H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC

Su-Wei Hsieh vs Serena Williams H2H: 0-1

Serena Williams holds a 1–0 lead over Su-Wei Hsieh in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Serena Williams leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Serena Williams won the 2016 Australian Open second round 6-1 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Su-Wei Hsieh
TPE Age 40 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Serena Williams
USA Age 44 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 21, 2016* Australian Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Serena Williams #1 6-1 6-2 Su-Wei Hsieh #90 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Su-Wei Hsieh #909 #23 1,960 1,874 150 173 46.4% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Serena Williams #320 #1 13,615 2,405 825 170 82.9% 23 23 5 17 3 71

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Su-Wei Hsieh Serena Williams
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 2001 5–2 71.4% #164 1,549 0 0 1997 3–2 60.0% #101 1,582 0 0
16 2002 0–1 0.0% #267 1,541 0 0 1998 26–11 70.3% #20 1,895 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1999 37–7 84.1% #4 2,170 1 4
18 — — — — — — — 2000 37–8 82.2% #6 2,174 1 7
19 2005 0–3 0.0% #142 1,506 0 0 2001 40–7 85.1% #6 2,259 1 10
20 2006 0–4 0.0% #129 1,462 0 0 2002 57–5 91.9% #1 2,348 4 18
21 2007 1–7 12.5% #157 1,419 0 0 2003 36–3 92.3% #3 2,369 6 22
22 2008 5–8 38.5% #81 1,483 0 0 2004 39–11 78.0% #7 2,192 6 24
23 2009 1–2 33.3% #314 1,474 0 0 2005 21–9 70.0% #11 2,028 7 25
24 2010 0–2 0.0% #362 1,455 0 0 2006 12–4 75.0% #95 2,016 7 25
25 2011 1–1 50.0% #172 1,460 0 0 2007 34–10 77.3% #7 2,058 8 27
26 2012 22–13 62.9% #25 1,689 0 2 2008 41–8 83.7% #2 2,109 9 31
27 2013 13–25 34.2% #86 1,558 0 2 2009 50–13 79.4% #1 2,106 11 34
28 2014 6–12 33.3% #141 1,545 0 2 2010 25–4 86.2% #4 2,149 13 36
29 2015 6–5 54.5% #93 1,583 0 2 2011 22–4 84.6% #12 2,155 13 38
30 2016 12–12 50.0% #87 1,588 0 2 2012 48–6 88.9% #3 2,239 15 44
31 2017 8–15 34.8% #82 1,600 0 2 2013 77–5 93.9% #1 2,345 17 55
32 2018 30–16 65.2% #28 1,768 0 3 2014 52–10 83.9% #1 2,209 18 62
33 2019 30–23 56.6% #32 1,777 0 3 2015 50–6 89.3% #1 2,197 21 67
34 2020 1–7 12.5% #67 1,703 0 3 2016 36–5 87.8% #2 2,177 22 69
35 2021 9–14 39.1% #108 1,686 0 3 2017 8–1 88.9% #22 2,172 23 70
36 — — — — — — — 2018 18–7 72.0% #16 2,078 23 70
37 2023 0–1 0.0% #713 1,658 0 3 2019 25–8 75.8% #10 2,052 23 70
38 — — — — — — — 2020 16–5 76.2% #11 1,991 23 71
39 — — — — — — — 2021 12–6 66.7% #41 1,950 23 71
40 — — — — — — — 2022 3–4 42.9% #320 1,891 23 71
44 — — — — — — — 2026 0–1 0.0% #320 — 23 71