H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Su-Wei Hsieh vs Samantha Stosur H2H: 0-3
Samantha Stosur holds a 3–0 lead over Su-Wei Hsieh in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Samantha Stosur leads 2–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Samantha Stosur won the 2016 Strasbourg fourth round 6-3 7-6(3).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
TPE
Age 40
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
3
3 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 42
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 19, 2016* | Strasbourg | WTA 500 | R16 | Clay | Samantha Stosur | 6-3 7-6(3) | Su-Wei Hsieh | Match data |
| May 15, 2013* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Samantha Stosur | 6-2 6-3 | Su-Wei Hsieh | Match data |
| Feb 22, 2013* | Dubai | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Samantha Stosur | 6-4 6-0 | Su-Wei Hsieh | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Su-Wei Hsieh | #909 | #23 | 1,960 | 1,874 | 150 | 173 | 46.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Samantha Stosur | #531 | #4 | 6,195 | 2,068 | 451 | 335 | 57.4% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 9 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Su-Wei Hsieh | Samantha Stosur | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 2001 | 5–2 | 71.4% | #164 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #267 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #245 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2005 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #142 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #163 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2006 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #129 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #65 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2007 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #157 | 1,419 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #46 | 1,607 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2008 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #81 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 29–24 | 54.7% | #29 | 1,749 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2009 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #314 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #46 | 1,723 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2010 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #362 | 1,455 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 17–11 | 60.7% | #52 | 1,746 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2011 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #172 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 38–20 | 65.5% | #13 | 1,885 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2012 | 22–13 | 62.9% | #25 | 1,689 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 43–19 | 69.4% | #6 | 1,927 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2013 | 13–25 | 34.2% | #86 | 1,558 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 46–21 | 68.7% | #6 | 1,977 | 1 | 3 |
| 28 | 2014 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #141 | 1,545 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 40–23 | 63.5% | #9 | 1,883 | 1 | 3 |
| 29 | 2015 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #93 | 1,583 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 40–22 | 64.5% | #18 | 1,902 | 1 | 5 |
| 30 | 2016 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #87 | 1,588 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 32–22 | 59.3% | #22 | 1,883 | 1 | 6 |
| 31 | 2017 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #82 | 1,600 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 34–22 | 60.7% | #27 | 1,789 | 1 | 8 |
| 32 | 2018 | 30–16 | 65.2% | #28 | 1,768 | 0 | 3 | 2016 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #21 | 1,716 | 1 | 8 |
| 33 | 2019 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #32 | 1,777 | 0 | 3 | 2017 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #41 | 1,734 | 1 | 9 |
| 34 | 2020 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #67 | 1,703 | 0 | 3 | 2018 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #74 | 1,663 | 1 | 9 |
| 35 | 2021 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #108 | 1,686 | 0 | 3 | 2019 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #99 | 1,631 | 1 | 9 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #112 | 1,607 | 1 | 9 |
| 37 | 2023 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #713 | 1,658 | 0 | 3 | 2021 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #382 | 1,522 | 1 | 9 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #529 | 1,511 | 1 | 9 |