H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Tamara Korpatsch vs Jil Teichmann H2H: 2-2
Tamara Korpatsch and Jil Teichmann are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Tamara Korpatsch leads 2–1 on clay, while Jil Teichmann leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jil Teichmann won the 2019 Limoges third round 7-6(4) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 31
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
SUI
Age 29
Left-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 19, 2019* | Limoges | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Jil Teichmann | 7-6(4) 6-3 | Tamara Korpatsch | Match data |
| Jul 20, 2019* | Lausanne | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Tamara Korpatsch | 3-6 6-0 6-1 | Jil Teichmann | Match data |
| May 3, 2019* | Prague | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Jil Teichmann | 6-2 6-1 | Tamara Korpatsch | Match data |
| Jul 20, 2017* | Gstaad | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Tamara Korpatsch | 6-3 6-0 | Jil Teichmann | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tamara Korpatsch | #75 | #71 | 951 | 1,731 | 46 | 72 | 39.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Jil Teichmann | #119 | #21 | 2,101 | 1,876 | 98 | 107 | 47.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tamara Korpatsch | Jil Teichmann | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #209 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #139 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #148 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #69 | 1,632 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 2017 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #164 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #57 | 1,671 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2018 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #117 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #37 | 1,766 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2019 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #111 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #35 | 1,690 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2020 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #126 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #147 | 1,613 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2021 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #179 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 2024 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #135 | 1,633 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2022 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #74 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 | 2025 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #123 | 1,651 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2023 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #84 | 1,656 | 0 | 1 | 2026 | 6–2 | 75.0% | #119 | 1,709 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2024 | 4–16 | 20.0% | #168 | 1,519 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2025 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #125 | 1,609 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2026 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #75 | 1,659 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |