 2014 1544 116.4 -1.15 -1.36 0.944 48.6% +18 +54 — 43.7% -0.69 3–12 (20%) 6–6 (50%) 91.8 +0.91 2009 1731 135.0 +0.97 +0.64 1.040 50.8% -69 +46 -30 55.7% +0.42 7–3 (70%) 5–6 (45%) 102.2 -0.13
25 2015 1511 109.4 -3.15 -3.22 0.811 46.1% +55 +2 — 30.2% -1.26 3–4 (43%) 2–4 (33%) 97.9 -0.11 2010 1687 136.7 -0.13 +2.36 1.028 50.5% -9 +74 — 49.5% -0.11 7–8 (47%) 4–9 (31%) 96.3 -1.55
26 2016 1517 103.6 -2.18 -1.45 0.912 48.0% +27 +22 -70 42.0% -0.72 3–3 (50%) 0–2 — +1.52 2011 1652 134.5 +0.74 +1.84 1.047 50.8% -36 +153 — 51.6% +0.16 3–3 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 101.6 -0.48
27 2017 1651 123.2 -0.54 +0.06 0.918 48.3% +32 — — 50.0% -0.25 2–0 1–0 — +0.12 2012 1606 102.0 -2.95 +0.27 0.715 41.8% -21 — — 15.4% -2.54 1–0 0–1 — -0.18
28 2018 1594 119.0 +0.12 -3.10 0.884 47.4% +36 -67 -143 39.3% -0.89 3–6 (33%) 2–3 (40%) 97.2 -1.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2019 1594 116.8 -2.79 -1.89 0.882 47.2% +41 -76 — 34.8% -1.02 0–4 (0%) 1–4 (20%) 92.2 -0.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2020 1602 112.7 -0.73 -1.09 0.854 46.6% +29 — — 28.6% -1.57 0–2 1–1 — +0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2021 1538 111.9 -2.04 -1.43 0.834 46.0% +15 -4 — 28.9% -1.40 3–3 (50%) 1–1 — +0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2022 1498 106.8 -4.32 -2.01 0.701 41.9% +78 — — 15.4% -2.46 1–0 — — +0.47 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1700 120.1 -1.29 -1.46 0.904 47.8% +20 -14 -33 39.1% -0.79 41–51 (45%) 24–37 (39%) 96.3 +0.64 — 1798 133.1 -0.56 +0.42 0.974 49.4% -23 +50 -10 50.4% -0.03 54–43 (56%) 44–40 (52%) 107.2 +0.02

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.