H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Su-Wei Hsieh vs Petra Kvitova H2H: 0-4

Petra Kvitova holds a 4–0 lead over Su-Wei Hsieh in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Petra Kvitova leads 3–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Petra Kvitova won the 2019 Dubai Tennis Championships semifinal 3-6 6-2 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Su-Wei Hsieh
Chinese Taipei Age 40 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0 – 4
4 main-draw meetings
Petra Kvitova
Czech Republic Age 36 Left-Handed 182 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Petra Kvitova #4 3-6 6-2 6-4 Su-Wei Hsieh #31 Match data Feb 22, 2019* SF Dubai Tennis Championships Premier 5 → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Petra Kvitova #8 7-6(2) 6-2 Su-Wei Hsieh #28 Match data Jan 10, 2019* R16 Sydney International Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Petra Kvitova #11 7-5 6-0 Su-Wei Hsieh #81 Match data Oct 19, 2016* R32 Luxembourg International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Petra Kvitova #12 6-4 6-1 Su-Wei Hsieh #80 Match data May 26, 2016* R64 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Su-Wei Hsieh #909 #23 1,960 1,880 153 176 46.5% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Petra Kvitova #450 #2 7,690 2,074 515 262 66.3% 2 9 2 14 4 31

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Su-Wei Hsieh Petra Kvitova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 2001 5–2 71.4% #164 1,548 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 2002 0–1 0.0% #267 1,540 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — 2007 0–1 0.0% #150 1,485 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2008 13–14 48.1% #50 1,607 0 0
19 2005 0–3 0.0% #142 1,506 0 0 2009 18–16 52.9% #61 1,702 0 1
20 2006 0–4 0.0% #129 1,462 0 0 2010 17–20 45.9% #34 1,701 0 1
21 2007 1–7 12.5% #157 1,419 0 0 2011 50–11 82.0% #2 2,059 1 7
22 2008 5–8 38.5% #81 1,483 0 0 2012 41–16 71.9% #8 1,960 1 9
23 2009 1–2 33.3% #314 1,473 0 0 2013 49–22 69.0% #6 1,962 1 11
24 2010 0–2 0.0% #362 1,454 0 0 2014 41–17 70.7% #4 1,982 2 14
25 2011 1–1 50.0% #172 1,458 0 0 2015 35–16 68.6% #6 1,908 2 17
26 2012 22–14 61.1% #25 1,672 0 2 2016 46–20 69.7% #11 1,990 2 19
27 2013 13–25 34.2% #86 1,554 0 2 2017 18–10 64.3% #29 1,902 2 20
28 2014 6–12 33.3% #141 1,542 0 2 2018 43–18 70.5% #7 1,896 2 25
29 2015 6–5 54.5% #93 1,581 0 2 2019 37–16 69.8% #7 1,914 2 27
30 2016 12–12 50.0% #87 1,586 0 2 2020 20–7 74.1% #8 1,964 2 27
31 2017 8–15 34.8% #82 1,600 0 2 2021 29–18 61.7% #17 1,888 2 28
32 2018 32–17 65.3% #28 1,778 0 3 2022 28–19 59.6% #16 1,913 2 29
33 2019 31–24 56.4% #32 1,781 0 3 2023 29–13 69.0% #14 1,923 2 31
34 2020 1–7 12.5% #67 1,706 0 3 — — — — — — —
35 2021 9–14 39.1% #108 1,686 0 3 2025 1–8 11.1% — 1,767 2 31
37 2023 0–1 0.0% #713 1,658 0 3 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Su-Wei Hsieh Petra Kvitova
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 2001 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2002 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 6 7 13 46.2% 6 4 10 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
19 2005 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 15 9 24 62.5% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
20 2006 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2010 11 14 25 44.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — —
21 2007 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2011 25 9 34 73.5% 9 1 10 90.0% 11 1 12 91.7% 5 0 5 100.0%
22 2008 4 4 8 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2012 24 9 33 72.7% 10 4 14 71.4% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — —
23 2009 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 33 14 47 70.2% 10 5 15 66.7% 5 2 7 71.4% 1 1 2 50.0%
24 2010 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 26 12 38 68.4% 6 4 10 60.0% 9 1 10 90.0% — — — —
25 2011 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 22 12 34 64.7% 11 3 14 78.6% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
26 2012 15 7 22 68.2% 2 3 5 40.0% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — 2016 36 13 49 73.5% 7 4 11 63.6% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
27 2013 10 18 28 35.7% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2017 11 8 19 57.9% 1 1 2 50.0% 6 1 7 85.7% — — — —
28 2014 6 8 14 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2018 24 13 37 64.9% 13 3 16 81.3% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — —
29 2015 5 3 8 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2019 26 13 39 66.7% 8 2 10 80.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — —
30 2016 6 6 12 50.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2020 15 6 21 71.4% 5 1 6 83.3% — — — — — — — —
31 2017 5 9 14 35.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 2021 18 11 29 62.1% 8 5 13 61.5% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
32 2018 21 9 30 70.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 2022 20 13 33 60.6% 1 4 5 20.0% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — —
33 2019 23 16 39 59.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2023 21 10 31 67.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 8 1 9 88.9% — — — —
34 2020 0 5 5 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2021 9 9 18 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2025 0 4 4 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
37 2023 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 112 112 224 50.0% 21 37 58 36.2% 20 27 47 42.6% — — — — — 333 178 511 65.2% 100 54 154 64.9% 75 27 102 73.5% 7 3 10 70.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 285/321 of Su-Wei Hsieh's and 700/776 of Petra Kvitova's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Su-Wei Hsieh Petra Kvitova
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 24/27 3.0 5.3 63.7% 63.6% 47.7% 46.7% 53.6% 57.6% 45.7%
19 2005 1/3 0.0 1.0 68.9% 45.2% 28.6% 44.4% 0.0% 40.0% 31.9% 2009 30/34 1.8 5.1 59.8% 60.5% 45.4% 55.0% 48.3% 54.5% 47.3%
20 2006 2/4 0.0 1.5 70.8% 54.2% 53.1% 56.9% 10.7% 53.2% 36.5% 2010 35/37 2.8 4.7 62.7% 64.0% 44.8% 52.6% 50.6% 56.9% 42.7%
21 2007 3/8 0.3 3.0 58.2% 61.7% 45.8% 57.9% 26.5% 55.0% 34.9% 2011 56/61 3.8 3.5 61.7% 69.6% 52.2% 58.0% 49.5% 62.8% 45.6%
22 2008 11/13 1.1 3.7 53.2% 62.4% 43.3% 51.4% 38.7% 53.6% 42.4% 2012 51/57 3.5 3.5 63.9% 69.6% 51.7% 55.0% 48.8% 63.1% 47.0%
23 2009 3/3 0.3 3.7 58.9% 51.8% 46.8% 29.4% 52.6% 49.8% 48.1% 2013 68/71 3.6 5.2 62.7% 64.2% 47.5% 58.9% 51.8% 57.9% 44.3%
24 2010 2/2 0.5 4.0 60.9% 63.3% 38.7% 52.2% 46.3% 53.7% 43.8% 2014 52/58 4.9 4.1 62.0% 71.2% 51.8% 54.1% 46.7% 63.8% 45.2%
25 2011 2/2 0.0 2.5 62.8% 59.0% 52.3% 72.4% 57.5% 56.4% 54.5% 2015 38/51 4.2 3.6 63.4% 73.6% 54.7% 56.3% 49.5% 66.5% 42.6%
26 2012 29/36 0.6 2.5 64.5% 63.4% 48.2% 50.2% 45.6% 58.1% 47.7% 2016 57/66 3.8 4.2 61.7% 70.6% 50.9% 56.2% 49.0% 62.8% 45.5%
27 2013 33/38 0.7 3.0 62.9% 54.8% 42.6% 45.6% 49.0% 50.2% 43.3% 2017 28/28 5.6 5.9 58.0% 74.6% 47.5% 51.2% 46.1% 63.3% 43.9%
28 2014 14/18 0.9 2.6 61.9% 54.6% 40.0% 41.3% 41.6% 49.3% 42.3% 2018 55/61 4.4 5.7 59.9% 70.0% 49.7% 60.8% 50.3% 61.8% 45.9%
29 2015 7/11 2.1 2.9 61.0% 61.1% 53.7% 55.2% 49.1% 58.2% 41.7% 2019 45/53 4.9 4.2 61.9% 71.7% 52.0% 60.5% 44.4% 64.4% 44.3%
30 2016 24/24 1.1 2.6 58.5% 61.5% 47.9% 48.7% 43.8% 55.8% 43.3% 2020 26/27 4.8 4.2 63.5% 69.7% 53.3% 54.9% 46.8% 63.5% 46.3%
31 2017 23/23 1.1 2.7 63.4% 56.9% 39.7% 45.0% 49.8% 50.5% 44.3% 2021 42/47 4.5 3.9 64.0% 68.8% 49.7% 62.5% 46.2% 61.9% 44.3%
32 2018 46/49 0.8 3.1 63.3% 60.9% 47.5% 57.5% 54.0% 56.0% 47.2% 2022 46/47 5.1 4.9 63.0% 68.6% 47.4% 61.8% 52.7% 60.6% 41.6%
33 2019 53/55 0.7 3.2 64.4% 61.9% 46.6% 51.7% 47.6% 56.5% 44.9% 2023 40/42 5.3 5.5 62.7% 70.6% 47.6% 53.6% 50.3% 61.8% 43.1%
34 2020 8/8 0.1 3.0 61.2% 53.2% 42.9% 42.4% 53.9% 48.9% 40.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2021 23/23 0.7 3.1 64.0% 55.2% 43.8% 49.8% 41.6% 51.7% 43.2% 2025 7/9 3.1 6.0 63.8% 55.9% 35.9% 46.9% 56.2% 48.7% 36.5%
37 2023 1/1 1.0 2.0 64.9% 60.0% 44.4% 16.7% 45.5% 54.5% 45.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 285/329 0.8 2.9 62.6% 59.3% 45.3% 50.0% 47.0% 54.1% 44.5% — 700/777 4.1 4.6 62.2% 68.8% 49.6% 56.7% 49.2% 61.5% 44.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Su-Wei Hsieh Petra Kvitova
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 2001 1548 108.6 — — — — +31 — — 63.2% +1.00 3–2 (60%) 0–2 — +1.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2002 1541 99.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — -0.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1485 98.5 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.00 0–1 — — +0.05
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1608 130.9 +1.66 +1.28 1.077 51.5% -18 +7 — 50.0% +0.12 5–7 (42%) 3–4 (43%) 100.5 -0.04
19 2005 1506 99.1 -0.87 -2.03 0.532 35.9% +18 — — 14.3% -2.43 0–1 0–1 — -0.18 2009 1703 133.5 -0.27 +2.91 1.039 50.9% +7 -102 — 48.6% +0.10 4–2 (67%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.83
20 2006 1462 97.2 -0.43 -2.06 0.780 45.6% — — — 11.1% -2.11 0–1 — — +0.03 2010 1702 137.8 +1.40 +0.05 0.989 49.8% -21 -143 -22 45.0% -0.47 4–5 (44%) 6–4 (60%) 100.1 -2.15
21 2007 1419 94.3 -0.52 -2.42 0.776 45.0% +29 — — 22.2% -2.00 0–2 0–1 — -0.15 2011 2060 158.0 +7.08 +2.42 1.227 54.1% -93 -295 -101 74.3% +1.54 13–5 (72%) 13–7 (65%) 109.8 -3.06
22 2008 1483 115.6 -0.18 -0.54 0.915 47.9% +35 -31 — 40.0% -0.83 2–2 (50%) 1–1 — -0.39 2012 1960 153.8 +6.34 +3.52 1.273 54.6% +3 -103 -2 66.4% +1.26 12–7 (63%) 5–3 (63%) 102.0 +1.48
23 2009 1473 99.4 -1.34 -1.35 0.959 48.9% +30 — — 33.3% -0.83 — — — +0.39 2013 1963 151.5 +2.63 +1.47 1.052 51.1% +38 -108 +7 61.3% +0.64 23–12 (66%) 9–7 (56%) 102.8 +2.65
24 2010 1454 101.1 -0.49 +0.07 0.946 48.5% — — — 20.0% -0.80 0–1 0–2 — -0.03 2014 1982 155.2 +6.82 +2.91 1.250 54.4% -16 -166 +99 66.9% +1.31 10–7 (59%) 10–4 (71%) 103.3 +2.20
25 2011 1459 105.4 -0.05 -0.94 1.250 55.5% — — — 60.0% +1.40 0–1 0–1 — +0.27 2015 1908 152.2 +7.08 +1.73 1.269 54.3% -11 -15 +115 64.4% +1.07 10–8 (56%) 4–5 (44%) 95.4 +0.55
26 2012 1672 133.4 +1.38 +2.74 1.138 52.7% -4 -182 -35 58.2% +0.62 7–6 (54%) 5–5 (50%) 104.4 +0.40 2016 1990 155.9 +6.43 +2.58 1.224 54.2% +26 -112 -49 67.1% +1.38 11–9 (55%) 7–6 (54%) 97.6 -0.37
27 2013 1554 116.0 -3.73 +0.15 0.871 46.8% +4 -81 +19 37.6% -1.02 3–6 (33%) 5–7 (42%) 97.2 -0.23 2017 1903 140.4 +4.94 +1.34 1.195 53.1% +28 — +99 63.9% +0.87 2–5 (29%) 5–6 (45%) 92.8 -0.22
28 2014 1542 107.7 -3.95 -1.33 0.834 45.9% +33 — — 35.7% -1.24 3–3 (50%) 2–4 (33%) 98.6 +0.26 2018 1896 151.5 +4.70 +3.13 1.203 53.8% -27 +81 +127 64.7% +1.07 16–6 (73%) 7–7 (50%) 104.2 +0.40
29 2015 1582 111.2 -0.41 -0.09 0.996 50.3% +31 — — 48.1% +0.04 4–1 (80%) 1–0 — +0.05 2019 1914 163.0 +6.74 +2.67 1.245 54.0% -18 +139 +129 68.6% +1.29 8–9 (47%) 9–6 (60%) 97.4 -0.06
30 2016 1586 119.0 -0.64 +0.61 0.979 49.4% -1 -70 -44 47.4% -0.11 6–3 (67%) 2–3 (40%) 103.6 -0.11 2020 1965 151.9 +5.00 +3.29 1.269 54.5% -21 +92 — 70.5% +1.49 6–3 (67%) 4–4 (50%) 101.7 +0.33
31 2017 1601 109.3 -4.02 +0.80 0.895 47.4% -15 -59 -29 37.0% -0.98 4–6 (40%) 3–4 (43%) 98.3 +0.19 2021 1889 149.5 +4.60 +1.74 1.160 53.1% +19 +158 +227 63.1% +0.98 8–9 (47%) 6–6 (50%) 94.2 +1.06
32 2018 1778 132.6 -0.63 +4.07 1.073 51.5% -22 -182 -83 58.2% +0.56 12–6 (67%) 5–4 (56%) 108.9 -0.49 2022 1913 149.9 +3.47 -0.04 1.055 51.1% +11 +3 +252 57.3% +0.48 10–5 (67%) 11–8 (58%) 104.8 -0.28
33 2019 1781 146.5 +0.12 +2.75 1.033 50.7% +29 -185 -15 52.6% +0.24 16–9 (64%) 10–8 (56%) 107.5 -1.32 2023 1924 152.8 +4.16 +0.64 1.127 52.2% +25 — +314 64.4% +0.86 6–4 (60%) 11–6 (65%) 101.6 +0.31
34 2020 1707 118.1 -2.64 +0.13 0.796 44.9% +27 -121 — 17.6% -2.35 0–1 1–0 — -0.47 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2021 1687 126.8 -2.62 -0.02 0.895 47.4% +64 -177 — 43.1% -0.80 3–4 (43%) 4–0 (100%) — -1.53 2025 1768 106.1 -3.70 -3.58 0.711 43.0% +76 +18 — 27.3% -1.50 0–4 (0%) — — +0.07
37 2023 1658 96.7 -0.52 -0.38 1.002 49.4% — — — 33.3% -0.33 0–1 0–1 — +0.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2024 1628 102.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1881 128.6 -1.28 +1.43 0.970 49.3% +14 -131 -34 46.0% -0.30 63–56 (53%) 39–44 (47%) 103.9 -0.68 — 2074 157.9 +4.70 +1.98 1.158 52.9% -3 -35 +84 62.9% +0.91 148–108 (58%) 112–84 (57%) 101.7 +0.27

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.