H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Su-Wei Hsieh vs Dominika Cibulkova H2H: 0-4

Dominika Cibulkova holds a 4–0 lead over Su-Wei Hsieh in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Dominika Cibulkova leads 3–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Dominika Cibulkova won the 2018 US Open second round 7-6(3) 4-6 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Su-Wei Hsieh
Chinese Taipei Age 40 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0 – 4
4 main-draw meetings
Dominika Cibulkova
SVK Age 37 Right-Handed 161 cm / 5'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Dominika Cibulkova #35 7-6(3) 4-6 6-4 Su-Wei Hsieh #43 Match data Aug 30, 2018* R64 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Dominika Cibulkova #33 6-4 6-1 Su-Wei Hsieh #48 Match data Jul 10, 2018* R16 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Dominika Cibulkova #6 6-4 7-6(8) Su-Wei Hsieh #91 Match data Jan 19, 2017* R64 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Dominika Cibulkova #10 6-1 6-2 Su-Wei Hsieh #126 Match data Apr 18, 2014* R16 Kuala Lumpur International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Su-Wei Hsieh #909 #23 1,960 1,880 153 176 46.5% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Dominika Cibulkova #315 #4 5,245 1,964 368 265 58.1% 0 0 1 4 3 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Su-Wei Hsieh Dominika Cibulkova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 2001 5–2 71.4% #164 1,548 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 2002 0–1 0.0% #267 1,540 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — 2006 2–2 50.0% #153 1,506 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2007 17–17 50.0% #51 1,605 0 0
19 2005 0–3 0.0% #142 1,506 0 0 2008 36–26 58.1% #19 1,843 0 0
20 2006 0–4 0.0% #129 1,462 0 0 2009 20–17 54.1% #28 1,735 0 0
21 2007 1–7 12.5% #157 1,419 0 0 2010 30–24 55.6% #31 1,753 0 0
22 2008 5–8 38.5% #81 1,483 0 0 2011 41–21 66.1% #18 1,894 0 1
23 2009 1–2 33.3% #314 1,473 0 0 2012 34–26 56.7% #15 1,790 0 2
24 2010 0–2 0.0% #362 1,454 0 0 2013 27–23 54.0% #23 1,734 0 3
25 2011 1–1 50.0% #172 1,458 0 0 2014 33–22 60.0% #10 1,719 0 4
26 2012 22–14 61.1% #25 1,672 0 2 2015 19–16 54.3% #38 1,756 0 4
27 2013 13–25 34.2% #86 1,554 0 2 2016 53–21 71.6% #5 1,951 0 8
28 2014 6–12 33.3% #141 1,542 0 2 2017 26–22 54.2% #26 1,778 0 8
29 2015 6–5 54.5% #93 1,581 0 2 2018 28–19 59.6% #25 1,872 0 8
30 2016 12–12 50.0% #87 1,586 0 2 2019 2–9 18.2% #315 1,755 0 8
31 2017 8–15 34.8% #82 1,600 0 2 — — — — — — —
32 2018 32–17 65.3% #28 1,778 0 3 — — — — — — —
33 2019 31–24 56.4% #32 1,781 0 3 — — — — — — —
34 2020 1–7 12.5% #67 1,706 0 3 — — — — — — —
35 2021 9–14 39.1% #108 1,686 0 3 — — — — — — —
37 2023 0–1 0.0% #713 1,658 0 3 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Su-Wei Hsieh Dominika Cibulkova
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 2001 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2002 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 10 12 22 45.5% 7 5 12 58.3% — — — — — — — —
19 2005 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 27 18 45 60.0% 8 6 14 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
20 2006 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2009 7 10 17 41.2% 11 5 16 68.8% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
21 2007 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2010 18 18 36 50.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
22 2008 4 4 8 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2011 29 15 44 65.9% 3 3 6 50.0% 7 2 9 77.8% 2 1 3 66.7%
23 2009 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 19 17 36 52.8% 13 6 19 68.4% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
24 2010 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 19 15 34 55.9% 4 5 9 44.4% 4 2 6 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 2011 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 29 17 46 63.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
26 2012 15 7 22 68.2% 2 3 5 40.0% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — 2015 17 14 31 54.8% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
27 2013 10 18 28 35.7% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2016 37 17 54 68.5% 7 3 10 70.0% 9 1 10 90.0% — — — —
28 2014 6 8 14 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2017 22 15 37 59.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — —
29 2015 5 3 8 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2018 18 11 29 62.1% 5 5 10 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — —
30 2016 6 6 12 50.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2019 1 5 6 16.7% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — —
31 2017 5 9 14 35.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2018 21 9 30 70.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2019 23 16 39 59.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2020 0 5 5 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2021 9 9 18 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2023 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 112 112 224 50.0% 21 37 58 36.2% 20 27 47 42.6% — — — — — 254 185 439 57.9% 72 53 125 57.6% 39 24 63 61.9% 3 3 6 50.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 285/321 of Su-Wei Hsieh's and 558/630 of Dominika Cibulkova's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Su-Wei Hsieh Dominika Cibulkova
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 23/34 0.3 3.9 62.2% 56.6% 46.2% 51.0% 47.4% 52.3% 45.7%
19 2005 1/3 0.0 1.0 68.9% 45.2% 28.6% 44.4% 0.0% 40.0% 31.9% 2008 56/62 0.8 2.7 68.4% 60.8% 48.3% 54.4% 46.5% 56.7% 46.6%
20 2006 2/4 0.0 1.5 70.8% 54.2% 53.1% 56.9% 10.7% 53.2% 36.5% 2009 36/37 0.6 3.3 67.4% 60.0% 49.3% 52.6% 53.6% 56.4% 46.9%
21 2007 3/8 0.3 3.0 58.2% 61.7% 45.8% 57.9% 26.5% 55.0% 34.9% 2010 50/54 1.1 3.7 63.2% 60.8% 46.2% 53.9% 50.9% 55.6% 43.9%
22 2008 11/13 1.1 3.7 53.2% 62.4% 43.3% 51.4% 38.7% 53.6% 42.4% 2011 53/62 1.1 4.2 56.1% 64.9% 46.5% 54.6% 53.9% 56.8% 48.0%
23 2009 3/3 0.3 3.7 58.9% 51.8% 46.8% 29.4% 52.6% 49.8% 48.1% 2012 52/60 1.5 4.2 54.2% 66.3% 45.8% 50.4% 53.3% 56.4% 48.0%
24 2010 2/2 0.5 4.0 60.9% 63.3% 38.7% 52.2% 46.3% 53.7% 43.8% 2013 45/50 0.9 4.8 60.8% 61.9% 44.4% 53.5% 44.6% 55.1% 45.9%
25 2011 2/2 0.0 2.5 62.8% 59.0% 52.3% 72.4% 57.5% 56.4% 54.5% 2014 51/55 0.8 4.3 66.5% 62.6% 45.5% 57.1% 50.5% 57.0% 47.7%
26 2012 29/36 0.6 2.5 64.5% 63.4% 48.2% 50.2% 45.6% 58.1% 47.7% 2015 24/35 1.0 4.1 67.0% 61.0% 48.2% 53.0% 43.9% 56.6% 43.0%
27 2013 33/38 0.7 3.0 62.9% 54.8% 42.6% 45.6% 49.0% 50.2% 43.3% 2016 67/74 1.0 3.2 66.4% 62.7% 47.5% 54.7% 50.3% 57.8% 48.0%
28 2014 14/18 0.9 2.6 61.9% 54.6% 40.0% 41.3% 41.6% 49.3% 42.3% 2017 46/48 0.8 2.9 66.1% 62.2% 48.0% 55.2% 49.2% 57.4% 45.5%
29 2015 7/11 2.1 2.9 61.0% 61.1% 53.7% 55.2% 49.1% 58.2% 41.7% 2018 45/48 1.1 3.9 65.2% 63.3% 48.4% 55.6% 48.6% 58.1% 44.3%
30 2016 24/24 1.1 2.6 58.5% 61.5% 47.9% 48.7% 43.8% 55.8% 43.3% 2019 10/11 0.9 4.5 66.1% 58.8% 45.1% 54.3% 40.4% 54.2% 38.4%
31 2017 23/23 1.1 2.7 63.4% 56.9% 39.7% 45.0% 49.8% 50.5% 44.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2018 46/49 0.8 3.1 63.3% 60.9% 47.5% 57.5% 54.0% 56.0% 47.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2019 53/55 0.7 3.2 64.4% 61.9% 46.6% 51.7% 47.6% 56.5% 44.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2020 8/8 0.1 3.0 61.2% 53.2% 42.9% 42.4% 53.9% 48.9% 40.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2021 23/23 0.7 3.1 64.0% 55.2% 43.8% 49.8% 41.6% 51.7% 43.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2023 1/1 1.0 2.0 64.9% 60.0% 44.4% 16.7% 45.5% 54.5% 45.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 285/329 0.8 2.9 62.6% 59.3% 45.3% 50.0% 47.0% 54.1% 44.5% — 558/634 0.9 3.7 63.5% 62.2% 46.9% 54.0% 49.6% 56.5% 46.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Su-Wei Hsieh Dominika Cibulkova
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 2001 1548 108.6 — — — — +31 — — 63.2% +1.00 3–2 (60%) 0–2 — +1.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2002 1541 99.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — -0.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1506 100.7 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.20 2–0 1–1 — +0.22
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1606 123.4 -2.75 +1.36 0.957 49.0% -43 +45 — 48.7% +0.04 6–4 (60%) 4–6 (40%) 103.8 +0.03
19 2005 1506 99.1 -0.87 -2.03 0.532 35.9% +18 — — 14.3% -2.43 0–1 0–1 — -0.18 2008 1844 155.6 +2.09 +2.87 1.075 51.6% -8 -147 — 59.4% +0.56 10–9 (53%) 8–3 (73%) 108.8 -3.69
20 2006 1462 97.2 -0.43 -2.06 0.780 45.6% — — — 11.1% -2.11 0–1 — — +0.03 2009 1735 137.2 +0.81 +1.93 1.075 51.5% -29 +84 -128 59.0% +0.64 4–6 (40%) 4–4 (50%) 97.6 +0.20
21 2007 1419 94.3 -0.52 -2.42 0.776 45.0% +29 — — 22.2% -2.00 0–2 0–1 — -0.15 2010 1754 142.7 +0.27 +0.68 0.989 49.8% -26 +62 -79 54.4% +0.28 9–8 (53%) 8–2 (80%) 105.0 +0.39
22 2008 1483 115.6 -0.18 -0.54 0.915 47.9% +35 -31 — 40.0% -0.83 2–2 (50%) 1–1 — -0.39 2011 1894 146.9 +1.53 +4.23 1.113 52.5% -32 -107 -88 61.0% +0.76 15–7 (68%) 9–5 (64%) 108.0 -1.26
23 2009 1473 99.4 -1.34 -1.35 0.959 48.9% +30 — — 33.3% -0.83 — — — +0.39 2012 1791 146.5 +0.57 +4.09 1.101 52.3% -2 +69 -30 59.1% +0.78 6–11 (35%) 10–4 (71%) 97.7 +0.95
24 2010 1454 101.1 -0.49 +0.07 0.946 48.5% — — — 20.0% -0.80 0–1 0–2 — -0.03 2013 1735 139.1 +0.40 +2.51 1.022 50.5% +15 +39 +28 51.7% +0.30 11–7 (61%) 6–7 (46%) 98.9 +0.89
25 2011 1459 105.4 -0.05 -0.94 1.250 55.5% — — — 60.0% +1.40 0–1 0–1 — +0.27 2014 1719 152.6 +1.29 +4.23 1.109 52.3% +50 +17 +28 59.8% +0.75 9–9 (50%) 6–7 (46%) 96.4 -0.25
26 2012 1672 133.4 +1.38 +2.74 1.138 52.7% -4 -182 -35 58.2% +0.62 7–6 (54%) 5–5 (50%) 104.4 +0.40 2015 1757 143.5 -0.51 +1.77 0.989 49.9% +26 — -24 50.6% +0.07 8–5 (62%) 6–4 (60%) 105.0 -0.11
27 2013 1554 116.0 -3.73 +0.15 0.871 46.8% +4 -81 +19 37.6% -1.02 3–6 (33%) 5–7 (42%) 97.2 -0.23 2016 1952 148.1 +2.12 +4.65 1.136 52.9% -29 -154 -64 65.1% +0.91 19–10 (66%) 9–6 (60%) 108.8 -1.07
28 2014 1542 107.7 -3.95 -1.33 0.834 45.9% +33 — — 35.7% -1.24 3–3 (50%) 2–4 (33%) 98.6 +0.26 2017 1778 142.2 +1.03 +1.88 1.067 51.5% +59 -13 +40 55.3% +0.37 9–11 (45%) 5–5 (50%) 93.4 +2.63
29 2015 1582 111.2 -0.41 -0.09 0.996 50.3% +31 — — 48.1% +0.04 4–1 (80%) 1–0 — +0.05 2018 1872 145.7 +1.54 +1.61 1.058 51.3% +3 -108 -24 58.3% +0.53 7–7 (50%) 7–5 (58%) 101.4 -0.82
30 2016 1586 119.0 -0.64 +0.61 0.979 49.4% -1 -70 -44 47.4% -0.11 6–3 (67%) 2–3 (40%) 103.6 -0.11 2019 1755 115.9 -0.72 -0.79 0.839 46.7% +34 -72 — 29.6% -1.19 1–4 (20%) 0–1 — -0.69
31 2017 1601 109.3 -4.02 +0.80 0.895 47.4% -15 -59 -29 37.0% -0.98 4–6 (40%) 3–4 (43%) 98.3 +0.19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2018 1778 132.6 -0.63 +4.07 1.073 51.5% -22 -182 -83 58.2% +0.56 12–6 (67%) 5–4 (56%) 108.9 -0.49 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2019 1781 146.5 +0.12 +2.75 1.033 50.7% +29 -185 -15 52.6% +0.24 16–9 (64%) 10–8 (56%) 107.5 -1.32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2020 1707 118.1 -2.64 +0.13 0.796 44.9% +27 -121 — 17.6% -2.35 0–1 1–0 — -0.47 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2021 1687 126.8 -2.62 -0.02 0.895 47.4% +64 -177 — 43.1% -0.80 3–4 (43%) 4–0 (100%) — -1.53 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2023 1658 96.7 -0.52 -0.38 1.002 49.4% — — — 33.3% -0.33 0–1 0–1 — +0.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2024 1628 102.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1881 128.6 -1.28 +1.43 0.970 49.3% +14 -131 -34 46.0% -0.30 63–56 (53%) 39–44 (47%) 103.9 -0.68 — 1964 150.3 +0.95 +2.81 1.063 51.4% 0 -11 -38 57.0% +0.50 116–98 (54%) 83–60 (58%) 107.2 -0.41

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.