H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Su-Wei Hsieh vs Serena Williams H2H: 0-1

Serena Williams holds a 1–0 lead over Su-Wei Hsieh in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Serena Williams leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Serena Williams won the 2016 Australian Open second round 6-1 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Su-Wei Hsieh
Chinese Taipei Age 40 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Serena Williams
USA Age 44 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Serena Williams #1 6-1 6-2 Su-Wei Hsieh #90 Match data Jan 21, 2016* R64 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS Olympics 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Su-Wei Hsieh #909 #23 1,960 1,880 153 176 46.5% 0 0 0 0 0 3 3
Serena Williams #320 #1 13,615 2,399 837 172 83.0% 23 1 23 6 18 2 73

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Su-Wei Hsieh Serena Williams
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 2001 5–2 71.4% #164 1,548 0 0 1997 3–2 60.0% #101 1,582 0 0
16 2002 0–1 0.0% #267 1,540 0 0 1998 26–11 70.3% #20 1,893 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1999 38–7 84.4% #4 2,189 1 5
18 — — — — — — — 2000 37–8 82.2% #6 2,184 1 8
19 2005 0–3 0.0% #142 1,506 0 0 2001 40–7 85.1% #6 2,237 1 11
20 2006 0–4 0.0% #129 1,462 0 0 2002 57–5 91.9% #1 2,339 4 19
21 2007 1–7 12.5% #157 1,419 0 0 2003 36–3 92.3% #3 2,365 6 23
22 2008 5–8 38.5% #81 1,483 0 0 2004 39–11 78.0% #7 2,225 6 25
23 2009 1–2 33.3% #314 1,473 0 0 2005 21–9 70.0% #11 2,101 7 26
24 2010 0–2 0.0% #362 1,454 0 0 2006 12–4 75.0% #95 2,063 7 26
25 2011 1–1 50.0% #172 1,458 0 0 2007 34–10 77.3% #7 2,077 8 28
26 2012 22–14 61.1% #25 1,672 0 2 2008 44–9 83.0% #2 2,126 9 32
27 2013 13–25 34.2% #86 1,554 0 2 2009 50–13 79.4% #1 2,120 11 35
28 2014 6–12 33.3% #141 1,542 0 2 2010 25–4 86.2% #4 2,158 13 37
29 2015 6–5 54.5% #93 1,581 0 2 2011 22–4 84.6% #12 2,182 13 39
30 2016 12–12 50.0% #87 1,586 0 2 2012 54–6 90.0% #3 2,302 15 46
31 2017 8–15 34.8% #82 1,600 0 2 2013 77–5 93.9% #1 2,382 17 57
32 2018 32–17 65.3% #28 1,778 0 3 2014 52–10 83.9% #1 2,272 18 64
33 2019 31–24 56.4% #32 1,781 0 3 2015 50–6 89.3% #1 2,292 21 69
34 2020 1–7 12.5% #67 1,706 0 3 2016 38–6 86.4% #2 2,208 22 71
35 2021 9–14 39.1% #108 1,686 0 3 2017 8–1 88.9% #22 2,200 23 72
36 — — — — — — — 2018 18–7 72.0% #16 2,112 23 72
37 2023 0–1 0.0% #713 1,658 0 3 2019 25–8 75.8% #10 2,093 23 72
38 — — — — — — — 2020 16–5 76.2% #11 2,045 23 73
39 — — — — — — — 2021 12–6 66.7% #41 1,994 23 73
40 — — — — — — — 2022 3–4 42.9% #320 1,926 23 73
44 — — — — — — — 2026 0–1 0.0% #320 1,899 23 73

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Su-Wei Hsieh Serena Williams
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 2001 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 — — — — — — — — — — — — 3 2 5 60.0%
16 2002 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 16 7 23 69.6% 6 2 8 75.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 27 4 31 87.1% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — 5 0 5 100.0%
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 29 5 34 85.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 1 6 83.3% 3 1 4 75.0%
19 2005 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 32 5 37 86.5% 4 1 5 80.0% 4 1 5 80.0% — — — —
20 2006 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2002 28 3 31 90.3% 18 2 20 90.0% 7 0 7 100.0% 4 0 4 100.0%
21 2007 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2003 13 0 13 100.0% 12 3 15 80.0% 7 0 7 100.0% 4 0 4 100.0%
22 2008 4 4 8 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2004 23 6 29 79.3% 10 4 14 71.4% 6 1 7 85.7% — — — —
23 2009 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 16 5 21 76.2% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0%
24 2010 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 12 4 16 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2011 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 24 6 30 80.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 4 1 5 80.0% — — — —
26 2012 15 7 22 68.2% 2 3 5 40.0% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — 2008 27 5 32 84.4% 11 3 14 78.6% 6 1 7 85.7% — — — —
27 2013 10 18 28 35.7% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2009 36 8 44 81.8% 4 4 8 50.0% 7 0 7 100.0% 3 1 4 75.0%
28 2014 6 8 14 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2010 10 1 11 90.9% 8 3 11 72.7% 7 0 7 100.0% — — — —
29 2015 5 3 8 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2011 18 2 20 90.0% — — — — 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
30 2016 6 6 12 50.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2012 26 4 30 86.7% 15 2 17 88.2% 13 0 13 100.0% — — — —
31 2017 5 9 14 35.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 2013 46 4 50 92.0% 28 0 28 100.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — —
32 2018 21 9 30 70.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 2014 41 6 47 87.2% 9 3 12 75.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
33 2019 23 16 39 59.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2015 30 3 33 90.9% 13 3 16 81.3% 7 0 7 100.0% — — — —
34 2020 0 5 5 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 2016 20 5 25 80.0% 11 1 12 91.7% 7 0 7 100.0% — — — —
35 2021 9 9 18 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2017 8 1 9 88.9% — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 9 5 14 64.3% 3 1 4 75.0% 6 1 7 85.7% — — — —
37 2023 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2019 16 5 21 76.2% 3 2 5 60.0% 6 1 7 85.7% — — — —
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 15 4 19 78.9% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 8 2 10 80.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
44 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2026 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
Career — 112 112 224 50.0% 21 37 58 36.2% 20 27 47 42.6% — — — — — 533 103 636 83.8% 174 47 221 78.7% 107 17 124 86.3% 23 5 28 82.1%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 285/321 of Su-Wei Hsieh's and 633/768 of Serena Williams's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Su-Wei Hsieh Serena Williams
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 2005 1/3 0.0 1.0 68.9% 45.2% 28.6% 44.4% 0.0% 40.0% 31.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2006 2/4 0.0 1.5 70.8% 54.2% 53.1% 56.9% 10.7% 53.2% 36.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2007 3/8 0.3 3.0 58.2% 61.7% 45.8% 57.9% 26.5% 55.0% 34.9% 2003 13/39 3.9 2.1 61.7% 74.0% 52.8% 63.9% 58.8% 66.1% 51.8%
22 2008 11/13 1.1 3.7 53.2% 62.4% 43.3% 51.4% 38.7% 53.6% 42.4% 2004 16/50 6.4 2.6 61.3% 73.3% 51.5% 64.8% 54.6% 64.9% 49.7%
23 2009 3/3 0.3 3.7 58.9% 51.8% 46.8% 29.4% 52.6% 49.8% 48.1% 2005 14/30 5.9 2.6 61.2% 74.1% 52.5% 68.0% 48.3% 65.1% 47.5%
24 2010 2/2 0.5 4.0 60.9% 63.3% 38.7% 52.2% 46.3% 53.7% 43.8% 2006 15/16 6.3 2.9 59.3% 74.2% 47.4% 54.7% 58.2% 63.1% 46.9%
25 2011 2/2 0.0 2.5 62.8% 59.0% 52.3% 72.4% 57.5% 56.4% 54.5% 2007 42/44 6.1 2.6 59.4% 69.2% 48.1% 58.2% 57.3% 60.8% 46.0%
26 2012 29/36 0.6 2.5 64.5% 63.4% 48.2% 50.2% 45.6% 58.1% 47.7% 2008 44/53 6.8 2.7 61.4% 73.4% 45.2% 60.0% 47.6% 62.7% 47.7%
27 2013 33/38 0.7 3.0 62.9% 54.8% 42.6% 45.6% 49.0% 50.2% 43.3% 2009 57/63 6.2 2.8 60.8% 75.0% 50.7% 54.5% 48.2% 65.3% 46.2%
28 2014 14/18 0.9 2.6 61.9% 54.6% 40.0% 41.3% 41.6% 49.3% 42.3% 2010 29/29 8.6 2.9 62.3% 77.4% 47.5% 66.0% 51.5% 66.4% 46.8%
29 2015 7/11 2.1 2.9 61.0% 61.1% 53.7% 55.2% 49.1% 58.2% 41.7% 2011 25/26 8.0 2.5 59.0% 79.5% 53.0% 67.2% 50.8% 68.7% 46.9%
30 2016 24/24 1.1 2.6 58.5% 61.5% 47.9% 48.7% 43.8% 55.8% 43.3% 2012 48/60 8.2 2.3 59.0% 78.7% 54.8% 66.6% 53.2% 68.8% 49.8%
31 2017 23/23 1.1 2.7 63.4% 56.9% 39.7% 45.0% 49.8% 50.5% 44.3% 2013 74/82 6.1 2.2 63.0% 76.5% 53.5% 60.3% 56.0% 68.1% 52.4%
32 2018 46/49 0.8 3.1 63.3% 60.9% 47.5% 57.5% 54.0% 56.0% 47.2% 2014 56/62 7.7 3.5 59.3% 76.5% 51.6% 64.4% 52.8% 66.3% 48.9%
33 2019 53/55 0.7 3.2 64.4% 61.9% 46.6% 51.7% 47.6% 56.5% 44.9% 2015 50/56 9.5 3.5 59.9% 76.7% 55.9% 67.3% 54.5% 68.4% 47.8%
34 2020 8/8 0.1 3.0 61.2% 53.2% 42.9% 42.4% 53.9% 48.9% 40.7% 2016 41/44 7.9 2.8 62.3% 77.4% 51.9% 58.8% 50.6% 68.0% 49.0%
35 2021 23/23 0.7 3.1 64.0% 55.2% 43.8% 49.8% 41.6% 51.7% 43.2% 2017 9/9 7.9 3.9 55.9% 79.6% 46.7% 57.9% 51.3% 65.7% 46.5%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 24/25 7.1 3.4 59.2% 74.2% 48.5% 55.3% 51.9% 63.9% 44.0%
37 2023 1/1 1.0 2.0 64.9% 60.0% 44.4% 16.7% 45.5% 54.5% 45.5% 2019 31/33 6.6 2.8 59.2% 76.5% 50.4% 50.4% 45.6% 65.5% 46.7%
38 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 20/21 8.9 2.7 61.3% 73.3% 50.7% 71.0% 49.7% 64.3% 44.9%
39 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 17/18 5.1 2.6 57.4% 72.6% 48.9% 43.6% 49.4% 62.4% 46.2%
40 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 7/7 8.0 4.7 65.0% 68.0% 35.4% 62.0% 45.8% 56.6% 40.5%
44 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2026 1/1 7.0 7.0 79.0% 62.7% 45.0% 54.6% 27.3% 59.0% 38.2%
Career — 285/329 0.8 2.9 62.6% 59.3% 45.3% 50.0% 47.0% 54.1% 44.5% — 633/1,009 7.2 2.8 60.6% 75.5% 50.9% 60.9% 52.1% 65.8% 48.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Su-Wei Hsieh Serena Williams
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 2001 1548 108.6 — — — — +31 — — 63.2% +1.00 3–2 (60%) 0–2 — +1.12 1997 1582 144.0 — — — — +42 — — 54.5% +0.82 1–0 1–1 — -0.18
16 2002 1541 99.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — -0.23 1998 1893 158.1 — — — — -62 -201 -189 64.6% +1.29 8–5 (62%) 2–3 (40%) 106.2 -1.19
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 2189 178.2 — — — — +12 -418 — 80.2% +2.10 8–5 (62%) 6–0 (100%) 108.5 -2.69
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 2185 168.9 — — — — +24 — -372 80.6% +2.43 6–1 (86%) 4–3 (57%) 102.2 +0.57
19 2005 1506 99.1 -0.87 -2.03 0.532 35.9% +18 — — 14.3% -2.43 0–1 0–1 — -0.18 2001 2238 172.8 — — — — +36 -434 -326 79.2% +2.45 7–4 (64%) 5–5 (50%) 100.5 -2.79
20 2006 1462 97.2 -0.43 -2.06 0.780 45.6% — — — 11.1% -2.11 0–1 — — +0.03 2002 2339 173.4 — — — — +18 -278 -232 87.1% +2.70 9–3 (75%) 11–1 (92%) 111.5 -2.86
21 2007 1419 94.3 -0.52 -2.42 0.776 45.0% +29 — — 22.2% -2.00 0–2 0–1 — -0.15 2003 2365 170.4 +7.11 +5.95 1.527 58.7% +80 -218 -130 86.0% +2.74 6–2 (75%) 2–0 — -1.67
22 2008 1483 115.6 -0.18 -0.54 0.915 47.9% +35 -31 — 40.0% -0.83 2–2 (50%) 1–1 — -0.39 2004 2226 163.6 +6.68 +4.43 1.416 56.9% +107 -101 +86 74.8% +1.90 9–4 (69%) 4–3 (57%) 96.9 -0.38
23 2009 1473 99.4 -1.34 -1.35 0.959 48.9% +30 — — 33.3% -0.83 — — — +0.39 2005 2101 150.6 +5.70 +2.41 1.360 56.0% +157 -3 +122 70.0% +1.48 8–0 (100%) 1–6 (14%) 99.2 -0.26
24 2010 1454 101.1 -0.49 +0.07 0.946 48.5% — — — 20.0% -0.80 0–1 0–2 — -0.03 2006 2064 147.1 +4.12 +2.38 1.272 54.9% +120 — — 69.4% +1.75 3–1 (75%) 0–3 (0%) 96.2 -0.43
25 2011 1459 105.4 -0.05 -0.94 1.250 55.5% — — — 60.0% +1.40 0–1 0–1 — +0.27 2007 2077 165.4 +4.80 +3.80 1.173 53.4% +88 +12 +155 78.3% +1.84 6–4 (60%) 9–3 (75%) 101.7 -2.31
26 2012 1672 133.4 +1.38 +2.74 1.138 52.7% -4 -182 -35 58.2% +0.62 7–6 (54%) 5–5 (50%) 104.4 +0.40 2008 2126 164.9 +6.89 +4.29 1.280 55.0% +42 -33 +130 80.0% +2.11 9–4 (69%) 5–2 (71%) 102.9 -1.00
27 2013 1554 116.0 -3.73 +0.15 0.871 46.8% +4 -81 +19 37.6% -1.02 3–6 (33%) 5–7 (42%) 97.2 -0.23 2009 2120 165.8 +9.20 +3.92 1.332 55.3% +59 -117 +157 75.6% +1.76 11–6 (65%) 8–8 (50%) 98.1 -2.33
28 2014 1542 107.7 -3.95 -1.33 0.834 45.9% +33 — — 35.7% -1.24 3–3 (50%) 2–4 (33%) 98.6 +0.26 2010 2159 157.0 +8.78 +3.86 1.393 56.1% +37 -163 +212 79.1% +2.01 6–3 (67%) 10–2 (83%) 106.5 -1.14
29 2015 1582 111.2 -0.41 -0.09 0.996 50.3% +31 — — 48.1% +0.04 4–1 (80%) 1–0 — +0.05 2011 2182 160.3 +9.93 +4.56 1.499 57.5% +57 — +125 78.9% +2.33 6–1 (86%) 3–2 (60%) 101.2 -0.27
30 2016 1586 119.0 -0.64 +0.61 0.979 49.4% -1 -70 -44 47.4% -0.11 6–3 (67%) 2–3 (40%) 103.6 -0.11 2012 2302 168.5 +11.57 +6.33 1.597 58.7% -26 -157 +62 88.2% +2.98 6–1 (86%) 3–2 (60%) 103.3 -2.18
31 2017 1601 109.3 -4.02 +0.80 0.895 47.4% -15 -59 -29 37.0% -0.98 4–6 (40%) 3–4 (43%) 98.3 +0.19 2013 2383 177.8 +12.05 +8.21 1.643 59.9% -2 -40 +41 89.7% +3.22 10–4 (71%) 3–3 (50%) 101.0 -0.69
32 2018 1778 132.6 -0.63 +4.07 1.073 51.5% -22 -182 -83 58.2% +0.56 12–6 (67%) 5–4 (56%) 108.9 -0.49 2014 2273 171.7 +9.98 +6.05 1.454 57.3% +55 +1 +33 83.6% +2.37 7–3 (70%) 8–0 (100%) 102.4 -0.53
33 2019 1781 146.5 +0.12 +2.75 1.033 50.7% +29 -185 -15 52.6% +0.24 16–9 (64%) 10–8 (56%) 107.5 -1.32 2015 2293 165.1 +9.57 +5.97 1.514 57.9% +37 -12 +16 81.3% +2.24 17–2 (89%) 7–2 (78%) 105.8 -0.61
34 2020 1707 118.1 -2.64 +0.13 0.796 44.9% +27 -121 — 17.6% -2.35 0–1 1–0 — -0.47 2016 2208 161.7 +10.55 +5.23 1.529 57.9% +31 +121 +136 83.0% +2.39 4–2 (67%) 8–2 (80%) 100.3 -0.68
35 2021 1687 126.8 -2.62 -0.02 0.895 47.4% +64 -177 — 43.1% -0.80 3–4 (43%) 4–0 (100%) — -1.53 2017 2201 137.8 +4.47 +1.79 1.354 56.0% +39 — — 89.5% +2.32 0–1 1–0 — -0.09
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 2112 148.0 +5.23 +2.07 1.220 53.7% +22 +268 +229 71.2% +1.29 3–1 (75%) 3–0 (100%) 102.0 -0.74
37 2023 1658 96.7 -0.52 -0.38 1.002 49.4% — — — 33.3% -0.33 0–1 0–1 — +0.20 2019 2094 156.8 +7.34 +3.63 1.352 55.6% +42 +282 +271 77.3% +2.05 7–1 (88%) — — -0.12
38 2024 1628 102.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 2046 143.2 +4.70 +1.29 1.259 54.8% +19 — — 70.6% +1.55 7–4 (64%) 4–3 (57%) 97.0 +0.57
39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1994 145.6 +4.15 +2.90 1.229 53.9% +132 +333 — 68.6% +1.54 3–0 (100%) 2–2 (50%) 101.9 -0.19
40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1926 119.5 +0.06 -0.90 0.934 48.7% +144 — — 47.1% -0.35 1–2 (33%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.04
44 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2026 1899 96.8 +0.09 -3.44 0.931 47.3% — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 1–0 — +0.12
Career — 1881 128.6 -1.28 +1.43 0.970 49.3% +14 -131 -34 46.0% -0.30 63–56 (53%) 39–44 (47%) 103.9 -0.68 — 2399 174.5 +8.45 +4.77 1.403 56.6% +43 -85 +34 79.6% +2.21 168–65 (72%) 113–57 (66%) 110.8 -2.44

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.