H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Su-Wei Hsieh vs Madison Brengle H2H: 1-0

Su-Wei Hsieh holds a 1–0 lead over Madison Brengle in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Su-Wei Hsieh leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Su-Wei Hsieh won the 2021 Indian Wells Open first round 6-1 7-6(4).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Su-Wei Hsieh
Chinese Taipei Age 40 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Madison Brengle
United States Age 36 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Su-Wei Hsieh #96 6-1 7-6(4) Madison Brengle #88 Match data Oct 8, 2021* R128 Indian Wells Open WTA 1000 Hard
Madison Brengle #81 6-3 6-2 Su-Wei Hsieh #95 Match data Sep 30, 2017 Q2 Q China Open Premier Mandatory → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Su-Wei Hsieh #909 #23 1,960 1,880 153 176 46.5% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Madison Brengle #212 #35 1,324 1,722 94 152 38.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Su-Wei Hsieh Madison Brengle
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 2001 5–2 71.4% #164 1,548 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 2002 0–1 0.0% #267 1,540 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — 2007 1–3 25.0% #229 1,501 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2008 0–3 0.0% #220 1,457 0 0
19 2005 0–3 0.0% #142 1,506 0 0 2009 1–2 33.3% #165 1,457 0 0
20 2006 0–4 0.0% #129 1,462 0 0 2010 0–1 0.0% #188 1,447 0 0
21 2007 1–7 12.5% #157 1,419 0 0 2011 1–1 50.0% #197 1,460 0 0
22 2008 5–8 38.5% #81 1,483 0 0 2012 0–1 0.0% #191 1,444 0 0
23 2009 1–2 33.3% #314 1,473 0 0 — — — — — — —
24 2010 0–2 0.0% #362 1,454 0 0 2014 4–4 50.0% #95 1,474 0 0
25 2011 1–1 50.0% #172 1,458 0 0 2015 25–26 49.0% #40 1,622 0 0
26 2012 22–14 61.1% #25 1,672 0 2 2016 16–23 41.0% #73 1,591 0 0
27 2013 13–25 34.2% #86 1,554 0 2 2017 10–18 35.7% #83 1,654 0 0
28 2014 6–12 33.3% #141 1,542 0 2 2018 3–11 21.4% #88 1,604 0 0
29 2015 6–5 54.5% #93 1,581 0 2 2019 7–11 38.9% #95 1,601 0 0
30 2016 12–12 50.0% #87 1,586 0 2 2020 2–4 33.3% #82 1,644 0 0
31 2017 8–15 34.8% #82 1,600 0 2 2021 6–14 30.0% #59 1,645 0 0
32 2018 32–17 65.3% #28 1,778 0 3 2022 12–16 42.9% #57 1,630 0 0
33 2019 31–24 56.4% #32 1,781 0 3 2023 6–14 30.0% #151 1,583 0 0
34 2020 1–7 12.5% #67 1,706 0 3 — — — — — — —
35 2021 9–14 39.1% #108 1,686 0 3 — — — — — — —
37 2023 0–1 0.0% #713 1,658 0 3 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Su-Wei Hsieh Madison Brengle
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 2001 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2002 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
19 2005 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2009 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
20 2006 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2010 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 2007 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2011 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
22 2008 4 4 8 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2012 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
23 2009 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2010 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2014 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — —
25 2011 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2015 19 16 35 54.3% 6 8 14 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0%
26 2012 15 7 22 68.2% 2 3 5 40.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 2016 10 16 26 38.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 5 3 8 62.5%
27 2013 10 18 28 35.7% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2017 6 14 20 30.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
28 2014 6 8 14 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2018 1 7 8 12.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
29 2015 5 3 8 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2019 4 7 11 36.4% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
30 2016 6 6 12 50.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 2020 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
31 2017 5 9 14 35.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 2021 2 8 10 20.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
32 2018 21 9 30 70.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 5 3 8 62.5% 2022 10 10 20 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
33 2019 23 16 39 59.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 4 3 7 57.1% 2023 4 9 13 30.8% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0%
34 2020 0 5 5 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2021 9 9 18 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2023 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 112 112 224 50.0% 21 37 58 36.2% 20 27 47 42.6% — 65 103 168 38.7% 17 31 48 35.4% 12 18 30 40.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 285/321 of Su-Wei Hsieh's and 225/246 of Madison Brengle's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Su-Wei Hsieh Madison Brengle
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 4/4 0.8 3.0 60.2% 57.4% 40.8% 48.9% 50.7% 50.5% 41.0%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 2/3 0.0 3.0 66.3% 49.4% 35.3% 12.5% 63.6% 45.2% 37.3%
19 2005 1/3 0.0 1.0 68.9% 45.2% 28.6% 44.4% 0.0% 40.0% 31.9% 2009 3/3 0.0 3.7 61.8% 56.2% 38.6% 41.1% 37.6% 49.3% 43.5%
20 2006 2/4 0.0 1.5 70.8% 54.2% 53.1% 56.9% 10.7% 53.2% 36.5% 2010 1/1 1.0 7.0 53.7% 44.4% 38.7% 50.0% 50.0% 41.8% 47.2%
21 2007 3/8 0.3 3.0 58.2% 61.7% 45.8% 57.9% 26.5% 55.0% 34.9% 2011 2/2 0.5 3.5 63.9% 56.3% 44.7% 38.9% 40.0% 52.0% 35.6%
22 2008 11/13 1.1 3.7 53.2% 62.4% 43.3% 51.4% 38.7% 53.6% 42.4% 2012 1/1 5.0 8.0 65.2% 61.3% 35.0% 30.0% 83.3% 52.2% 41.7%
23 2009 3/3 0.3 3.7 58.9% 51.8% 46.8% 29.4% 52.6% 49.8% 48.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2010 2/2 0.5 4.0 60.9% 63.3% 38.7% 52.2% 46.3% 53.7% 43.8% 2014 7/8 0.7 3.0 66.2% 62.5% 42.8% 49.4% 47.3% 55.7% 44.3%
25 2011 2/2 0.0 2.5 62.8% 59.0% 52.3% 72.4% 57.5% 56.4% 54.5% 2015 35/51 1.7 1.9 66.0% 61.5% 48.8% 42.8% 46.6% 57.2% 41.3%
26 2012 29/36 0.6 2.5 64.5% 63.4% 48.2% 50.2% 45.6% 58.1% 47.7% 2016 37/39 0.9 2.2 68.5% 56.8% 45.7% 46.0% 54.9% 53.2% 43.1%
27 2013 33/38 0.7 3.0 62.9% 54.8% 42.6% 45.6% 49.0% 50.2% 43.3% 2017 28/28 0.1 2.5 73.3% 54.5% 39.2% 43.7% 45.2% 50.6% 44.1%
28 2014 14/18 0.9 2.6 61.9% 54.6% 40.0% 41.3% 41.6% 49.3% 42.3% 2018 14/14 0.4 2.7 66.6% 50.4% 43.5% 42.0% 45.0% 48.4% 43.5%
29 2015 7/11 2.1 2.9 61.0% 61.1% 53.7% 55.2% 49.1% 58.2% 41.7% 2019 18/18 0.2 2.2 73.8% 51.9% 37.5% 39.8% 54.6% 48.3% 47.2%
30 2016 24/24 1.1 2.6 58.5% 61.5% 47.9% 48.7% 43.8% 55.8% 43.3% 2020 6/6 0.2 3.7 72.6% 50.8% 44.5% 45.3% 38.1% 49.0% 48.3%
31 2017 23/23 1.1 2.7 63.4% 56.9% 39.7% 45.0% 49.8% 50.5% 44.3% 2021 20/20 0.0 3.1 74.5% 55.6% 39.8% 42.5% 48.0% 51.4% 44.1%
32 2018 46/49 0.8 3.1 63.3% 60.9% 47.5% 57.5% 54.0% 56.0% 47.2% 2022 27/28 0.4 2.9 73.1% 55.8% 39.7% 41.5% 47.1% 51.3% 44.0%
33 2019 53/55 0.7 3.2 64.4% 61.9% 46.6% 51.7% 47.6% 56.5% 44.9% 2023 20/20 0.3 2.7 75.1% 54.6% 41.7% 40.9% 51.5% 51.4% 43.0%
34 2020 8/8 0.1 3.0 61.2% 53.2% 42.9% 42.4% 53.9% 48.9% 40.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2021 23/23 0.7 3.1 64.0% 55.2% 43.8% 49.8% 41.6% 51.7% 43.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2023 1/1 1.0 2.0 64.9% 60.0% 44.4% 16.7% 45.5% 54.5% 45.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 285/329 0.8 2.9 62.6% 59.3% 45.3% 50.0% 47.0% 54.1% 44.5% — 225/246 0.6 2.6 70.3% 55.9% 42.5% 42.8% 49.0% 52.0% 43.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Su-Wei Hsieh Madison Brengle
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 2001 1548 108.6 — — — — +31 — — 63.2% +1.00 3–2 (60%) 0–2 — +1.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2002 1541 99.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — -0.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1502 111.1 0.00 +0.02 0.829 46.5% +16 — — 25.0% -1.75 — — — -0.27
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1458 92.5 -3.04 -1.39 0.681 41.4% — — — 14.3% -2.14 0–1 — — +0.40
19 2005 1506 99.1 -0.87 -2.03 0.532 35.9% +18 — — 14.3% -2.43 0–1 0–1 — -0.18 2009 1457 101.5 -2.95 -0.91 0.858 46.1% — — — 33.3% -1.17 — 0–1 — +0.06
20 2006 1462 97.2 -0.43 -2.06 0.780 45.6% — — — 11.1% -2.11 0–1 — — +0.03 2010 1447 99.2 -3.58 -2.65 0.810 44.2% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — 0.00
21 2007 1419 94.3 -0.52 -2.42 0.776 45.0% +29 — — 22.2% -2.00 0–2 0–1 — -0.15 2011 1460 101.5 -2.09 -1.94 0.741 44.6% — — — 50.0% -1.25 — 1–0 — +0.03
22 2008 1483 115.6 -0.18 -0.54 0.915 47.9% +35 -31 — 40.0% -0.83 2–2 (50%) 1–1 — -0.39 2012 1444 99.4 -2.21 +0.67 0.871 47.4% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 1–0 — +0.16
23 2009 1473 99.4 -1.34 -1.35 0.959 48.9% +30 — — 33.3% -0.83 — — — +0.39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2010 1454 101.1 -0.49 +0.07 0.946 48.5% — — — 20.0% -0.80 0–1 0–2 — -0.03 2014 1474 113.6 -0.29 +1.12 1.002 50.0% +31 — — 42.9% -0.64 0–2 1–1 — +0.14
25 2011 1459 105.4 -0.05 -0.94 1.250 55.5% — — — 60.0% +1.40 0–1 0–1 — +0.27 2015 1622 128.8 -0.60 -0.18 0.964 49.3% +5 -83 — 48.7% -0.07 7–8 (47%) 6–6 (50%) 100.8 +0.20
26 2012 1672 133.4 +1.38 +2.74 1.138 52.7% -4 -182 -35 58.2% +0.62 7–6 (54%) 5–5 (50%) 104.4 +0.40 2016 1592 127.1 -1.99 +0.54 0.921 48.3% +5 -75 +29 42.4% -0.75 7–6 (54%) 3–2 (60%) 103.3 -1.69
27 2013 1554 116.0 -3.73 +0.15 0.871 46.8% +4 -81 +19 37.6% -1.02 3–6 (33%) 5–7 (42%) 97.2 -0.23 2017 1654 130.5 -4.01 +1.14 0.892 47.3% -26 -55 -1 38.2% -0.78 6–6 (50%) 3–2 (60%) 102.1 -1.74
28 2014 1542 107.7 -3.95 -1.33 0.834 45.9% +33 — — 35.7% -1.24 3–3 (50%) 2–4 (33%) 98.6 +0.26 2018 1605 118.6 -4.52 +0.81 0.843 45.8% -20 -29 — 33.3% -1.36 2–5 (29%) 0–2 — -1.35
29 2015 1582 111.2 -0.41 -0.09 0.996 50.3% +31 — — 48.1% +0.04 4–1 (80%) 1–0 — +0.05 2019 1602 115.2 -5.23 +2.99 0.913 47.8% -46 -26 — 42.1% -0.68 0–2 2–1 (67%) — -0.29
30 2016 1586 119.0 -0.64 +0.61 0.979 49.4% -1 -70 -44 47.4% -0.11 6–3 (67%) 2–3 (40%) 103.6 -0.11 2020 1644 121.9 -2.92 +1.95 0.947 48.8% -1 — — 42.9% -1.07 0–2 2–0 — -0.11
31 2017 1601 109.3 -4.02 +0.80 0.895 47.4% -15 -59 -29 37.0% -0.98 4–6 (40%) 3–4 (43%) 98.3 +0.19 2021 1645 119.5 -3.17 +0.46 0.907 47.7% +15 -91 +14 34.8% -1.00 2–4 (33%) 0–2 — -0.62
32 2018 1778 132.6 -0.63 +4.07 1.073 51.5% -22 -182 -83 58.2% +0.56 12–6 (67%) 5–4 (56%) 108.9 -0.49 2022 1631 135.0 -3.81 +1.21 0.902 47.6% +61 -46 -100 42.6% -0.72 3–3 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 101.1 -0.90
33 2019 1781 146.5 +0.12 +2.75 1.033 50.7% +29 -185 -15 52.6% +0.24 16–9 (64%) 10–8 (56%) 107.5 -1.32 2023 1583 118.6 -4.39 -0.51 0.886 47.1% +13 +7 -81 34.9% -1.26 0–5 (0%) 4–4 (50%) 95.1 -0.79
34 2020 1707 118.1 -2.64 +0.13 0.796 44.9% +27 -121 — 17.6% -2.35 0–1 1–0 — -0.47 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2021 1687 126.8 -2.62 -0.02 0.895 47.4% +64 -177 — 43.1% -0.80 3–4 (43%) 4–0 (100%) — -1.53 2025 1572 102.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2026 1521 97.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2023 1658 96.7 -0.52 -0.38 1.002 49.4% — — — 33.3% -0.33 0–1 0–1 — +0.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2024 1628 102.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1881 128.6 -1.28 +1.43 0.970 49.3% +14 -131 -34 46.0% -0.30 63–56 (53%) 39–44 (47%) 103.9 -0.68 — 1723 129.4 -2.95 +0.67 0.906 47.8% +6 -59 -14 40.6% -0.76 27–45 (38%) 25–22 (53%) 98.9 -2.77

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.